Scorewriter: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎History: Added mention of software under development at Steinberg
Line 20: Line 20:


By 2000 the market was dominated by Finale (particularly in the US) and Sibelius (which had dominated the UK since 1993, and had expanded worldwide since its Windows release in 1998). Inexpensive programs such as [[Capella (notation program)|capella]] gained a significant share of the market in some countries, but in later years [[Musescore]] and [[Scorecloud|ScoreCloud]] have become popular worldwide.{{cn|date=April 2015}} Sibelius and Finale still dominated the market as of 2012.<ref>Richard Sussman, Michael Abene, Mike Abene (2012) ''Jazz Composition and Arranging in the Digital Age'' [http://books.google.com/books?id=jFYWbdWmCQYC&pg=PR48-IA16 p.xlviii]</ref>
By 2000 the market was dominated by Finale (particularly in the US) and Sibelius (which had dominated the UK since 1993, and had expanded worldwide since its Windows release in 1998). Inexpensive programs such as [[Capella (notation program)|capella]] gained a significant share of the market in some countries, but in later years [[Musescore]] and [[Scorecloud|ScoreCloud]] have become popular worldwide.{{cn|date=April 2015}} Sibelius and Finale still dominated the market as of 2012.<ref>Richard Sussman, Michael Abene, Mike Abene (2012) ''Jazz Composition and Arranging in the Digital Age'' [http://books.google.com/books?id=jFYWbdWmCQYC&pg=PR48-IA16 p.xlviii]</ref>

In February 2013, [[Steinberg]] announced that it had hired the former core development team for Sibelius (who had been dismissed by Avid in 2012) to build a new scorewriter from the ground up.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Kirn|first1=Peter|title=FEB 20 2013 Sibelius Core Team Now at Steinberg, Building New Notation Tool|url=http://createdigitalmusic.com/2013/02/sibelius-core-team-now-at-steinberg-building-new-notation-tool/|website=Create Digital Music|accessdate=17 August 2015|date=20 February 2013}}</ref> Development is still ongoing as of 2015, with no release date yet on the horizon; however, the project has already led to an open standard for [[Unicode]] music font mapping, Standard Music Font Layout (SMuFL), and the development team keeps a blog discussing their progress, as well as the technical considerations involved in music notation.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Rothman|first1=Philip|title=An interview with Daniel Spreadbury|url=http://www.sibeliusblog.com/people/an-interview-with-daniel-spreadbury/|website=Sibelius Blog|accessdate=17 August 2015|archiveurl=12 February 2015}}</ref>


==Functionality==
==Functionality==

Revision as of 00:55, 17 August 2015

A scorewriter, or notation software or music notation processor, is software used for creating sheet music. A scorewriter is to music notation what a word processor is to text, in that they both allow fast corrections (undo), flexible editing, easy sharing (via the internet or compact storage media), and clean, uniform layout. In addition, most scorewriters are able to sound out and record the notes—especially useful for novice composers or when no musicians are readily available—making them, by the same analogy, both word processors and previsualization software.

Comparison with multitrack sequencer software

Multitrack sequencer software and scorewriters typically employ different methods for the input and display of music notation.

Scorewriters are based on traditional music notation, which originates from European classical music. They use graphical symbols representing durations in sound and silence, along with symbols for dynamics, articulations and tempo. Some even allow the user to import or create their own symbols for use in scoring.

Multitrack sequencer software typically uses a multi-track recorder metaphor as the main interface, consisting of multiple tracks and track segments. Individual tracks can be edited using a graphic notation in the form of a piano-roll guided input for the control of MIDI-based hardware or software instruments.

In addition to these two approaches, a third approach has emerged that combines the above two methods of score input into a digital audio workstation. This allows the user to score parts using traditional notation, using the graphic notation of the piano roll and to record acoustic or electronic instruments in real time alongside the existing scores.

In all three cases it is possible to use the computer keyboard and mouse for input control or to use a MIDI keyboard for data entry that is later edited using traditional notation or piano-roll based notation.

Some argue that the implementation of traditional notation in multitrack sequencer software and digital audio workstations is limited and inferior in contrast to engraving quality programs such as Finale, Sibelius, LilyPond and MuseScore.

History

The rapid growth of desktop computers in the 1980s caused the creation of dozens of early scorewriters during that decade (see List of scorewriters). However, during the 1990s many of these fell into disuse because they were less sophisticated or harder to use than newer programs, principally Finale and Sibelius, which both offered a wide range of sophisticated features, making them suitable for almost all kinds of music and for professional publishing.

