Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 9: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 17:31, 9 April 2021

< April 8

April 10 >

April 9

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 9, 2021.

UNC-R

UNC-R → North Carolina State University (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

The abbreviation "UNC-R" has never been a correct name for NC State, and the usage of "UNC-R" is mostly a derogatory reference from rival schools who would already know how to find the article on Wikipedia under the correct name. I even checked the creator's user page, it indicates that he went to UNC-CH, which is usually the source of unwarranted references to "UNC-R". 2600:1700:FDF1:1FC0:D83F:388:E5D5:D1A5 (talk) 17:31, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Enola(Waterworld)

Enola(Waterworld) → Waterworld#Cast (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Malformed redirect with lack of space. Dominicmgm (talk) 13:01, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

London Buses route 659

London Buses route 659 → List of bus routes in London#600–699 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Non-existent London Bus route which has never ever existed before. Could be potentially speedy deleted but I'm taking it to RfD. Pkbwcgs (talk) 11:08, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

London Buses route 691

London Buses route 691 → List of bus routes in London#600–699 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Non-existent London Bus route from a quick search on the TfL website at [1]. May have existed in the past but currently doesn't exist. Pkbwcgs (talk) 11:05, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

According to the creation edit summary this was a school bus route, and is supposed to be targeting List of London school bus routes, which was deleted in 2009 following this AfD nomination. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 11:26, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

London Buses route N13

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Withdrawn. I have found an appropriate article to redirect this to. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 10:59, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

London Buses route N13 → List of bus routes in London#Former routes (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Former London Bus route which no longer exists. Makes no sense to redirect this to a list of current bus routes. There is no "former routes" section in the article which this bus route is being redirected to. Pkbwcgs (talk) 10:54, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

London Buses route 611

London Buses route 611 → List of bus routes in London (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Makes no sense to have a redirect called "London Buses route 611" when the 611 bus isn't a London Bus at all. A more sensible redirect would be something like Uno Buses Route 611 redirected to List_of_bus_routes_in_London#Non-TfL_bus_routes_in_Greater_London. Pkbwcgs (talk) 10:46, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note - From my analysis of Non-TfL bus routes, the 611 and the 614 below are the only bus route redirects which aren't TfL bus routes. There are no others. Pkbwcgs (talk) 10:50, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and refine to the "Non-TfL bus routes in Greater London" section. Plausible search term, and there is a bus route numbered 611 in the list. The vast majority of searcher's aren't going to know or care who the operator is, or that it isn't technically a London Buses route, they'll just be looking for information on bus route 611 that operates in London, and having one route that doesn't follow the standard naming pattern for the hundreds of other routes in the list is likely to be more confusing than helpful. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 11:35, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No because the other Non-TfL bus routes do not have redirects and it's implausible because London Buses do not operate the 611 bus. There is no London Buses route 420, London Buses route 515 or the other non-TfL bus routes in the list. Also, it's a rarely used search term. Pkbwcgs (talk) 14:03, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

London Buses route 614

London Buses route 614 → Uno (bus company) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Implausible redirect because the 614 bus isn't a London Bus route, it's a Hertfordshire bus route. Pkbwcgs (talk) 10:41, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Com.com

Com.com → CNET (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

As of 2021 http://com.com does no longer redirect to CNET but is instead parked. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 09:19, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The URL is mentioned at the target article, and as far as I can tell, that's the only place it's mentioned. There are a bunch of articles with faulty references like nytimes.com.com, so I might have overlooked something. - Eureka Lott 15:40, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 10:04, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chees

Chees → Cheese (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Recognising that April Fools is now over and that this is a proper RfD, this redirect should be deleted. It's tagged as a misspelling but it could refer to cheese, chess, cheers, etc. An alternative could be to retarget to Cheez but I prefer deletion. Anarchyte (talk • work) 05:05, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There's also the Chees (disambiguation) redirect, that might be worth bundling here. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 11:06, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Chee; the surname can have a plural, not sure if the others can, but any other significant uses can be mentioned there. Peter James (talk) 13:23, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 10:04, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DSV limiting Factor

DSV limiting Factor → DSV Limiting Factor (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing links to this redirect. The redirect is improperly capitalized (it's a ship's name). Renamed to [DSV Limiting Factor], seeking to delete this redirect. sbb (talk) 18:55, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. @Sbb: redirects generally aren't moved (WP:MOVEREDIRECT) but never mind. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:09, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as housekeeping per nominators rationale. Less Unless (talk) 16:38, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, miscapitalisations are perfectly plausible search terms. — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 04:10, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:58, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Does the Flower Bloom?

