User talk:Dangerous-Boy

Archives
February 2005 – March 2006 March 2006 - June 2006 July 2006 - November 2006 November 2006 - January 2007 January 2007 - March 2007

Leave a message

dont leave

Wikipedia needs people like you. Remeber a time when there was no content on Hinduism in Indonesia, Gedong Bagus Oka and Parisada Hindu Dharma ? Remember a time when Category:Hindu politicians was a small struggling cat? Remember a time when Category:Hindu monarchs had no members, its thanks to us that these cats and these areas are encyclopedic now, and will continue to be down the road.Bakaman 15:56, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

indonesia

We should start working on the Indonesian articles again. Tokoh Indonesia is a good resource. See id:Pengguna:Tokohbaka. The good part is that Sanskrit derived words are ok in Indonesian, making it easy for us to contribute, and its in Latin script. Mostly I add Category:Tokoh Hindu to pages.Bakaman 21:57, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

I have something for you!

Trampton has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Trampton 00:09, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Rwsage.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Rwsage.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:49, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Hindutva propaganda

What is your opinion on this, it's a phenomenon ripping Wikipedia apart from the seams, with fanatical supporters of Swami Vivekananda and his RSS revising history to make people believe lies. Think of all the children that enter Wikipedia and see this revisionist history and will need deprogramming in the future. I commend our maintsream admins. I support the neutrality and common non-OR sense of our admins. By the way, did you know that Swami Vivekananda himself used to write propaganda and publish it in Voice of India. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 58.178.139.138 (talk) 23:54, 3 April 2007 (UTC).

Christianity in Myanmar

A content dispute is not vandalism. Grow up. Chris 21:55, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

National stubs

Hi there,

Just a small suggestion: When you stubsort (such as you did in the article Hinduism in Tanzania), please include the national stub (Tanzania-stub in this case). Good work otherwise. Thanks--Thomas.macmillan 03:53, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Religious Articles

You've tagged a lot of religious articles, particularly, but not limited to Catholic articles, for lack of notability. Some of these might have been taken from the Catholic Encyclopedia. What do you expect for reference material? Explanation of religious organization is fairly basic to society. The articles could be much better referenced, I suppose. Do you have a good example someplace of what you are looking for?

For example, you have tagged the first Catholic diocese in the US, Baltimore, for lacking notability. Are you just tagging American dioceses? I am interested in your thoughts here. Are you looking for lots of footnotes? External references? Student7 20:58, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. The Jesus Christ article can have and has some "meat" in it, which banal organizations and towns and such, can't and shouldn't. There is no intellectuality to it. Not much to reference. Would church pubs be acceptable? I've done about all I can for online references to the sparse writeup on the Roman Catholic Diocese of Orlando. Removed some stuff I got out of a newspaper but failed to footnote. Student7 00:07, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Goa Inquisition

Please read the talk page. I have mentioned the reason for removing the section.--Deepak D'Souza (talk • contribs) 05:27, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

blocked

You have been blocked for meatpuppetry and sockpuppetry - please see this ANI report. Rama's arrow (just a sexy boy) 02:17, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dangerous-Boy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have not been editing any controversial articles for months. I've organizng christian articles. I find this indefinite block unacceptable since I have stayed away from anything controversial. I also have never engaged in sockpuppets or this so called "meat puppets." I do not associate with hkelkar. this comes out of no where. I helped bring the wikiprojects for hinduism and hindu mythology out of nothing. Started the hindu noticeboard, helped with bring the hinduism peer review and article of the week online. When warned by dagizza and rama, i ceased my activities from being controversial. Also, this accusation of me being a meat puppet for hkelkar is competely false. I've been here longer than hkelkar and do not edit the same articles as him. There is no evidence on this nor have I been presented any. I wasn't even notified that this was going block was about to happen. I've also never been blocked before and never have vandalized any articles. Seeing as this was not transparent it always goes against wiki policy that the user was never notified the action was going to happen.

Decline reason:

Sockpuppet of banned user // Pilotguy radar contact 18:54, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

odd considering I've had my account longer than the allegded banned user and have not used it for the same articles.--D-Boy 18:57, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

did you even bother to look at my edit history?--D-Boy 19:10, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

We've found out about Jesussucks D-Boy, give up. Your good contributions don't balance out your covert trolling activities with Hkelkar and the others. The only way someone will unblock you is if you provide evidence that you are not a meatpuppet of Hkelkar. Otherwise, the admins will continue to decline your requests and someone will protect this page. Gizza^{Chat ©} 01:26, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Trolling? you can see my edits for yourself. I've never used sock or meat puppets. you can check my ips. there is no evidence to give considering I have not been shown any. Also, I hear you are behind this witchhunt. shouldn't you be taking a break of some sort instead of harassing me? I've never shared any of my account with anyone. The most you can accuse me of is maybe on some stuff with baka and that I do by checking his contribution list. When you warned on civility, I left and started no trouble. this unblock is unreasonable for a first time block, not transparent, and goes against wiki policy and mostly everything wiki stands for. even the paks were notified when they were blocked the first time. Also, you're not that innocent yourself. you were involved with some us. you should do the right thing and give up your admin rights.--D-Boy 05:01, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

So some evidence would be nice....--D-Boy 17:12, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

RfAR

A request for arbitration has been filed concerning you. Rama's arrow (just a sexy boy) 21:28, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

That's great except for the simple fact that I CAN'T POST there since you blocked me for no reason! --D-Boy 21:31, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Your arbitration statement

Thank you for posting your statement on Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration. However, your references to violation of the First Amendment (which does not apply to Wikipedia, a private entity) and to notifying the Maryland State Attorney could be considered to violation the letter or spirit of WP:LEGAL, an important policy. Please revise your statement promptly to remove these. Thank you. Newyorkbrad 23:58, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Reblocked

You were unblocked only to participate in the arbitration case naming you. As you have returned to an article you previously edit-warred on [1] you have been reblocked. If an arbitration case is openend, you may post evidence here and it will be copied to the case by an arbitrator or clerk. Thatcher131 18:07, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

whatever.--D-Boy 18:09, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Let it be known that I was not advised of any restriction on my editing at the time of his original block. If the intention was or is that I can edit only the case pages then I should have been clearly notified of this.--D-Boy 18:25, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

You're correct. I don't see that Rama's Arrow imposed any restrictions when he unblocked you. I take no position on the allegations, so I am not prepared at this time to own your block myself, so I am unblocking you. Thatcher131 18:29, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Your comments

w.r.t your comments on AMbroodEY's talk page . I am fully aware that you are the creator of the article and that it shines in the list of articles you created.

Don't make cheeky comments such as these :Think about it. What would jesus do in your situation? You are deliberately trying to communalise what is a question of facts and biases.

Request you to chill out too. Practice what you preach! You and Baka reverted my removal of the Massacre of Muslims section even though you knew it shouldnt be there and provided a strange reason "referenced sources"? How does a referenced event from 1510 be included in an event that started in 1554?

As for calling Xandar a fanatic I will tell you what I told Amey : "Before you clear the dirt from your brother's eye, clear the dirt form your own eye". --Deepak D'Souza (talk • contribs) 05:20, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Change

• 21 December 2005
• 31 December 2006

It's change. You have to live with it.— Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:|]] ([[User talk:#top|talk]] • contribs)

Hi

Greetings from Bhadani. Please understand that if one is innocent nothing is going to happen except some stress. I request you to face the situation with a sense of optimism and please co-operate [2]. Regards. --Bhadani (talk) 15:39, 29 April 2007 (UTC)