Jump to content

User talk:Favonian: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 49: Line 49:


But why Favonian? <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Natethegreat1966|Natethegreat1966]] ([[User talk:Natethegreat1966#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Natethegreat1966|contribs]]) 17:26, 11 January 2022 (UTC)</span> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
But why Favonian? <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Natethegreat1966|Natethegreat1966]] ([[User talk:Natethegreat1966#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Natethegreat1966|contribs]]) 17:26, 11 January 2022 (UTC)</span> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Dear Favonian
U are mean




Amogus

Revision as of 17:11, 12 January 2022

Puppy torture, or no puppy torture? It's a simple question...

If you say he didn't play a role in the puppy torture, I'll respect your (obviously wrong) opinion, and you won't hear another peep from me. Just have the bloody gonads to say it, have the courage of your convictions.

If, however, he DID play a role, I'm simply asking why such a significant aspect of his work deserves absolutely ZERO mention? Does that make sense to you?

105.49.234.216 (talk) 11:24, 6 January 2022 (UTC)dont_taze_my_ass_bro[reply]

You were told the reason on your talk page – and now you're blocked because you wouldn't listen. Favonian (talk) 12:15, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not to mention they’re evading a three month block for doing the same thing repeatedly. Acroterion (talk) 12:28, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I rather suspected as much ;) Favonian (talk) 12:29, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Which picture can I use???

I don't see why would you undo my edits?? Im just using the from the wikimedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.25.126.28 (talk) 11:33, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You were told so repeatedly on your talk page. As you have seen fit to remove those comments, you may have a look at this old version Favonian (talk) 11:45, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocking IP after only 1 edit

Hey! I noticed you blocked an IP for disruptive edit after it had only made one edit which appeared to be a test. May I ask what your reasoning was for such a quick block? ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:29, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Blaze Wolf: According to Special:Contributions/2601:2C7:400:2720:B181:A201:C9D3:2B64, it was a good deal more than one edit. Favonian (talk) 16:30, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
AH my bad! I had been looking at the revisions for their talk page instead of how many edits they had made. My brain is apparently a bit tired today lol. Sorry about that! ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:46, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On my talk Page

Dear Favonian What you said earlier last year on my Talk scared me into not editing Wikipedia again I am thinking that you are a threatening Administrator about the Pope John XII and Death articles

Yours Truly

Nathanthegret1966 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Natethegreat1966 (talkcontribs) 17:19, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Excess vertical space compressed Apparently that was the only way you could be made to pay attention to the warnings you were given. Favonian (talk) 17:24, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But why Favonian? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Natethegreat1966 (talkcontribs) 17:26, 11 January 2022 (UTC) Dear Favonian U are mean[reply]



Amogus