Does the Flower Bloom? → Does the Flower Blossom? (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

This is my first time nominating a redirect for discussion, so I apologize in advance if I'm doing something wrong. I was wondering if this redirect is valid? "Does the Flower Bloom?" is a fan-translated title for the series that seemed to have appeared when the live-action film was released despite "Does the Flower Blossom?" being used as a title since 2015. lullabying (talk) 06:44, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Muscle fiber

Muscle fiber → Skeletal muscle#Muscle fibers (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Muscle fibers → Skeletal muscle#Muscle fibers (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Muscle fibers, fast-twitch → Myocyte#Fiber types (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Muscle fibre → Myocyte (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Muscle fibres → Skeletal muscle (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
I've added some related redirects that MB found, but am still not sure what the best solution here is (other than that most of thse should probably point at th same place). Simply pointing to Muscle may be appropriate. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 01:28, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Target had been Myocyte for six years, recently changed w/o discussion. MB 18:28, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep In my medically uninformed assessment, the new target does appear to be more appropriate than the old one. MB, is there any specific issue that you have with the new target other than a procedural concern? _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:02, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rosguill, No, just a long standing redirect changed without discussion or much reason ("better target"). I am similarly uninformed and after looking at both articles wasn't sure and was trying to get a more expert opinion. Aren't muscle fibers found in all types of muscle, not just skeletal muscle? If so, why is the target an article on skeletal muscle rather than Myocyte which seems to be more broad. MB 20:29, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Given that the long-standing redirect was the product of a bot-correction of a double redirect, I wouldn't implicitly put much faith in the old redirect target, even if it has been around for 5 years. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:33, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 06:49, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Involved relist to add related redirects
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed,Rosguill ^talk 01:21, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as redirects for Myocyte. We had this discussion before "muscle fiber" /" muscle fibre" is a synonym of "muscle cell", which is the definition of myocyte. The redirection to Skeletal muscle leaves out the fact that muscle fibres/fibers occur in cardiac tissue as well as in skeletal muscle. It is also a vertebrate centric change. There are invertebrate animals (without skeletons) that have muscle fibers, but they do not have skeletons and therefore have no skeletal muscle. The undiscussed change to the redirect is unwarranted. Also, it is not clear what the previous "keep" vote is for. None of these redirects are up for deletion are they? The term "muscle fiber" / "muscle fibre" is extremely common in the literature, so deletion or the redirects would not make sense. --EncycloPetey (talk) 01:43, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as is - muscle cell still redirects to myocyte ; the redirects were made in accordance with the MeSH entry which distinguishes between myocyte and muscle fiber still referring to myocyte for cardiac muscle cell.^[1] Do invertebrates have muscle cells or muscle fibers? As far as I can see a muscle fiber only refers to a skeletal muscle cell. Otherwise this could be mentioned in Other animals.--Iztwoz (talk) 16:39, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Muscle tissue consists of elongated cells also called as muscle fibers - taken from muscle tissue page.--Iztwoz (talk) 16:46, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Multiplikator

Multiplikator → Multiplication (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Multiplikand → Multiplication (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

These were mass-created by a script, and might fall afoul of WP:RFOREIGN, since multiplication doesn't have a special connection to German. Delete them unless a justification can be provided. Regards, SONIC⁶⁷⁸ 00:00, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, no connection to the language. The editor who made this made about 500 of these redirects with a bot, which I've slowly been sorting through. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 08:40, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. D.Lazard (talk) 09:23, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lexi Rabe

Lexi Rabe → Silk Road (2021 film) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

The target article has little to do with the subject of 'Lexi Rabe', other than her being a cast member. It does not contain any info about her, and is confusing for someone who searches for the subject. The redirect should therefore be deleted.IronManCap (talk) 00:03, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Met Him Last Night (Demi Lovato song)

Met Him Last Night (Demi Lovato song) → Dancing with the Devil... the Art of Starting Over (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

An article already exists for Met Him Last Night, and this redirect points to the album that it's on, instead of pointing to its own article. Even if it pointed to its own article, I would say it's unnecessary. I'd like to delete it to prevent further confusion.

Delete both "Met Him Last Night (song)" and "Met Him Last Night (Demi Lovato song)" both are redirected to Dancing with the Devil... the Art of Starting Over and were created by unregistered accounts/unverified editors when the original target Met Him Last Night was redirected before the topic became notable. Both redirects are unrequired. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 16:18, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

^ "MeSH Browser". meshb.nlm.nih.gov.

[1] "MeSH Browser". meshb.nlm.nih.gov.

[1]

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 -->
 <!-- Add new entries directly below this line. -->
-    ====UNC-R====
+====UNC-R====
 *<span id="UNC-R">{{no redirect|1 = UNC-R }}</span> → [[:North Carolina State University]] <span>&nbsp;<span class="plainlinks lx">([[Talk:UNC-R|talk]] <b>·</b> [[Special:WhatLinksHere/UNC-R|links]] <b>·</b> [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=UNC-R&action=history history] <b>·</b> [https://iw.toolforge.org/pageviews?start=2021-03-10&end=2021-04-08&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=UNC-R stats])</span></span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<small class="plainlinks"><nowiki>[</nowiki>&nbsp;Closure:&nbsp;''{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:UNC-R|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:[[{{FULLPAGENAME}}#UNC-R]] closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:UNC-R|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:[[{{FULLPAGENAME}}#UNC-R]] closed as retarget}}}} retarget]<span class="sysop-show">/[{{fullurl:UNC-R|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:[[{{FULLPAGENAME}}#UNC-R]] closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]</span>}}''&nbsp;]</small>&nbsp;