Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gramps: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Creating deletion discussion page for Gramps. |
Keep Gramps, of course it is notable |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Gramps}}) |
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Gramps}}) |
||
Can see no evidence of [[WP:GNG|notability]] or any attempt to demonstrate notability for this genealogy software. Neither can I find anything online which would prove notability e.g. reliable secondary sources. The article seems pormotional, cited almost entirely to Gramps primary sources. Time for article to go. [[User:Sionk|Sionk]] ([[User talk:Sionk|talk]]) 20:50, 9 May 2021 (UTC) |
Can see no evidence of [[WP:GNG|notability]] or any attempt to demonstrate notability for this genealogy software. Neither can I find anything online which would prove notability e.g. reliable secondary sources. The article seems pormotional, cited almost entirely to Gramps primary sources. Time for article to go. [[User:Sionk|Sionk]] ([[User talk:Sionk|talk]]) 20:50, 9 May 2021 (UTC) |
||
* '''Keep''' Gramps is notable as a leading programme for genealogy. In my experience of genealogy software, it is the most advanced tool on any platform, and the only decent one on Linux. This article is not promotional, as Gramps is free and open source. It is not like commercial programmes which have articles on Wikipedia, such as [[Family Tree Maker]] and [[Legacy Family Tree]]. If the issue is secondary sources, then that should be remedied. --[[User:Pakaraki|Pakaraki]] ([[User talk:Pakaraki|talk]]) 00:30, 10 May 2021 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 00:30, 10 May 2021
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Gramps (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Can see no evidence of notability or any attempt to demonstrate notability for this genealogy software. Neither can I find anything online which would prove notability e.g. reliable secondary sources. The article seems pormotional, cited almost entirely to Gramps primary sources. Time for article to go. Sionk (talk) 20:50, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Gramps is notable as a leading programme for genealogy. In my experience of genealogy software, it is the most advanced tool on any platform, and the only decent one on Linux. This article is not promotional, as Gramps is free and open source. It is not like commercial programmes which have articles on Wikipedia, such as Family Tree Maker and Legacy Family Tree. If the issue is secondary sources, then that should be remedied. --Pakaraki (talk) 00:30, 10 May 2021 (UTC)