Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of bowlers who have taken a wicket with their first ball in international cricket/archive2: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Yellow Dingo (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 90: | Line 90: | ||
*'''Support''' Great list, and the minor issues have been fixed. [[User:Joseph2302|<b style="color:#CCCC00">Joseph</b>]][[User talk:Joseph2302|<b style="color:#00FF00">2302</b>]] 15:48, 7 August 2016 (UTC) |
*'''Support''' Great list, and the minor issues have been fixed. [[User:Joseph2302|<b style="color:#CCCC00">Joseph</b>]][[User talk:Joseph2302|<b style="color:#00FF00">2302</b>]] 15:48, 7 August 2016 (UTC) |
||
;Source review: Sources are all OK - formatting good, spotchecks shown the information is supported and no copy vios. - [[User:SchroCat|SchroCat]] ([[User talk:SchroCat|talk]]) 07:18, 8 August 2016 (UTC) |
|||
{{FLCClosed|promoted}} - [[User:SchroCat|SchroCat]] ([[User talk:SchroCat|talk]]) 07:18, 8 August 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:18, 8 August 2016
List of bowlers who have taken a wicket with their first ball in international cricket (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Featured list candidates/List of bowlers who have taken a wicket with their first ball in international cricket/archive1
- Featured list candidates/List of bowlers who have taken a wicket with their first ball in international cricket/archive2
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): The Rambling Man (talk) 08:53, 24 May 2016 (UTC), Lugnuts (talk) 09:04, 24 May 2016
This is a nice list, well referenced and illustrated. A lot of the work has been put in by Chamal N, Lugnuts and Sahara4u but only Lugnuts is editing regularly. I'm sure between he and me, we can address all concerns. The Rambling Man (talk) 08:53, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Yep, count me in - I'll do my best to get another cricket-related star on my userpage! Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 09:04, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
You say "pot-aaa-to", and "I say pot-ahh-to" / you say "tom-aaa-to" and I say "'List of bowlers who have taken a wicket with their first ball in international cricket' isn't the best title"...
|
---|
|
- I've fixed the missing ODI names. TRM - can you take a look at the lead for the article? It states that Arthur Coningham was the first Test player, but the table/source states it's Tom Horan. There's a rather good source attached to Coningham, so I don't just want to butcher it! Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 11:29, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment – Can't we have separate pages for each format? 20, 22 and 12 seems like a reasonable fork. —Vensatry (talk) 05:38, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- I did mention that above, but Bencherlite felt that a single list was more appropriate. I'm not fussed either way. The Rambling Man (talk) 06:04, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- I'm not hellbent on that. Given that last six entries of the T20I table are from the last five years, it's more likely to grow. We can probably decide on this when the count reaches 20. —Vensatry (talk) 06:38, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- Sounds good to me, would you be able to review the list itself if you get time? Cheers. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:25, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- Sure, will review it before the weekend. —Vensatry (talk) 09:10, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment – I strongly disagree with a separate pages for each list. I prefer the way it is right now with a single list, it is much more appropriate. There is not much difference in the lead that could be written, and they are all thematically similar. Mattximus (talk) 15:18, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
- I support this too. Hopefully there's nothing major stopping this from being promoted up to FL. @Vensatry: - have you had the opportunity to review the list? Thanks in advance. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 13:50, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Resolved comments from —Vensatry (talk) |
---|
Comments from Vensatry
|
Source review
- "Only Maurice Tate, Intikhab Alam and Nathan Lyon went on to play in more than ten Tests" - Ref. missing for Lyon.
Done
- "The first to achieve this feat was Australian Michael Kasprowicz who took wickets with his first and second delivery in this format in 2005, dismissing New Zealand's Stephen Fleming and Mathew Sinclair." - You need to cite the 'second wicket' and 'Sinclair' parts.
Done
- Is 'cricketcountry.com' a RS? —Vensatry (talk) 12:04, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Spotchecks done for rest of the refs. in the lead - No issues.
- Refs. for the three tables (main) - Ted Arnold's first victim was Victor Trumper, not Reggie Duff.
Done
—Vensatry (talk) 16:28, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Vensatry: - apologies for the delay in getting back to you. I've now fixed everything per your comments above. I hope everything is now in order. Thanks again for reviewing this. @The Rambling Man: - please could you cast your eye over the article now, incase I've missed anything. Thanks! Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:57, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Vensatry: - re: the reliable source, I think it is, but in the avoidance of doubt, I've found a source from CricketArchive and replaced it. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 18:49, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Support, nice work. —Vensatry (talk) 06:27, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
- Support Two small changes I might recommend:
- 1. "Not all of these bowlers took their first wicket in their debut match." -> "Not all of these bowlers took their first wicket in their debut matches."
- 2. Perhaps you might check if photo captions should contain the stops at the end of the caption sentences. My support any which way. Lourdes 12:51, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
- I'm not sure I agree with the first, there are multiple bowlers but they each only have a single debut. As for the second comment, both captions are complete sentences (i.e. not fragments) so the use of the full stop is correct. Thanks for the support. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:00, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you. With respect to the "debut matches", I think I noticed a different usage in the next statement: "Clive Lloyd, Inzamam-ul-Haq, Sadagoppan Ramesh, and Martin van Jaarsveld did not bowl in their debut matches." So had an opinion that either it should be "match" in both statements or alternatively "matches". I may be wrong but and would defer to your opinion. Thanks and good work. Lourdes 16:47, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
- Support very nice looking list and, although looking hard, I couldn't find any issues except that maybe "no." should be defined in the key. - Yellow Dingo (talk) 12:08, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
- Question: The Rambling Man According to the sources on Flag of Australia, the current Australian flag was adopted in 1903, so the flag in the "For" column for Tom Horan and Arthur Coningham and in the "Against" column of Bill Bradley and Ted Arnold should be the Flag of None. Similarly, according to List of South African flags and [1], South Africa didn't have an official national flag in 1906, and the flag depicted came into use in 1928. Hence, the "For" column for Bert Vogler and the "Against" column for Jack Crawford should have the Flag of None, and the George Macaulay and Maurice Tate "Against" columns should have the 1912-28 flag. Joseph2302 21:37, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
- Comment; while I was going through this list fixing a few minor sorting issues; I found that in the T20I list there is further issues with numbers 5 & 6. When sorting by date either backwards or normally they are in the wrong order. The weird thing is they aren't the same date unlike the other issues I fixed. - Yellow Dingo (talk) 07:16, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
- Yellow Dingo, thanks. Sorry for not seeing these comments sooner. I'll look to address them tomorrow. Cheers. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:56, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Yellow Dingo all done. Tomorrow turned into next week. As is life. Cheers. The Rambling Man (talk) 15:46, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
- Looks good. I have supported further up this FLC. - Yellow Dingo (talk) 06:12, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support Great list, and the minor issues have been fixed. Joseph2302 15:48, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
- Source review
- Sources are all OK - formatting good, spotchecks shown the information is supported and no copy vios. - SchroCat (talk) 07:18, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. - SchroCat (talk) 07:18, 8 August 2016 (UTC)