Jump to content

The Great Hack: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
Line 74: Line 74:
</ref> Calling the film "A Terrifying Warning" and "The Most Important Doc This Year," [[Refinery29|Refinery 29]] states "''The Great Hack'' makes clear just how deep that shady surveillance can – and does – go."<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.refinery29.com/en-gb/the-great-hack-netflix-documentary|title=We're Going To Be Talking About 'The Great Hack' Documentary For A Long Time|last=Kopotsha|first=Jazmin|website=www.refinery29.com|language=en-GB|access-date=2019-11-27}}</ref>
</ref> Calling the film "A Terrifying Warning" and "The Most Important Doc This Year," [[Refinery29|Refinery 29]] states "''The Great Hack'' makes clear just how deep that shady surveillance can – and does – go."<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.refinery29.com/en-gb/the-great-hack-netflix-documentary|title=We're Going To Be Talking About 'The Great Hack' Documentary For A Long Time|last=Kopotsha|first=Jazmin|website=www.refinery29.com|language=en-GB|access-date=2019-11-27}}</ref>


It was nominated for Best Documentary by the [[British Academy of Film and Television Arts]] and Best Writing by the International Documentary Association.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.eonline.com/news/1118604/bafta-film-awards-2020-the-complete-list-of-winners |title=BAFTA Film Awards 2020: The Complete List of Winners |date= 2020-02-02 |website=E! Online |accessdate=2020-02-06}}</ref> The documentary received an Outstanding Achievement in Graphic Design or Animation Award from [[Cinema Eye Honors]].<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://cinemaeyehonors.com/eligible-films/the-great-hack/ |title=The Great Hack |date=2019-11-04 |website=The 2020 Cinema Eye Honors for Nonfiction Filmmaking |language=en-US |access-date=2020-02-06}}</ref>
It was nominated for Best Documentary by the [[British Academy of Film and Television Arts]] and Best Writing by the International Documentary Association.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.eonline.com/news/1118604/bafta-film-awards-2020-the-complete-list-of-winners |title=BAFTA Film Awards 2020: The Complete List of Winners |date= 2020-02-02 |website=E! Online |accessdate=2020-02-06}}</ref> The documentary received an Outstanding Achievement in Graphic Design or Animation Award from [[Cinema Eye Honors]].<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://cinemaeyehonors.com/eligible-films/the-great-hack/ |title=The Great Hack |date=2019-11-04 |website=The 2020 Cinema Eye Honors for Nonfiction Filmmaking |language=en-US |access-date=2020-02-06}}</ref>. Finally, it was nominated by [[Cinema for Peace]] for the Most Valuable Documentary of the Year 2020 <ref>https://www.cinemaforpeace-foundation.org/nominations-2020</ref>.


==References==
==References==

Revision as of 10:47, 19 March 2020

The Great Hack
Directed byKarim Amer
Jehane Noujaim
Written byKarim Amer
Erin Barnett
Produced byKarim Amer
Jehane Noujaim
StarringCarole Cadwalladr
David Carroll
Brittany Kaiser
Distributed byNetflix
Release dates
  • January 26, 2019 (2019-01-26) (Sundance Film Festival)
  • July 24, 2019 (2019-07-24)
Running time
113 minutes
CountryUnited States

The Great Hack is a 2019 documentary film about the Facebook–Cambridge Analytica data scandal, produced and directed by Jehane Noujaim and Karim Amer, both previous documentary Academy Award nominees (The Square, Control Room, Startup.com).[1][2] The film's music was composed by EMMY Nominated Film Composer Gil Talmi. The Great Hack premiered at the 2019 Sundance Film Festival in the Documentary Premieres section and was released by Netflix on July 24, 2019.[3]

The documentary focuses on Professor David Carroll of Parsons and The New School, Brittany Kaiser (former business development director for Cambridge Analytica), and British investigative journalist Carole Cadwalladr. Their stories interweave to expose the work of Cambridge Analytica in the politics of various countries, including the United Kingdom's Brexit campaign and the 2016 U.S. elections. 

Background

SCL Group was a private research and strategic communications company interested in studying and influencing mass behavior. With alleged expertise in Psychological Operations (PsyOps), the company worked in military and political operations around the world in the late 1990s, including electioneering in the developing world throughout the early 2000s. To do business involving U.S. elections, a subsidiary, Cambridge Analytica, was formed in 2012.

