Jump to content

User talk:TopGun1066: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 29: Line 29:
Thanks for the advice. But I'll stick with the widely used convention followed throughout the Western military hemisphere of referring to SAMs and aircraft by their NATO reporting names. They mean something more to experts than a Russian-derived xyz123 number salad!
Thanks for the advice. But I'll stick with the widely used convention followed throughout the Western military hemisphere of referring to SAMs and aircraft by their NATO reporting names. They mean something more to experts than a Russian-derived xyz123 number salad!
Also, referring to Londonderry by the ethnic Gaelic name is insulting to the majority Loyalist community in NI and panders to Sinn Fein and the PIRA/INLA, so I'll stick with Londonderry thanks.[[User:TopGun1066|TopGun1066]] ([[User talk:TopGun1066#top|talk]]) 09:17, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Also, referring to Londonderry by the ethnic Gaelic name is insulting to the majority Loyalist community in NI and panders to Sinn Fein and the PIRA/INLA, so I'll stick with Londonderry thanks.[[User:TopGun1066|TopGun1066]] ([[User talk:TopGun1066#top|talk]]) 09:17, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

== Discretionary sanctions notification ==

{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.''

You have shown interest in [[the Troubles]]. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] is in effect. Any administrator may impose [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Sanctions|sanctions]] on editors who do not strictly follow [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies]], or the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Page restrictions|page-specific restrictions]], when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Guidance for editors|guidance on discretionary sanctions]] and the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee's]] decision [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/The Troubles|here]]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> [[User:FDW777|FDW777]] ([[User talk:FDW777|talk]]) 10:05, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Also the [[Thomas McMahon (Irish republican)‎]] article, as well as other Troubles related articles, is under a [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/The Troubles#Final remedies for AE case|1-revert-restriction]], meaning no more than 1 revert in a 24 hour period. For maximum transparency your edit was a revert. [[User:FDW777|FDW777]] ([[User talk:FDW777|talk]]) 10:06, 16 November 2020 (UTC)


== November 2020 ==
== November 2020 ==
Line 50: Line 39:


I knew editors on Wikipedia were left-wing and anti-establishment, but this is a step too far.
I knew editors on Wikipedia were left-wing and anti-establishment, but this is a step too far.

The sanctions etc don't bother me in the slightest, I expect nothing less from the far-left activists who run this site, and editors like FDW777 whose pro-IRA edits are unquestioningly accepted as gospel by the echo-chamber. It's sad.


== List of British Army installations ==
== List of British Army installations ==


Hi - Thanks for your edits to this article. Please can you read [[WP:V]], [[WP:CITE]] and [[WP:RS]]. I have added the missing citations to this article for you you on this occasion. Best wishes, [[User:Dormskirk|Dormskirk]] ([[User talk:Dormskirk|talk]]) 01:14, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi - Thanks for your edits to this article. Please can you read [[WP:V]], [[WP:CITE]] and [[WP:RS]]. I have added the missing citations to this article for you you on this occasion. Best wishes, [[User:Dormskirk|Dormskirk]] ([[User talk:Dormskirk|talk]]) 01:14, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

== Topic ban ==

==Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction==
{{Ivmbox
|2=Commons-emblem-hand.svg
|imagesize=50px
|1=The following sanction now applies to you:

{{Talkquote|1=You are indefinitely [[WP:tban|topic banned]] from [[The Troubles]], Irish Nationalism and British Nationalism in relation to Ireland, broadly construed.}}

You have been sanctioned in response to this report at WP:Arbitration Enforcement: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=prev&oldid=1021656703#TopGun1066]

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Involved admins|uninvolved administrator]] under the authority of the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]]'s decision at [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/The Troubles#Final decision]] and, if applicable, the procedure described at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions]]. This sanction has been recorded in the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions/Log/2021|log of sanctions]]. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the [[Wikipedia:Banning policy|banning policy]] to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Appeals and modifications|here]]. I recommend that you use the [[Template:Arbitration enforcement appeal#Usage|arbitration enforcement appeals template]] if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard.&nbsp;Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you.<!-- Template:AE sanction.-->&nbsp;<span style="font-family:times; text-shadow: 0 0 .2em #7af">~[[User:Awilley|Awilley]] <small>([[User talk:Awilley|talk]])</small></span> 22:58, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
:Please note that the restriction above prohibits you from making any edits related to The Troubles, Irish Nationalism, etc., anywhere on Wikipedia. Please take the time to follow the links in the template above so you don't mess up and get yourself blocked from editing altogether. <span style="font-family:times; text-shadow: 0 0 .2em #7af">~[[User:Awilley|Awilley]] <small>([[User talk:Awilley|talk]])</small></span> 23:00, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
}}

Revision as of 14:04, 6 May 2021

A belated welcome!

The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, TopGun1066! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! BilCat (talk) 09:44, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Wikipedia's standard now is to use the revealed Soviet/Russian actual designations

Since the early 1990s, much more material has become available on the Soviet Armed Forces. The actual Soviet designations of things like the SA-2 are now freely available, so the WP standard is to use S-75 rather than the DOD designation. Cheers Buckshot06 (talk) 04:05, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also, due to Northern Irish and other feelings, WP also has rule on how Londonderry is referred to in the encyclopedia - WP:DERRY, which you can take a look at should you wish. Like Queen's Regulations, the various WP:PILLARS and WP:DERRY etc are handy to know. Buckshot06 (talk) 04:08, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the advice. But I'll stick with the widely used convention followed throughout the Western military hemisphere of referring to SAMs and aircraft by their NATO reporting names. They mean something more to experts than a Russian-derived xyz123 number salad! Also, referring to Londonderry by the ethnic Gaelic name is insulting to the majority Loyalist community in NI and panders to Sinn Fein and the PIRA/INLA, so I'll stick with Londonderry thanks.TopGun1066 (talk) 09:17, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Information icon Hi TopGun1066! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. FDW777 (talk) 10:19, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

TopGun1066 (talk) 13:50, 16 November 2020 (UTC)You also wrote 10:08, 16 November 2020‎ FDW777 talk contribs‎ 6,560 bytes -111‎ rv. MOS:TERRORIST, in addition he was not convicted under any "terrorism" legislation since none existed in the Republic of Ireland at the time of his conviction.[reply]

These are weasel words. McMahon is a terrorist because he committed an act of terrorism, despite the legislation not being in place. Under your definition the Nazis didn't commit any war crimes because they did it before the Nuremberg Trials began.

I knew editors on Wikipedia were left-wing and anti-establishment, but this is a step too far.

The sanctions etc don't bother me in the slightest, I expect nothing less from the far-left activists who run this site, and editors like FDW777 whose pro-IRA edits are unquestioningly accepted as gospel by the echo-chamber. It's sad.

List of British Army installations

Hi - Thanks for your edits to this article. Please can you read WP:V, WP:CITE and WP:RS. I have added the missing citations to this article for you you on this occasion. Best wishes, Dormskirk (talk) 01:14, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]