User talk:Jojhutton: Difference between revisions
→Thank you: WP:Don't Feed the Trolls. Indef blocked user is now a sock puppet. Time to ignore |
GhostLight1 (talk | contribs) →Hey: new section |
||
| Line 199: | Line 199: | ||
</div></div> |
</div></div> |
||
<!-- Message sent by User:LivingBot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/Tools/Spamlist&oldid=673504216 --> |
<!-- Message sent by User:LivingBot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/Tools/Spamlist&oldid=673504216 --> |
||
== Hey == |
|||
Apologize for being an anti vaccine pov pusher. This site is supposed to about truth not your bias against vaccines. Curse of Fenic was right about you. He is right you are wrong and you owe him an apology. Fix the Disneyland article or I will. [[User:GhostLight1|GhostLight1]] ([[User talk:GhostLight1|talk]]) 06:13, 2 August 2015 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 06:13, 2 August 2015
 | This page has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
If you leave me a message here, I will answer here
 | This page is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
|
Life is grand |
.svg){kind=small}
| Team | W | L | Pct. | GB | Home | Road |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Los Angeles Dodgers | 92 | 70 | .568 | — | 55–26 | 37–44 |
| San Francisco Giants | 84 | 78 | .519 | 8 | 47–34 | 37–44 |
| Arizona Diamondbacks | 79 | 83 | .488 | 13 | 39–42 | 40–41 |
| San Diego Padres | 74 | 88 | .457 | 18 | 39–42 | 35–46 |
| Colorado Rockies | 68 | 94 | .420 | 24 | 36–45 | 32–49 |
List of American television programs by date
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
The Signpost: 01 July 2015
- News and notes: Training the Trainers; VP of Engineering leaves WMF
- In the media: EU freedom of panorama; Nehru outrage; BBC apology
- WikiProject report: Able to make a stand
- Featured content: Viva V.E.R.D.I.
- Traffic report: We're Baaaaack
- Technology report: Technical updates and improvements
Wikinic rescheduled
| 5th Annual Wiknic rescheduled to Saturday, July 25, 2015, ~9:30am-4pm | |
|---|---|
 Due to a conflict with the Redondo Loves Wikipedia edit-a-thon, the fifth annual Los Angeles Wiknic has been rescheduled. As before, the location will be at Pan-Pacific Park (map) and will be held on Saturday, July 25, 2015 from 9:30am to 4pm or so. Please RSVP and volunteer to bring food or drinks if possible! I hope to see you there! —howcheng {chat} - via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:28, 7 July 2015 (UTC) Join our Facebook group here! To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list. | |
The Signpost: 08 July 2015
- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation annual plan released, news in brief
- In the media: Wikimania warning; Wikipedia "mystery" easily solved
- Traffic report: The Empire lobs back
- Featured content: Pyrénées, Playmates, parliament and a prison...
