Jump to content

Talk:The Laird o' Cockpen: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 821350932 by Eric Corbett (talk). And the impotance notification is inactive in WPSongs.
Eric Corbett (talk | contribs)
Undid revision 821354066 by Richhoncho (talk) please do try not to be a pedantic idiot
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject Scotland|class=start|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Scotland|class=start|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProjectSongs|class=start|needs-infobox=y|listas=Laird o' Cockpen}}
{{WikiProjectSongs|class=start|importance=low}}


== Layout on a mobile device ==
== Layout on a mobile device ==

Revision as of 00:45, 20 January 2018

WikiProject iconScotland Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconSongs Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Layout on a mobile device

The forced two-column layout is nearly impossible to read on a mobile device. I attempted to fix this, but my edits were reverted. please suggest a fix here. Frietjes (talk) 13:53, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are being, at best, disingenuous. Take a look at your "fix" again, which had the effect of constraining the table to a maximum width of 100em for all users, which looks ridiculous.
{| class="wikitable" style="font-size:90%; width:90%; max-width:100em; margin:2em auto 1em auto;"
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Eric Corbett (talkcontribs) 18 January 2018 (UTC)
then remove the max-width:100em. that seemed reasonable considering that poem itself is only 35em (we aren't talking about px units). are there other problems with accommodating for mobile browser windows? Frietjes (talk) 20:19, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Apart from the fact that I can't be arsed do you mean? Eric Corbett 21:20, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, and the max-width parameter is there for the benefit of those readers with a wide monitor. Eric Corbett 21:28, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
right, so we should be using px units and not em units? Frietjes (talk) 21:29, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Why? Eric Corbett 00:08, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
is your monitor 1000em wide or 1000px wide? Frietjes (talk) 00:32, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Neither. But we're talking about the maximum width of the table display anyway, not how it looks on my monitor. Eric Corbett 00:50, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I've had a look at this on four different screen sizes, including mobile; it is easily read in the current two column format on all my devices. SagaciousPhil - Chat 15:43, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Sagaciousphil, this is what it looks like on my phone: File:The Laird o' Cockpen on Samsung phone.png. if the notes would automatically drop below the main text on a narrow screen, the text would much easier to read. I don't know if it can be accomplished with {{div col}} using something like User:Frietjes/LoC1 or if {{col-float}} would work. Frietjes (talk) 20:57, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]