In 2015, Cambridge Analytica, a UK-based political consulting firm, began working on behalf of Ted Cruz's campaign to win the 2016 Republican nomination. It used Facebook as a means for "political-voter surveillance" through the collection of user data points. After Cruz dropped out of the race, Cambridge Analytica used the same strategies, which later became a source of controversy, to aid Donald Trump's 2016 U.S. presidential bid. Independent investigations into data mining, along with whistle-blower accounts of the firm's impact on Brexit, led to a scandal over the influence of social media in political elections.

In the film, the Cambridge Analytica scandal is examined through the eyes of several involved persons.[4]

The scandal

Cambridge Analytica, the firm responsible for the scandal, was dedicated to big data. The data which was collected was meant to be used as part of a sales strategy that involved creating massive campaigns that approached users in a personal manner. The results of this campaign ended up disrupting U.S. and UK politics and led to claims of complicity of social media enterprises such as Facebook.

The illicit harvesting of personal data by Cambridge Analytica was first reported in December 2015 by Harry Davies, a journalist for The Guardian. He reported that Cambridge Analytica was working for United States Senator Ted Cruz and used data harvested from millions of people's Facebook accounts without their consent.[5] Facebook refused to comment on the story other than to say it was investigating. Further reports followed in the Swiss publication Das Magazin by Hannes Grasseger and Mikael Krogerus (December 2016), (later translated and published by Vice), Carole Cadwalladr in The Guardian (starting in February 2017) and Mattathias Schwartz in The Intercept (March 2017). Brittany Kaiser, former director of Business Development at Cambridge Analytica, revealed that everything published involving Cambridge Analytica in the Brexit campaign and Ted Cruz' campaign was true.

The scandal reached a point where even Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook's founder, had to testify officially in front of a special committee from the United States.[6]

Synopsis

When Cambridge Analytica's former CEO Alexander Nix was exposed on Channel 4 as claiming to have 5,000 data points on every American voter, Professor David Carroll took notice. He undertook a legal journey to try to reclaim his data with the help of lawyer Ravi Naik of ITN Solicitors, an expert on data privacy in the United Kingdom.[7] Because Cambridge Analytica processed user data via SCL in Britain, Carroll's complaints fell under British jurisdiction. On July 4, 2017, Carroll filed a complaint with the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) of the U.K. His case became the only criminal action retaken SCL Elections Limited. As a result, SCL was fined £15,000 for a lack of compliance with the ICO. Also, as a result, Facebook paid £500,000 for a "lack of transparency and security issues relating to the harvesting of data constituting" in the related scandal.

During Carroll's legal battle, SCL filed for bankruptcy. Cambridge Analytica's work was found to violate U.K. privacy laws. The ICO released a statement saying, "Had SCLE still existed in its original form, our intention would have been to issue the company with a substantial fine for severe breaches of principle one of the DPA1998 for unfairly processing people's data for political purposes including purposes connected with the 2016 U.S. Presidential campaigns."[8]

While David Carroll's journey unfolds, the investigative journalist Carole Cadwalladr continues her work into the influence of Cambridge Analytica.[9] This work leads her to whistle-blower Christopher Wylie, who explains how micro-targeting, combined with mass-harvesting of data, was used to influence elections. Cadwalladr's exclusive interviews with Wylie in The Observer reveal how psychographic profiling tactics were carried out with user data scraped from Facebook with the help of Cambridge Professor Aleksandr Kogan.[10] These allegations take the Cambridge Analytica scandal public and lead Wylie to testifying in U.K. Parliament and mentioning the name of a former director at Cambridge Analytica, Brittany Kaiser. A polarizing yet essential part of the Cambridge Analytica scandal, Wylie penned a tell-all called Mindf*ck in 2019.[11]

The filmmakers track down Brittany Kaiser in Thailand, where she considers becoming a whistle-blower and making information about Cambridge Analytica public, or dodging press inquiries and questions. With the help of British-born social entrepreneur, writer, and organizer Paul Hilder, she decides to go back to Washington, D.C., to come clean. With the help of specific documents from her personal Cambridge Analytica archives, Kaiser explains the effective micro-targeting of unsuspecting individuals, whom she calls "persuadable," by Cambridge Analytica in the 2016 U.S. elections.