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
I've redirected the page because in its current state, it's unencyclopedic and promotional, due to the fact it was written, maintained and spammed by conflicted editors. I have no objections to a new article being created, but until it is, then I believe it should just be a redirect. Nothing against the place, just against the current article. Joseph2302 (talk) 23:12, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
- Your deletion has been opposed. Request a deletion but you don't immediately delete an article. You should have requested citations first. The mall is notable. JOJ Hutton 23:16, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
- Undisclosed paid editing should be deleted. I was being bold, as I believe it was the best course of action. I'm fine with you reverting me. If you do, I'll just put them up for deletion or stubify them, per WP:VERIFY. The fact is that dodgy accounts have been creating and maintaining these articles, and I'm trying to do what I believe is best for the article, which is to remove spam. Joseph2302 (talk) 23:27, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
- Unless you have proof of that, you are only speculating. And the last time I checked, paid editing was NOT against any Wikipedia policy that I am aware of.--JOJ Hutton 23:28, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
- Last time I checked, spamming promotional/unverified content was, WP:NOTADVERTISING and WP:VERIFY. Joseph2302 (talk) 23:32, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
- Unless you have proof of that, you are only speculating. And the last time I checked, paid editing was NOT against any Wikipedia policy that I am aware of.--JOJ Hutton 23:28, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
- Undisclosed paid editing should be deleted. I was being bold, as I believe it was the best course of action. I'm fine with you reverting me. If you do, I'll just put them up for deletion or stubify them, per WP:VERIFY. The fact is that dodgy accounts have been creating and maintaining these articles, and I'm trying to do what I believe is best for the article, which is to remove spam. Joseph2302 (talk) 23:27, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
COI in Wikipedia
You seem to be unaware of issues around COI/paid editing in WP.... happy to discuss if you have any questions. Jytdog (talk) 23:38, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
- Also, I'm done trying to fix issues surrounding the COI spammers and shopping malls, because I know you'll just revert it. Joseph2302 (talk) 23:40, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
- Will you please discuss the issues rather than edit warring? We ~can~ talk, you know! Jytdog (talk) 00:02, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Stop deleting articles and removing content. And do not re-add PRODs once they have been removed. JOJ Hutton 00:04, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- My offer to talk through things still stands btw. Let me know if you want to. Jytdog (talk) 14:57, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- COI and advertising is a problem, but you are going about it entirely the wrong way. Stop deleting content simply because there isn't a current citation. Request a citation before removing content, that is why there are "citation needed" tags. Don't strip articles of all of their content while at the same attempting to have them deleted. Thats about all I have to say. There is no pint in having a back and forth conversation until you follow these simple guidelines, because deleting content based on COI concerns while at the same time ignoring the objections of others, doesn't make you a hero, it makes you disruptive--JOJ Hutton 16:24, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for replying. I've tried to open discuss several times and when you have responded, it was once and done. I understand you have strong views on this - clearly - but are you interested in discussion? Discussion and trying to reach consensus are the heart of this place. Do let me know.Jytdog (talk) 16:34, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- COI and advertising is a problem, but you are going about it entirely the wrong way. Stop deleting content simply because there isn't a current citation. Request a citation before removing content, that is why there are "citation needed" tags. Don't strip articles of all of their content while at the same attempting to have them deleted. Thats about all I have to say. There is no pint in having a back and forth conversation until you follow these simple guidelines, because deleting content based on COI concerns while at the same time ignoring the objections of others, doesn't make you a hero, it makes you disruptive--JOJ Hutton 16:24, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Will you please discuss the issues rather than edit warring? We ~can~ talk, you know! Jytdog (talk) 00:02, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 15 July 2015
- Op-ed: On paid editing and advocacy: when the Bright Line fails to shine, and what we can do about it
- Traffic report: Belles of the ball
- WikiProject report: What happens when a country is no longer a country?
- News and notes: The Wikimedia Conference and Wikimania
- Featured content: When angels and daemons interrupt the vicious and intemperate
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
The Bugle: Issue CXII, July 2015
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:34, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 22 July 2015
- From the editor: Change the world
- News and notes: Wikimanía 2016; Lightbreather ArbCom case
- Wikimanía report: Wikimanía 2015 report, part 1, the plenaries
- Traffic report: The Nerds, They Are A-Changin'
- WikiProject report: Some more politics
- Featured content: The sleep of reason produces monsters
- Gallery: "One small step..."
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
The Signpost: 29 July 2015
- News and notes: BARC de-adminship proposal; Wikimania recordings debate
- Recent research: Wikipedia and collective intelligence; how Wikipedia is tweeted
- In the media: Is Wikipedia a battleground in the culture wars?
- Featured content: Even mammoths get the Blues
- Traffic report: Namaste again, Reddit
Hey
Apologize for being an anti vaccine pov pusher. This site is supposed to about truth not your bias against vaccines. Curse of Fenic was right about you. He is right you are wrong and you owe him an apology. Fix the Disneyland article or I will. GhostLight1 (talk) 06:13, 2 August 2015 (UTC)