User talk:Sennagod

Layla Love

I cut more stuff and tagged the article with references needed, which in my opinion is a better choice than starting an AfD. David notMD (talk) 21:55, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

@David notMD, seconding David, tagging is a better option, you seem to be barely 12 hours old (or less?) if i may ask, why have you chosen to nominate or attempt to nominate the account for deletion? If you don’t mind me saying, Should we be worried about any off wiki backstory we have no knowledge about? Celestina007 (talk) 23:27, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

I agree if the artist is proven to be notable through properly sourced references the page could be filled out with facts instead of name checking and gross exaggerations. How is a commerce site a part of her biography? Sennagod (talk) 01:51, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

If you mean her own website, I agree that should be an external link rather than a ref. I removed the PROD, as I believe the article should be improved rather than deleted without debate. I suggest you start an AfD if in your opinion its existence is not warranted. David notMD (talk) 10:15, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Per PROD rules, if a PROD is contested, it cannot be restored. David notMD (talk) 03:57, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Sennagod, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Sennagod! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Sennagod. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 03:29, 16 July 2021 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Layla Love

Clearly, this article has become a focus of your attention. Rather than remove content piecemeal (I have reverted your latest edits), I beseech you to submit an AfD, so that experienced article reviewers can comment over a period of 1-2 weeks, and then a final decision made by an Administrator. Even if you believe content is in error or unreferenced, all that should remain as evidence to consider at the AfD. When creating the AfD, you have the opportunity to explain all of your reasons. AfD is not a rare process. Of the millions of existing articles, tens of thousands of them do not meet current standards, and are deletion-worthy. David notMD (talk) 11:35, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Either AfD the article or stop editing it. David notMD (talk) 10:01, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Consider yourself very lucky

If I hadn't just started a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents on an unrelated subject, I'd have reported your latest posts [1] there, calling for you to be blocked from editing. Instead, I've removed them, as a violation of WP:BLP policy, and a personal attack. Wikipedia is not a platform for the pursuit of personal grudges, and if you aren't prepared to take advice about how this place actually works, your presence here is likely to be a short one. I suggest you find something more useful to do elsewhere. AndyTheGrump (talk) 02:11, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

If an ANI is submitted, one possibility is that you would be blocked from editing this article and its Talk page; another is that you would be blocked from all editing for a limited or indefinite amount of time. David notMD (talk) 13:52, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Consider both your comments as wasted here and misdirected. I doubt you both came from no where and you are not here to put forth factual information. There’s no personal attack except by you both to me. I suggest you guys find a different place to put forth your personal opinions. Sennagod (talk) 03:48, 24 July 2021 (UTC)