User talk:Semsûrî

Disambiguation link notification for March 30

This terrorist fanboy is a vandal! It is changing words "terrorist" to "militant" erasing "USA designated list for terrorists". It erased kurdish attacks on civilians and sweden etc... I hope isis captures him :)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Reşvan (Kurdish tribe), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Justice and Development Party and Kulu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

feylis

I have written a post about this on the talk-page of the feyli. long has my post not been answered, therefore, it seems reasonable to make the switch, it's also relevant references that support that statement.--Didaku (talk) 15:26, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Hasakah

We cant use in this situation pro opposition source deSyracuse. And also pro Kurdish sources confirmed that those villages under control by Syrian troops not the under jointly control.here Hanibal911 (talk) 17:37, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Size of Turkey map

I notice that your Turkey map currently has just under 3000 points right now. My estimate is that you'll hit the parser's limit again somewhere around 5000 points. Do you have an idea of how many more points you expect to be adding, so I can start looking for another solution now if necessary? Jackmcbarn (talk) 15:08, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

@Jackmcbarn: Oh I see. Looking at the areas I haven't done yet, I would say about 2500-3000 points more is needed. --Ahmetyal (talk) 15:34, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. I just added a new size optimization. I now project that you won't hit any limits until 6500 points. By the way, why do you bother to set labels on marks if you just set their label_size to 0? Jackmcbarn (talk) 20:22, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Okay, thanks! With the labels, it will take a long time to remove them one by one, and the search/replace action is not available with a module. But you are right, I could stop adding them from now on. --Ahmetyal (talk) 20:39, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Oh, you meant the labels themselves and not the label_size. Skipping the labels would definitely make my work faster. --Ahmetyal (talk) 20:47, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

@Jackmcbarn: Does it overload the page/system? I'm not against skipping labels and label-sizes from now on. --Ahmetyal (talk) 20:48, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

They're not overloading the system. I'm just curious what the point is, since they do contribute to the page size, and they don't seem to be doing anything. Jackmcbarn (talk) 20:58, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

With labels it would be much easier to find the villages when needed. For example when the next election results come out and some marks need to be updated. --Ahmetyal (talk) 21:07, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

I've switched the labels to use position=none instead of label_size=0. Now they're still available when editing, but they won't render anything into the map itself. Jackmcbarn (talk) 21:17, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zaza people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Persians (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Pirsgirêka bikaranîna navan

Silav, di gotara Zazas de peyvên Kurd û Zaza li ba hev tê wê wateyê ku Zaza ne Kurd in. Dema te got zaza û kurdên sivîl, tê wê wateyê ku di nav wan kurdan de soran jî, kurmanc jî goran jî hebûn lê zaza nînbûn. Lewma divê wek Kurmanc û Zaza bê nivîsandin.--Gomada (talk) 12:33, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Please write in English. My reading skills aren't the best... --Ahmetyal (talk) 14:49, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Kobane

I see that you correct my mistake so I want say "thanks". Because I didnt notice that was mistaken. So thank you very much! Hanibal911 (talk) 20:06, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Minor barnstar
	This is a reward for your contribution to the improvement of this map Syrian Civil War detailed map Hanibal911 (talk) 20:12, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Your edit on the Iraqi map

On the Iraqi Map, you used this source to add a bunch of towns and say ISIS controls them.

http://www.akb.bzh/spip.php?article889&lang=fr

You used a map. The creator of this Iraqi insurgency map states this is against the rules on the Syria map, where vandalism has occurred using amateur, unreliable sources.

This person says: "Copying from maps is strictly prohibited."

The source you used

http://www.akb.bzh/spip.php?article889&lang=fr

is not a valid, trustworthy and reliable source, because it is an amateur map, from OpenStreetMap! Anyone can create that! There is no reliable evidence that ISIS holds these villages. It makes no sense! Even though the map you cited appears to be Kurdish, it is still unreliable, as it is an amateur map. Please revert your edits. Pbfreespace3 (talk) 23:40, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Thank you very much. Pbfreespace3 (talk) 23:52, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Cities and towns during the Syrian Civil War". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 18 July 2015.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 04:45, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Cities and towns in the war in Iraq and the Levant". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 19 July 2015.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 02:57, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Request for mediation rejected

The request for formal mediation concerning Cities and towns in the war in Iraq and the Levant, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 20:25, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

Not Sure about East Hasakah

I'm not sure that YPG did liberate those areas from ISIS. The operation near Hawl happened only near the border, according to reports, and the ISIS use of chemical weapons near Tel Brak, so I think ISIS might still be there. Or maybe YPG has liberated the area. I don't know. I wish there were better sources. I'm just saying that there's a good chance that someone reverts your edit. Pbfreespace3 (talk) 16:17, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

The only sources we have of that front are maps. On 2th August, this map was published[1], on 8th August [2] this map was published. Both these mappers are considered reliable by most of the wikimappers. Lastly we have this. I know that maps can be unprecise, but having three mappers having this part as YPG-controlled, should be enough to change it.--Ahmetyal (talk) 16:33, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Kurdish-majority provinces

Thanks, but this map is meant to reflect one specific source, the source provided in the description. If sources differ, and you want a map showing what another source says, I think it would be best if you'd upload a different map. Nyttend (talk) 00:54, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Portuguese singles chart

Yep, it is reliable. Hung Medien only recently started publishing the singles chart; previously they only published the top 30 of the albums chart. There's not a valid way to cite it using Template:Singlechart yet as someone hasn't added support for the Portuguese singles chart, but you can reference it manually. Ss112 20:48, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Bahoz Erdal

Thank you for the addition of information rather than pointless revert warring. I know this is kind of expected behavior but I have grown to resent editing current events over revert wars. Lets hope more clear information will come forward so that article is more stable. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 19:35, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Twitter as a source

Hello. You recently used Twitter post as a source. You do not seem to be aware so I'll like to bring to your knowledge that Twitter posts can't be used until they fulfill criteria of WP:SOCIALMEDIA. And the post you cited does not meet it. Please do not use posts of Twitter users as they aren't reliable. Instead try to find a post from a well-known organisation like that of news or human rights eg. the SOHR. Newsboy39 (talk) 14:33, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

User:Newsboy account is only up since 12 august 2016. It is most likely a sock puppit of a previously banned user, or a dubplicate account of an other user. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Newsboy39 --Niele~enwiki (talk) 07:58, 19 August 2016 (UTC)