Talk:Mike Wozniak: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 19:57, 23 April 2021

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers Stub‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.
	This article needs a filmography section, as outlined by the guidelines of WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Comedy Stub‑class

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Removal of Prod on 2/14

I have removed the prod placed on this article. I disagree with the assertion that the article should be deleted. While the article does indeed fail WP:Entertainer, it meets WP:GNG and WP:Notability, which override WP:Entertainer, as WP:Entertainer is merely an additional point of entry for notability, not a replacement of the general notability guidelines. The individual has multiple, non-trivial, media mentions in reliable sources (listed below) that establish notability sufficient to merit inclusion in Wikipedia.

http://www.newsshopper.co.uk/leisure/4071335.Interview__Mike_Wozniak/ (interview with media outlet)
http://www.chortle.co.uk/comics/m/33410/mike_wozniak (trivial mention but lends weight)
http://www.edfringe.com/shows/detail.php?action=shows&id=1480 (trivial mention but lends weight)
http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/comedy/reviews/mike-wozniak-medina--negociants-edinburgh-festival-901745.html (a review by a major newspaper)
http://www.spoonfed.co.uk/artist/comedy-1524/mike-wozniak-17603/ (significant mention is less reliable media)

In light of the sources, I think the individual is marginally notable, sufficient for inclusion in Wikipedia. Since I can certainly see how one might disagree, feel free to nominate for deletion via AfD. I think the article needs work, not deletion. Jo7hs2 (talk) 01:43, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mike Wozniak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:45, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Spoiler/no source given

I don't understand why my edit was undone.

1. Having a spoiler to a series that hasn't even finished airing yet is surely a terrible addition to an article? 2. There's not even a source and I couldn't find any proof that he actually won series 11 of Taskmaster. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SilverEye91 (talk • contribs) 19:45, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 23 April 2021

It is requested that an edit be made to the semi-protected article at Mike Wozniak. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)

This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".

The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |answered=no parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input. This is so that inactive or completed requests don't needlessly fill up the edit requests category. You may also wish to use the {{ESp}} template in the response. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request.

‹ The template Edit semi-protected is being considered for merging. ›

Remove the information that Mike won Series 11 of Taskmaster, or at least put in a spoiler tag. Series 11 hasn't fully aired yet and there is no source, or any easily accessible information that he has won. Wikipedia articles for the contestants on Taskmaster are frequently visited when the audience doesn't know the people. To have a wikipedia article feature such a prominent spoiler to a show that it is not even possible to have legally seen yet makes for a very bad wikipedia article. When said spoiler doesn't even have a source it becomes even more questionable and is essentially a rumor.

I would also like to say to whoever keeps reverting the edits: Talk! Don't just do. Be a decent human being and discuss the matter. SilverEye91 (talk) 19:57, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 47: / Line 47: @@
 . Having a spoiler to a series that hasn't even finished airing yet is surely a terrible addition to an article?
 . There's not even a source and I couldn't find any proof that he actually won series 11 of Taskmaster.   <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:SilverEye91|SilverEye91]] ([[User talk:SilverEye91#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/SilverEye91|contribs]]) 19:45, 23 April 2021 (UTC)</span> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+== Semi-protected edit request on 23 April 2021 ==
+{{edit semi-protected|Mike Wozniak|answered=no}}
+Remove the information that Mike won Series 11 of Taskmaster, or at least put in a spoiler tag. Series 11 hasn't fully aired yet and there is no source, or any easily accessible information that he has won. Wikipedia articles for the contestants on Taskmaster are frequently visited when the audience doesn't know the people. To have a wikipedia article feature such a prominent spoiler to a show that it is not even possible to have legally seen yet makes for a very bad wikipedia article. When said spoiler doesn't even have a source it becomes even more questionable and is essentially a rumor.
+I would also like to say to whoever keeps reverting the edits: Talk! Don't just do. Be a decent human being and discuss the matter. [[User:SilverEye91|SilverEye91]] ([[User talk:SilverEye91|talk]]) 19:57, 23 April 2021 (UTC)