User talk:Erpert

Hi

• I have restored your article No Love (I'm Not Used to) which was deleted without discussion. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:49, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Thanks. But it's funny that the user who redirected it used WP:NSONGS as a rationale but somehow missed the very first point:
    
    

“ Has been ranked on national or significant music or sales charts. ”

Erpert ^{blah, blah, blah...} 08:53, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

ANI

I don't even care if this is appropriate or not, but I just wanted to thank you for everything you said. It sounds ridiculous, but it's been very stressful on me and a bit depressing, but your comment made me feel a lot better. Thank you. SanctuaryX (talk) 04:19, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Why would thanking me be inappropriate? You're welcome, and I hope you have a better day. Erpert ^{blah, blah, blah...} 04:20, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Well after this dude I feel like there's a wrong way to breathe on Wikipedia.SanctuaryX (talk) 04:48, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

In the same vein...what the heck have I done here? Honestly, it's really amusing being accused of sockpuppetry and malicious editing for finishing out a couple procedural closes. ansh666 23:51, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Ban proposals

Go on WP:AN, not WP:ANI. Could you stop moving stuff around, please? Viriditas (talk) 21:09, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Sheesh, calm down. I was just about to leave a message on your talk page. Erpert ^{blah, blah, blah...} 21:10, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

A Fine Frenzy

Please see Talk:A Fine Frenzy#RfC for article name change.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 23:10, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

(actress)

Believe it or not, I'm trying to be helpful, but it seems like I just cloud the issue for many. Sorry if it comes across this way... --Scalhotrod (Talk) ☮ღ☺ 21:29, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

I didn't take it that way. Erpert ^{blah, blah, blah...} 07:00, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hamish Rosser, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Vines (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Feminist Porn Award.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Feminist Porn Award.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:54, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Just Between Us (disambiguation)

Just a note because you created the MfD discussion. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Just Between Us (disambiguation) has been procedurally closed and a new discussion has been created at AfD, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Just Between Us (disambiguation). North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:47, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Lead vocalist / backing vocalist

• I don't dispute that you went through the proper formal procedures (for instance here), but I for one missed that suggestion, and I'm sure that there are others who would welcome an explanation of why you are making that proposal without, it seems, seeking to merge the content of the articles with the wider article on singing. The articles are pretty poor, but I think there are strong arguments for retaining and improving them rather than removing them entirely. Ghmyrtle (talk) 14:13, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
  • To me, the articles appeared to be nothing but original research (not that I disagree with everything, but...). In addition, it was one of those situations where there was no criteria for why those particular vocalists were listed; it seemed like random users just popped in and listed their favorite vocalist. And with all due respect, the additions you added were more original research, because none of them are sourced. If you really want to leave the articles, why not have a discussion on the talk page like I suggested? (SN: What does "status quo ante" mean?) Erpert ^{blah, blah, blah...} 07:08, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
    • I certainly agree that the current articles are not well written or well referenced - nor, incidentally, are Singing#Vocal music or Vocal music. That is not to say that the articles should be removed or merged. I have no doubt that ample sources exist that would allow the creation of good encyclopedic articles on both topics of lead vocalist and backing vocalist in popular music (which is what the articles are about, hence my explanatory edits), though I'm neither a musicologist nor a musician and so may not be the best person to attempt to do that. The first step (already done) is to tag the articles as needing improvement. The second step is to improve them. Once those steps have been tried, and found to fail, they could then be considered for merger or deletion. I'm happy for you to raise your particular concerns on the article talk pages, where they can be discussed further. PS: see status quo ante. Ghmyrtle (talk) 07:26, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
      • Actually, WP:UNSOURCED states that such information can indeed be removed. What's the point of having an unsourced content fork? Erpert ^{blah, blah, blah...} 08:38, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
        • "When tagging or removing material for lacking an inline citation, please state your concern that there may not be a published reliable source for the content, and therefore it may not be verifiable. If you think the material is verifiable, you are encouraged to provide an inline citation yourself before considering whether to remove or tag it." Your approach seems to suggest that every variety of singing should be contained within the article on "Singing" - which seems an extreme position, to put it mildly. Ghmyrtle (talk) 09:46, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
          • • No, I'm just not into entire OR articles. Erpert ^{blah, blah, blah...} 10:16, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Unconditional Love (Hi-Five song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Faithful (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Feminist Porn Awards front page screenshot 2015-04-22.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Feminist Porn Awards front page screenshot 2015-04-22.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 4 May 2015 (UTC)