By 2000 the market was dominated by Finale (particularly in the US) and Sibelius (which had dominated the UK since 1993, and had expanded worldwide since its Windows release in 1998). Inexpensive programs such as capella gained a significant share of the market in some countries, but in later years Musescore and ScoreCloud have become popular worldwide.[citation needed] Sibelius and Finale still dominated the market as of 2012.[1]

In February 2013, Steinberg announced that it had hired the former core development team for Sibelius (who had been dismissed by Avid in 2012) to build a new scorewriter from the ground up.[2] Development is still ongoing as of 2015, with no release date yet on the horizon; however, the project has already led to an open standard for Unicode music font mapping, Standard Music Font Layout (SMuFL), and the development team keeps a blog discussing their progress, as well as the technical considerations involved in music notation.[3]

Functionality

All scorewriters allow the user to input, edit and print music notation, to varying degrees of sophistication. They range from programs which can write a simple song, piano piece or guitar tab, to those that can handle the complexities of orchestral music, specialist notations (from early music to avant garde), and high-quality music engraving.

Music can usually be input using the mouse, computer keyboard, and/or a MIDI keyboard. Also a few will allow input by scanning scores using musical OCR, or by playing or singing into a microphone.

Most scorewriters also allow the music to be played back via MIDI or, in some cases, using virtual instruments, e.g. VST instruments or similar.In a virtual piano in the screen, can show the score and the key played in the keyboard (i.e. changing the colour) at the same time. Scorewriters are somewhat similar to sequencers (many of which can also write music notation up to a point), though scorewriters are used primarily for writing notation and sequencers primarily for recording and playing music.

Some scorewriters allow the printed output to be customized and fine-tuned to a considerable degree, as is required by publishers to produce high-quality music engraving and to suit their individual house style.

A few scorewriters allow users to publish scores on the Internet, where they can be (for example) played back, transposed, and printed out, perhaps for a fee.

Most scorewriters provide other musical functions such as transposing, or producing separate instrumental parts from a full score, or applying music transformations such as retrograde. Some can automatically create instrumental exercises and student worksheets. Some support plug-ins, often developed by users or other companies. Various features found in other types of program are also found in some scorewriters; these include version control (similar to a word processor's 'track changes' feature), importing and exporting graphics, Post-It-like sticky notes, etc.

File formats

Almost all scorewriters use their own file formats for saving files. Hence, in order to move notation between different scorewriters (or to/from other kinds of music software such as sequencers), most scorewriters can also import or export one or more standard interchange file formats, such as:

  • Standard MIDI File is supported by almost all scorewriters. However, as this format was designed for playback (e.g. by sequencers) rather than notation, it only produces approximate results and much notational information is lost in the process. If the score is to be presented a WAV file (rather than MIDI) may be made from the score to give a much more natural (and accurate) rendition of the written score.
  • MusicXML has in recent years become the standard interchange format for accurate notation.[4]
  • NIFF is a now-obsolete file format that was supported by a few scorewriters.[5]

Some can import and export to pdf, text (ascii), picture (png, svg) and sound (ogg).[citation needed]

There are also human-readable text-based formats such as ABC notation, LilyPond (.ly file extension) and ASCII tab. These are easily rendered as speech by screen reading software. The Score extension to MediaWiki can render, and generate an audio preview, of the first two formats.

See also

References

  1. ^ Richard Sussman, Michael Abene, Mike Abene (2012) Jazz Composition and Arranging in the Digital Age p.xlviii
  2. ^ Kirn, Peter (20 February 2013). "FEB 20 2013 Sibelius Core Team Now at Steinberg, Building New Notation Tool". Create Digital Music. Retrieved 17 August 2015.
  3. ^ Rothman, Philip. [12 February 2015 "An interview with Daniel Spreadbury"]. Sibelius Blog. Retrieved 17 August 2015. {{cite web}}: |archive-url= requires |archive-date= (help); Check |archiveurl= value (help)
  4. ^ "MusicXML Software". MakeMusic, Inc. 7 July 2012. Retrieved 2012-07-07.
  5. ^ Belkin, Alan (NIFF coordinator). (February 1992). "The Current Status of NIFF". Archived from the original on 2007-10-31. Retrieved 2007-11-06. Niff has now been superseded by MusicXML.

External links