User talk:Elias Ziade

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Lebanon

A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Lebanon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:53, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Module:Probox1

A tag has been placed on Module:Probox1 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.

This also applies to Module:PHO. Whatever you are trying to do for Wikipedia:WikiProject_Phoenicia should not require the creation of 3 nearly identical modules. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 21:16, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Please stop

Hi Elie plus

I reverted your edits to Wikipedia:WikiProject Phoenicia/Members because thy were causing unintended disruption.

You have now twice reverted by my revert. If you do one more revert, it will be a WP:3RR issue which I will report.

Please do not reinstate the broken templates until they ae fixed, and stop violating WP:REDNOT. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 08:41, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Coding takes time. Your edits are not helpful I will report you for bullying if you continue with this. ~ Elias Z. (talkallam) 08:42, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

@BrownHairedGirl: PS: the page is fixed. NExt time use the talkpage! ~ Elias Z. (talkallam) 08:44, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Elie plus, I know that coding takes time. But that's not the issue here.

You reverted without fixing, and continued reverting without adding anything to your comment[1] that you would fix at some other time.

Your decision to revert without fixing,[2] and your choice not to communicate that changed your mind about when to do the fix are evidence of you being disruptive and unco-operative. If you want to try to misrerepresent your disruption and poor communication as "bullying", then go ahead ... but beware the WP:BOOMERANG.

Next time you create a problem which you don't want to fix, try taking your own advice and use the talk page rather than promptly reinstating the error which you had created. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 08:52, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

The error was on the module, I fixed the code causing the error while you were busy not looking at the page. Had you not reverted, twice, or had you checked the page you would have seen it was fixed. ~ Elias Z. (talkallam) 08:55, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Cut the gaslighting and the rewriting of history. You chose to say that you wouldn't fix it it now, and you chose not to communicate to me the fact that you had changed your mid about that. Your choice to then accuse me of "bullying" is a nasty, manipulative attempt to invert the reality that of your change of mind and your non-communication.

Wikipedia is a collaborative project. Take responsibility for your own uncollaborative actions and your won uncollaborative decision not to communicate effectively> Your choice to engage in passive aggression by blaming me for not noticing changes which you had chosen not communicate is nasty ... and your wholly bogus accusations of bullying are toxic. Cut it out. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 09:06, 6 October 2020 (UTC)