Jump to content

User:Martinevans123: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
"moving on"
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Long wikibreak|[[User:Martinevans123]]|when there are no more vandals to waste time over or when hell freezes over (whichever comes soonest)}}
[[File:Teddy-online.JPG|thumb|190px|left|Teddyevans123, once again [[croquet|pegged out]] [[Police lineup|online]], [[Leftfield|on the left]], by his fellow [[Mug shot|editors]]]]
[[File:Teddy-online.JPG|thumb|190px|left|Teddyevans123, once again [[croquet|pegged out]] [[Police lineup|online]], [[Leftfield|on the left]], by his fellow [[Mug shot|editors]]]]
{{Userboxtop}}
{{Userboxtop}}

Revision as of 07:44, 22 April 2015

Template:Long wikibreak

Teddyevans123, once again pegged out online, on the left, by his fellow editors
Master Editor
Master Editor

....... edit count

Question 1

  • Wikipedia is:
  • (a) a social networking site for people who like to look quite clever
  • (b) a specialist website that allows sufferers of OCD to search for missing commas and fullstops
  • (c) an encyclopedia committee that expends 90% of its energy in pointless arguments over trivia
  • (d) a paranoid fascist organisation more concerned with enforcing rules than quality of content
  • (e) a new religion
  • (f) a prolonged endurance test for those internet addictees, with failing eyesight and few remaining letters on their first generation laptops, who are still searching for the wiki-spellchecker
  • (g) "a poorly-run bureaucracy with the group dynamics of a cult" [1]
  • (h) an incessant pansy-throwing bickering match for know-it-all, more-knowledgeable-than-thou, big-headed show-offs
  • (i) a playground for internet bullies

Please tick all that apply from the list above and explain why, with reliable references

(N.B. it doesn't have to be a true answer)

Please then gain consensus for your answer, from amongst a random sample of 934 strangely pseudonymic volunteer participants, before proceeding to Question 2

Note: This question is worth a maximum of 0 marks

Marks will be deducted for obvious expressions of exasperation or humour

Please show a full record of your working on the Talk Page Jotter provided

Sleep is optional

Please begin again yesterday


Question 57

(note: Questions 2-56 have been speedily deleted for copyright infringement)

Please answer using the following cultural conventions:

Modern contributors may respond thus: "Now just a moment, dude, let's take a rain-check on the underlying synergies here, we need to explore a few more dynamic possibilities for rationally ostensible underpinnings.... ".

Traditional contributors may respond thus: "F*ck off you useless piece of US college sh*t, go "troll yourself"!! (.. ye olde "Lancan-cester-shire greeting")

Note: This question is worth a maximum of 100 marks

Up to 99 marks will be deducted for not re-stating at least six arguments that have been archived in the last two years.

Please turn over your paper when you hear the bell.

A shared pencil will be provided (although it is a bit blunt, sorry - please invent your own sharpener)


Question 58 (EU passport required to fully answer this question)

  • Pick me, I'm clean, I am also programmed for conversational English.
  • May I have this dance?
  • I've got a better idea . . .
  • "What's a girl like you doing in a place like this? Do you come here often? Wait a minute. . . I've got it . . . You're an Italian . . . What? You're Jewish? Love your nails . . . You must be a Libra . . . Your place or mine?"


Question 58a

Here in Good-Old-God-Save-America
the home of the brave and the free
We are all hopelessly oppressed cowards
Of some duality
Of restless multiplicity
(Oh say can you see)

not even a mention?


Question 101

What is the probability of choosing the right answer to question 58a?

  • 25%
  • 50%
  • 100%
  • 25%


Multimedia Observation Test (Hints and tips #59)

Please view the multimedia presentation selected from the "Vietnam Cultural Archive of Rock Sorcery"', via the prohibited website below (N.B. extensive use of the archaic "glitter clog") and then vote against the statement:

"This is how the Wikipedia concept of "gathering consensus" sometimes appears to ignorant and lazy editors."

(editors with a sensitive or nervous disposition may wish to "avert their gays")

original YouTube caption says it so much more eloquently than I could:

"{insert name of editor of your choice}, a man with a mental problem. Please suppose {editor of choice} he need treatmeant not be be jail."
N.B. this is not a vote.

And now, while all those zillions of wiki-votes PCC spoilt ballots are being carefully counted, here's a little more (black and white) entertainment from the BBC archive.... "Goodness Gracious", apparently:

well, for a while, anyway...

(note cunningly concealled "Glitter Watch"


All you really need to know is here: Wikipedia:WikiSpeak

and of course here: "I loves it bro... Safe!" [2]

This editor is a
Master Editor
and is entitled to display this Platinum
Editor Star
.

"With a brand new nose, who knows where it goes." [3]