Jump to content

Talk:Jill Freedman: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Oopsie!
→‎Other permanent collections: Strike out, I added this one. Added before I saw this talk page list.
Line 9: Line 9:
Often described as possessing prints by JF:
Often described as possessing prints by JF:
* [[George Eastman Museum]]: Yes, it has four prints. (Try [http://collections.eastman.org/advancedsearch here].)
* [[George Eastman Museum]]: Yes, it has four prints. (Try [http://collections.eastman.org/advancedsearch here].)
* [[Smithsonian American Art Museum]]: Yes, it has one print and one folder. (Try [http://collections.si.edu/search/results.htm?q=Freedman%2C+Jill&tag.cstype=all here].)
* <strike>[[Smithsonian American Art Museum]]: Yes, it has one print and one folder. (Try [http://collections.si.edu/search/results.htm?q=Freedman%2C+Jill&tag.cstype=all here].)</strike>
* [[Museum of Fine Arts, Houston]]: Yes, it has three prints. (Try [https://collections.mfah.org/art/search?q=Freedman here].)
* [[Museum of Fine Arts, Houston]]: Yes, it has three prints. (Try [https://collections.mfah.org/art/search?q=Freedman here].)
* Jewish Museum, New York, NY: Two prints: http://thejewishmuseum.org/collection/search?artist=Jill%20Freedman%2C%20American%2C%20b.%201939
* Jewish Museum, New York, NY: Two prints: http://thejewishmuseum.org/collection/search?artist=Jill%20Freedman%2C%20American%2C%20b.%201939

Revision as of 05:03, 10 October 2019

Other permanent collections

Often described as possessing prints by JF:

-- Hoary (talk) 01:05, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Magnum

This Magnum page says that JF became a "Named Photographer" at Magnum Photos in 1975 and a "Nominee" in 1976; however, for the latter it refers the reader to this page, where I (mis)understand that "Jill Freedman is invited and accepted as Nominee" was something entered here "By Anonymous (not verified)". Now, "Anonymous (not verified)" has been responsible for a lot of additions to that website (e.g. for the years of ascension of Mary Ellen Mark, so there's nothing particularly fishy about the info for JF. Chances are, it was posted by somebody who'd been conscientious. But I'm reluctant to cite it. -- Hoary (talk) 06:18, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]