User talk:Gender Roamer: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:47, 23 April 2021

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Gender Roamer! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 21:19, Monday, March 15, 2021 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

The Wikipedia Adventure says to read Wikipedia talk:Neutral point of view. The page is so long! Gender Roamer (talk) 21:52, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not the talk page. It asked me to read Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. I've been reading it since my comment dated 21:52, 15 March 2021 (UTC). Gender Roamer (talk) 22:30, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So many pages! I have to read Wikipedia:Verifiability now. Gender Roamer (talk) 22:39, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will have to take some of this learning day by day. I won't need the Wikipedia Adventure to learn everything. Gender Roamer (talk) 22:39, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mail

Hi. I got your email, but I'm not ready to share my email with others. Sharing will happen if I reply through my email address. So I'll reply here: Yes, I will watch and edit those pages for sure! I'm sure I was going to head into that area eventually because the topics overlap. Gender Roamer (talk) 22:22, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting some article expansion help

Greetings,

I have been working / supporting on some of women's rights related articles and drafts, few of them are as below

Requesting you to visit any of above topics of interest to you and help expand the article which may interest you.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku (talk) 06:02, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Bookku. Between this and email, I don't know what I've done to inspire confidence among editors in my editing ability just yet, but I'll do my best to help when I can. For Draft:Sexual politics, I looked at sexual capital to see if there might be a big overlap and how a page about sexual politics could be developed. I feel most comfortable working on existing pages right now. So I can see what I can do for the reproductive justice page. Gender Roamer (talk) 22:52, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bookku, the reproductive justice page is big already. What kind of expansion would you want there? It looks like it just needs editing for word choice, cohesion, and flow, and some referencing. Maybe we should choose a draft to work on together? Gender Roamer (talk) 23:10, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @ Gender Roamer,

IMHO, Once we start search of more and more ref sources and discuss more nuanced difference between Sexual politics, Gender Politics and sexual capital will start becoming apparent.

Let me take first simpler examples Church or State does not share institutional power with women adequately is matter of Gender Politics but we can not directly connect issue of Gender power imbalance with sexuality;

Second simpler example of 'extramarital relation of Bill Clinton" when he was president of USA. Whether Clinton and his affair lady used sexual capital remains immaterial until Mrs. Clinton does not make any accusations, or Mr.Clinton's affair lady does not misuse relationship for some negative activity. Sans any negative proof Mr. Clinton and the lady affair may have engaged in whatever relationship what rest of America (Read USA) did with them is unnecessary Sexual politics. What people of USA did with them was not gender politics either.

That was too much of simplification but at many levels issue of Sexual politics comes, affects human and women's life greatly but some how is largely ignored and not yet covered properly in encyclopedia.

I am busy on some other topics will write on similarities and differences later when I get free. I will reply your other points after some break. :)

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku (talk) 11:35, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All right. Regards. Gender Roamer (talk) 23:45, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bitch (slang), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Slur. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Risker (talk) 00:21, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Risker. There's been a mistake. We are different people. We are a group who have been editing for a good cause. We were given background information and advice on how to edit. We were to take the Wikipedia editing adventure and edit in sessions. We were advised to not edit in the same topic areas for accusations of WP:MEAT. Should I send information to ArbCom? Gender Roamer (talk) 01:45, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 01:45, 23 April 2021 edit Gender Roamer (talk \| contribs) 296 edits →April 2021: different people. ← Previous edit		Revision as of 01:47, 23 April 2021 edit undo Gender Roamer (talk \| contribs) 296 edits m →April 2021 Next edit →
Line 73:		Line 73:

	{{checkuserblock-account\|appeal=arbcom\|sig=[[User:Risker\|Risker]] ([[User talk:Risker\|talk]]) 00:21, 23 April 2021 (UTC) }}		{{checkuserblock-account\|appeal=arbcom\|sig=[[User:Risker\|Risker]] ([[User talk:Risker\|talk]]) 00:21, 23 April 2021 (UTC) }}
	:Hi, [[User:Risker\|Risker]]. There's been a mistake. We are different people. We are a group who have been editing for a good cause. We were given background information and ~~advise~~ on how to edit. We were to take the Wikipedia editing adventure and edit in sessions. We were advised to not edit in the same topic areas for accusations of [[WP:MEAT]]. Should I send information to ArbCom? [[User:Gender Roamer\|Gender Roamer]] ([[User talk:Gender Roamer#top\|talk]]) 01:45, 23 April 2021 (UTC)		:Hi, [[User:Risker\|Risker]]. There's been a mistake. We are different people. We are a group who have been editing for a good cause. We were given background information and advice on how to edit. We were to take the Wikipedia editing adventure and edit in sessions. We were advised to not edit in the same topic areas for accusations of [[WP:MEAT]]. Should I send information to ArbCom? [[User:Gender Roamer\|Gender Roamer]] ([[User talk:Gender Roamer#top\|talk]]) 01:45, 23 April 2021 (UTC)