Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elena Taube Bailey: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 19:52, 19 December 2016

Elena Taube Bailey

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject is credible. The article is well written, well sourced- sources from reputable magazines and newspapers such as, the East Bay Times. Subject is notable for efforts in the interfaith dialogue and Jewish Christian movement, for example, notable success in directly getting the National Cathedral in D.C. to permit Jewish Christian weddings, representing the cathedral in interfaith dialogue at the Washington Hebrew Congregation; Subject is notable for role in presidential campaigning and federal government. Unlike Brycehughes|Brycehughes notes, the Washingtonian is a reputable magazine, just like Vogue or Vanity Fair, so his bias on the Washingtonian magazine needs to be deleted or disregarded. The subject clearly has independent notability in the interfaith dialogue movement and federal government contributions.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Of all the sources in this article, only three mention the subject at all. Of those, one is an unreliable blog written by the person who officiated the subject's wedding and another is simply an index which points to the third source. The third source is an inside-the-beltway puff piece which in no way indicates the subject's notability. Article fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO in that the subject lacks significant coverage in reliable sources and lacks independent notability since there's no automatic inherited notability from anything or anyone else. Brycehughes (talk) 21:49, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I still concur my PROD, simply none of this is convincing to go against policy when there are such blatant concerns. SwisterTwister talk 21:53, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This reads like a fluff piece intended to make a non-notable person notable. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:57, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It looks like a lot of work went into this article, but I'm sorry to say that the subject lacks any notability. There's not one reliable source that discusses her in any depth. Almost all of the references are just links to to the homepages of various organizations related to her. There's no way we can keep this one. AlexEng^(TALK) 07:54, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ===[[:Elena Taube Bailey]]===
 {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}
+:({{Find sources AFD|Elena Taube Bailey}})
+Subject is credible. The article is well written, well sourced- sources from reputable magazines and newspapers such as, the East Bay Times. Subject is notable for efforts in the interfaith dialogue and [[Jewish Christian]] movement, for example, notable success in directly getting the [[National Cathedral]] in D.C. to permit Jewish Christian weddings, representing the cathedral in interfaith dialogue at the [[Washington Hebrew Congregation]]; Subject is notable for role in presidential campaigning and federal government. Unlike Brycehughes|Brycehughes notes, the Washingtonian is a reputable magazine, just like Vogue or Vanity Fair, so his bias on the Washingtonian magazine needs to be deleted or disregarded. The subject clearly has independent notability in the interfaith dialogue movement and federal government contributions.
 :{{la|Elena Taube Bailey}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elena Taube Bailey|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 December 16#{{anchorencode:Elena Taube Bailey}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Elena_Taube_Bailey Stats]</span>)