User talk:Starkex

This is the main talk page of the user: Starkex
and the user shall be contacted via this user-forum.
Talks regarding users performance and requests are to be mentioned here such as if the user violated an specific WikiPedia policy.
(Note: The user takes complaints from Administrators Seriously)

Alert

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

Your draft article, Draft:Sindhudesh Ji Dharti

Hello, Starkex. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sindhudesh Ji Dharti".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:38, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Reverting

Your numerous reverts in the last few hours are unreasonable and disruptive. You are aware that Sir Calculus (talk · contribs) is in some difficulties regarding policies and guidelines, with a range of experienced contributors raising issues. It looks to me as if you are intent on supporting Sir Calculus simply by reverting those who have objected, and in at least one case on utterly spurious grounds. It isn't a great idea. - Sitush (talk) 14:48, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Nabi Bakhsh Baloch being the completely spurious one. Please read the numerous edit summaries I have left there today. - Sitush (talk) 14:51, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

What I am doing is justified, I am backing no one here, the Information which you have mass-deleted specially in Nabi Baksh Baloch that without making request at talkpage and mass-blanking is violation of WP:CS further on other edits you have provided the reason for removal saying it violates WP:RAJ, well WP:RAJ isn't an official Wikipedian policy and it is suitable for Hindu-Indian tribes/varnas/castes and is pretty much irrelevant outside it, Please stop showing keen interest in articles regarding Pakistan if you have nothing better to do, further a third party is needed, (see WP:3O). Starkex (talk) 14:54, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

@Starkex that's really enraging. From where you deduced that WP:RAJ is only regarding Hindu varnas? Your behaviour is completely within WP:OWN as you just told @Sitush to stop editing Pakistan-related articles. Sutyarashi (talk) 15:10, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

You seem to be just echoing what Sir Calculus has said, with the same basic errors. Have you actually read the things you refer to? - Sitush (talk) Sitush (talk) 16:15, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Good old bullying @Sitush. Nice mass deleting content at Nabi Bakhsh Baloch's article. Starkex is right, RAJ is suitable for Indian Hindu related Varnas & castes & is irrelevant in Pakistani articles. But now it's at least clear your intentions are to mass delete Pakistan related content. Your RAJ friends' threats have also been delivered to me. Not very wikipedian of you to warn two Pakistanis while defending your Indian friend. Let's hope a neutral administrator takes a look at your profile. Because this is more than hateful from your side. Sir Calculus (talk) 17:29, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

July 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Also, please avoid colonial era sources for caste-related topics as they are considered unreliable. Thank you. Sutyarashi (talk) 15:03, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Daudpotra. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 15:32, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

+Template:Sindhi tribes — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 07:15, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

File:1972 Shimla Agreement.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:1972 Shimla Agreement.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 15:29, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Manners, 8th Earl of Rutland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bottesford.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:32, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

Khairpur (princely state)

Hi, do you know how to view past edit summaries at articles? Have you read the information at pages such as WP:V and WP:OVERCITE? You claim in your revert of me at Khairpur (princely state) that I ignored consensus, which is a claim you have mistakenly used against me on past occasions elsewhere - have you actually read WP:CONSENSUS?

If your edits in relation to me, both on articles and talk pages, are typical of your edits generally then I think you probably should take a look at WP:CIR. - Sitush (talk) 07:07, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

Once material has been given a citation needed tag, it should not be restored without reliable sources. I also note that you dated a source published around 1922 as published in 2006, making it look over 80 years newer than it is. The book is "Indian states : a biographical, historical, and administrative survey", see [1]. The 2006 date was when Asian Educational Services reproduced it. That's their specialty, anything from them should be assumed to be old. Doug Weller talk 10:19, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

This is the alert you should have been given the first time as it has more details.

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Doug Weller talk 10:10, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

BLP applicability and Contentious topics

You have recently made edits related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics.

This is related to your recent edits such as this. Please note: WP:BLP applies everywhere across Wikipedia. — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 13:06, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement topic ban

The following topic ban now applies to you:

You have been indefinitely topic banned from all pages and discussions concerning India, Pakistan, and/or Afghanistan.

You have been sanctioned for persistent disruptive and aggressive editing and persistent misunderstanding of WP:CONSENSUS, WP:RS and WP:RAJ.

This topic ban is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan#Final decision and, if applicable, the contentious topics procedure. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. Please read WP:TBAN to understand what a topic ban is. If you do not comply with the topic ban, you may be blocked for an extended period to enforce the ban.

If you wish to appeal the ban, please read the appeals process. You are free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Bishonen | tålk 13:21, 23 July 2023 (UTC)