User talk:Escargoten

File permission problem with File:Flag of Lostisland.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Flag of Lostisland.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:02, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Предупреждение

Не смейте обвинять меня в вандализме и лгать в описании правки, иначе я обращусь к админам. Vyacheslav84 (talk) 12:13, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Не беспокойтесь, я сам обращусь к ним. --Escargoten (talk) 14:42, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Очень хорошо раз такое существо как ты понимает только язык санкций будем говорить на ЗКА. Vyacheslav84 (talk) 15:19, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

February 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  JodyB _talk 15:53, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

May 2015

Hello, I'm ToonLucas22. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Liberland  with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. TL22 (talk) 20:52, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Try and refrain from editing against consensus, which you did on Liberland. 'Explaining' does not give you a free ball. The Jolly Bard (talk) 21:27, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Says the guy who just violated the 3RR. --Escargoten (talk) 21:28, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

I share that opinion about those 2 other micronations, be free to rejoin the discussion! --Lyam Desmet (talk) 16:02, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

December 2017

Hello, I'm Meters. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:Matthew and Hunter Islands that didn't seem very civil,. I suggest that you remove it. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Meters (talk) 00:22, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Hello. Your recent edit to List of micronations appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Meters (talk) 00:28, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Matthew and Hunter Islands. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. You added it, it was removed, and it is under discussion on the talk page. Don't restore it unless there is consensus on the talk page that it should go in the article. Meters (talk) 00:07, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Talk:Matthew and Hunter Islands. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Meters (talk) 07:09, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Calling an editor certifiably incompetent is a personal attack. Remove it or I will. Meters (talk) 07:12, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Not sure how is this an attack, when User:Ckatz said that on that very talk page that those who disagree with him have "low-volume accounts" nobody seems to have given a damn. To compare micronations with SCA Kingdoms is a sign of user's incompetence on the matter, and I'm not going to censor myself after having spent last 10 years researching micronations and micronationalism. --Escargoten (talk) 15:24, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

My statement was not a personal attack; it was an observation that (IIRC) the account in question did not have many edits and or seemed to exist for one specific purpose. This is a common problem on Wikipedia. As for your actions in recent days, it is important to understand that you are not entitled to repeatedly add material to the article when its veracity or notability has been called into question. Instead, the issue should be resolved on the talk page. If the outcome is not to your satisfaction, you can always appeal for more input but you cannot ignore the consensus and keep restoring your preferred text. Ckatz^chat_spy 22:43, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

There is a large difference between suggesting that someone lacks competence in an area, and stating that they are "certifiably incompetent". Calling an editor mentally incompetent is a personal attack. I've redacted the statement. Don't restore it. Meters (talk) 08:02, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

This is exactly what I said, that he lacks competence in the field of micronations – I never suggested that he’s mentally incompetent. Sorry if this wasn’t clear enough, English is not my first language.--Escargoten (talk) 12:13, 18 December 2017 (UTC)