User talk:Planetary Chaos

Thanks for visiting my talk page. If you post here, I will reply here so please be patient,I prommise to respond. If I have posted to your talk page, feel free to post your replies there...I'll watch.

Please click here to leave me a new message.

Thanks

I've been around for a while. There is still vandalism on the Giant Panda page and given its history it merits protection. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by ICECommander (talk • contribs) 18:44, 16 January 2007 (UTC).

Your sig

Can you "please" remove the image in your signature, as it is against WP:SIG. Thank you. Arjun 20:50, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Sure,didn't read that far into it at first,thanx.  Planetary Chaos  Talk to me  21:00, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

No problem. :) Arjun 21:13, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Necrotizing_fasciitis

Thank you for experimenting with the page Necrotizing_fasciitis on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. ...

Actually, it wasn't a test. It was an addition.

Why revert it? It was a useful discussion of the subject at hand. dougmc 22:55, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Rotten.com = spam link. No real notablity there.  Planetary Chaos  Talk to me  22:57, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Says you. I've found the page to be one of the best discussions of the topic available anywhere. I know, rotten.com is a strange place to find useful information, but there it is. dougmc 15:10, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

St Crispin's School

Sorry I thought you were a vandal. The page has been plagued with vandals tonight. However, roll is the correct spelling (in British English anyway!) in this particular sense meaning the number of children on the school register or roll. Role has a completely different meaning. Thanks for helping out with the earlier vandalism. I hope they've now got the message! Dahliarose 23:18, 16 January 2007 (UTC) No problem,I didn't read it as a whole...silly me..that will teach me to read!  Planetary Chaos  Talk to me  23:20, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

FactChkr

Thanks for the notice, but it's his talk page so I think it's acceptable for him to blank it if he wants. I don't have a problem with it since he didn't remove the tag from the image, that's probably the bigger deal. This way too we know that he actually saw the notice. But again, thanks for the notice. --MECU≈talk 18:18, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

• You are most welcome. --  Planetary Chaos  Talk to me  18:19, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

War_of_1812

To justify your deletion of what I have written, you need to do more than just call me names.

If you disagree with what has been written, or have concerns, then you should state your concerns so that we can have a civilized discussion.

I could simply replace what has been deleted, but let's instead discuss this. What points do you disagree with? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tingkai (talk • contribs) 18:44, 16 January 2007 (UTC).<!

Sweeping Changes as you did on War_of_1812 should be first discussed on the Talk:War_of_1812 pages first.  Planetary Chaos  Talk to me  18:47, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Again, the question is: what points of my addition do you object?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tingkai (talk • contribs)

The correct place to discuss these changes is the above mentioned talk page and please sign your post by typing four tildes . Thank you.  Planetary Chaos  Talk to me  19:03, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Works of Anthony Burgess

You're quite right to guard against vandalism on pages detailing specific works of Anthony Burgess.

However, the recent posts to Earthly Powers and The Kingdom of the Wicked are direct quotations from the authors' novels. The extracts may contain obscenities and may appear nonsensical, but so does much great literature (for example, Joyce's Finnegans Wake). The extracts were submitted in good faith.?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 145.246.240.14 (talk • contribs)

Vandalism: changing xB's to xiB's

I saw you issued several warnings to the user Sarenne, but s/he refuses to stop changing "MB," "GB," and "KB" on dozens of Wikipedia pages to "MiB," "GiB," and "KiB." No other sites reviewing computers, no manufacturer sites, and most importantly, no other encyclopedia sites, refer to MiB of RAM, or GiB of hard disk space; they all refer to MB of RAM and GB of hard drive space. These are the accepted units, the only units used, and the only units recognized by non-experts. Several of us have tried to ask him/her to stop, but s/he will not. Just thought I'd let you know. Thanks. Sjenkins7000 06:39, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

RE: User:SGA SARVER

Yes I know he has one. I would suggest to place {{sockpuppet|Sgs SARVER}} on the sockpuppet page since there is no sockpuppet report filed on him yet and it is to early to do so. Keep up the good work.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 22:55, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Ok, thank you.  Planetary Chaos  Talk to me  22:57, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

WP:AIAV

While I appreciate your vandal fighting...