Cast

  • Carole Cadwalladr, British investigative journalist and feature writer for The Observer.
  • David Carroll, associate professor of media design at the Parsons School of Design at The New School who filed a formal complaint against Cambridge Analytica under the U.K. Data Protection of 1998 to obtain his data, profile and score.[12]
  • Brittany Kaiser, former business development director of SCL Group, the parent company of Cambridge Analytica.
  • Julian Wheatland, former COO & CFO of Cambridge Analytica and SCL.
  • Roger Mc Namee, fund manager and venture capitalist, an early investor in Facebook.
  • Christopher Wylie, former director of research at Cambridge Analytica and whistle-blower.

Reception

The Great Hack holds an 88% "Fresh" (63% the user score) on Rotten Tomatoes based on 50 reviews, with the consensus being, "The Great Hack offers an alarming glimpse of the way data is being weaponized for political gain—and what it might mean for future elections."[13] Peter Bradshaw writing in The Guardian said the film concerned "the biggest scandal of our time: the gigantic question mark over the legality of the Brexit vote" and awarded it five stars.[14] Calling the film "A Terrifying Warning" and "The Most Important Doc This Year," Refinery 29 states "The Great Hack makes clear just how deep that shady surveillance can – and does – go."[15]

It was nominated for Best Documentary by the British Academy of Film and Television Arts and Best Writing by the International Documentary Association.[16] The documentary received an Outstanding Achievement in Graphic Design or Animation Award from Cinema Eye Honors.[17]. Finally, it was nominated by Cinema for Peace for the Most Valuable Documentary of the Year 2020 [18].

References

  1. ^ "Netflix documentary The Great Hack turns the Cambridge Analytica scandal into high drama". The Verge. July 8, 2019.
  2. ^ "Stream It Or Skip It: 'The Great Hack' On Netflix, A Documentary About How Cambridge Analytica Mined Our Personal Data And Who Blew The Whistle". Decider. Retrieved August 5, 2019.
  3. ^ "Netflix's The Great Hack Brings Our Data Nightmare to Life". Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 2019-09-13 – via www.wired.com.
  4. ^ "'The Great Hack': Film Review - Sundance 2019". The Hollywood Reporter. July 8, 2019.
  5. ^ Davies, Harry (December 11, 2015). "Ted Cruz campaign using firm that harvested data on millions of unwitting Facebook users". the Guardian. Archived from the original on February 16, 2016.
  6. ^ Wong, Julia Carrie (2018-03-22). "Mark Zuckerberg apologises for Facebook's 'mistakes' over Cambridge Analytica". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2019-11-13.
  7. ^ "One Man's Obsessive Fight to Reclaim His Cambridge Analytica Data". Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 2019-11-27.
  8. ^ "Investigation into the use of data analytics in political campaigns. A report to Parliament" (PDF). Information Commissioner's Office. 6 November 2018. Retrieved 2019-11-27.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  9. ^ Judah, Story by Ben (2019-09-19). "Britain's Most Polarizing Journalist". The Atlantic. ISSN 1072-7825. Retrieved 2019-11-27.
  10. ^ Cadwalladr, Carole (2018-03-18). "' I made Steve Bannon's psychological warfare tool': meet the data war whistle-blower". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2019-11-27.
  11. ^ Mindf*ck.
  12. ^ Paris, Martine. "What's My Score? Great Hack Star Says You Should Know". Forbes. Retrieved 2019-11-16.
  13. ^ The Great Hack at Rotten Tomatoes
  14. ^ Bradshaw, Peter (23 July 2019). "The Great Hack review – searing exposé of the Cambridge Analytica scandal". The Guardian. London, United Kingdom. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2019-07-31.
  15. ^ Kopotsha, Jazmin. "We're Going To Be Talking About 'The Great Hack' Documentary For A Long Time". www.refinery29.com. Retrieved 2019-11-27.
  16. ^ "BAFTA Film Awards 2020: The Complete List of Winners". E! Online. 2020-02-02. Retrieved 2020-02-06.
  17. ^ "The Great Hack". The 2020 Cinema Eye Honors for Nonfiction Filmmaking. 2019-11-04. Retrieved 2020-02-06.
  18. ^ https://www.cinemaforpeace-foundation.org/nominations-2020
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Great_Hack&oldid=946307589"