Talk:Aam Aadmi Party

Semi Protect it urgently

Kindly semi protect this page urgently. APCO team from Bharatiya Janata Party is spamming with wrong information and spreading it via Twitter and Facebook.

Election opinion polls

Aside from being useless navel-gazing, putting election opinion poll data in party articles is plain daft. Such polls cover all parties and should be in an article about the election itself, if they really must be included on Wikipedia at all. - Sitush (talk) 21:16, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aam Aadmi Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150103213526/http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/newdelhi/with-new-faces-and-young-team-aap-hits-campaign-trail/article1-1303093.aspx to http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/newdelhi/with-new-faces-and-young-team-aap-hits-campaign-trail/article1-1303093.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:40, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Noteworthy practices

I have just removed a section titled Noteworthy Practices. Aside from the minor point that it would need changing to comply with WP:MOSHEAD, it is just another list within the article that really adds nothing to it other than an apparent attempt to puff up the AAP with favourable trivia. Such material, if genuinely encyclopaedic and discussed by multiple independent sources, should be incorporated into the prose at the relevant points. One-off practices are rarely notable because they are likely to be less of a practice and more of a political stunt. - Sitush (talk) 05:12, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Is Axis Bank Fake Accounts and Black Money Linked to Arvind Kejriwal and Aam Aadmi Party???

How much truth is in this allegation?

http://postcard.news/axis-bank-fake-accounts-black-money-linked-arvind-kejriwal-aam-aadmi-party/

Not sure that I care. It is an allegation published on some website I've never heard of before. Wild claims are particularly common in Indian politics, so the default position is to be suspicious of them unless noted by very strong sources. - Sitush (talk) 17:30, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Funding

I removed some stuff about funding here. It seems to be fairly trivial but if it does deserved a mention then it would be better done either by having a longer section that discusses the funding of the party more generally or by incorporating this tiny piece of information within an existing section. We discourage very short sections such as this was. - Sitush (talk) 17:29, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

A longer section is needed and I was working on that before you reverted my edit. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 17:46, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

There is already some stuff about funding in there - re: NRIs, I think - so perhaps that needs to be merged. Go ahead and write. I'll polish it up if necessary because what you had written sounded almost like point-scoring and we've had a lot of that on this article. It is important that we put things in context and yet do not get bogged down in trivia (which is why I removed the stuff you added regarding advertising spend). I also think we may soon need to consider separating the government(s) from the party, as we do for some other states/parties. - Sitush (talk) 18:03, 14 March 2017 (UTC)