When you state that you a user has vandalized past the final warning on WP:AIAV, first ensure the following:

1. The user has been warned with a "final warning" template
2. The user has vandalized past this final warning (check timestamps of warnings, and check user contributions pages)
3. The user has been appropriately warned. Don't add a final warning vandalism template just for a simple test.

If all of the conditions have been met, then list the user at WP:AIAV. Otherwise, it's just a hassle for administrators to remove improper request. Thanks. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 23:57, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Fair enough. A little extra time checking the facts and ensuring that the user has been appropriately warned and whatnot will go a long way in saving time for the admins, as well as being a little nicer to the newcomers. Cheers! If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 00:01, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

John Adams

Vandalism I was adding somthing that I believe and know have you ever read a 300+ page biography on Adams?

Please read WP:NPOV  Planetary Chaos  Talk to me  19:35, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Barbara Walters

What are you talking about? it's not unhelpful?? I'm trying to spruce up the page with a photo. She's BARBARA WALTERS for crying out loud. She needs a picture! And I fixed the info box so it didn't say her ethniticty was Jewish. That's a religion. And in the talk section someone mentioned that we should add something about how 3 people called her a liar, so I added it. I am NOT vandalising anything! Ilovebabawawa 18:08, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

• What you entered was lier lier pants on fire (barbra walters) and together nude (judge judy) is concidered vandalism Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you.  Planetary Chaos  Talk to me  18:13, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Removed trolling messages.  Planetary Chaos  Talk to me  18:43, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

In response to your revert on SpongeBob SquarePants

Well, it's mentioned in the article Squidward Tentacles in the lead. If you look at the histories of both articles, you can see that other editors have reverted similar changes. Squirepants101 23:25, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

See.. Squid_on_Strike  Planetary Chaos  Talk to me  23:47, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

OK, you may have a point, since Nick.com's description of Squidward says that he is a squid, but reliable sources, such as Time Magazine and MSN say that he's an octopus. Squirepants101 00:26, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

It's ok for Time and MSN to have their own POV.However it is their POV.As you have pointed out Nick says he's a squid (sponge bob's only network) and the episode that I pointed out says he's a squid. Now, who would you first believe, an out side news publication or the show it self?  Planetary Chaos  Talk to me  18:58, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Talk American Pie 6 Fraternity Row

Dude their is no proof that their is a 6th movie so i proposed deletion —The preceding unsigned comment was added by GunSlinger360 (talk • contribs) 21:24, 28 January 2007 (UTC).

• Your comment as seen here diff is not accepted on Wikipedia and is concidered vandalism Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you.  Planetary Chaos  Talk to me  21:37, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Tacna Region

Thank you for your recent contribution to the mentioned article. However, the center of this dispute is not about the Peru and Chile historical rivalry, but rather of POV. The last Peruvian-Chilean dispute was already solved when it became know in both countries, and it involves more of a local dispute (the constitutionality of a Chilean law creating a new region) rather than an international dispute. Messhermit 01:11, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

There is no such thing a border dispute between both countries because each one recognizes the established frontier as demarked in the Treaty of Lima. This Treaty is recognized by International Law. The War of the Pacific ended in 1884 and the Treaty of Lima was signed in 1929, 40 years later. Stating that the current dispute can be directly related to (as of 2007) an incident that happened more than 150 years ago. Such a broad argument can be used to include the dispute that both countries have regarding Ceviche, Pisco and Soccer, just to name a few. Should we also include those ones in the article about the war? Messhermit 01:11, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Now, the inclusion of this "supposed territorial dispute" as presented by the other party involved in this controversy is merely based on POV. Chile doesn't have to ask whether it can create a new province or not in its own territory, and neither Peru can unilaterally declare part of the new Chilean XV Region as part of its territory. The Constitutional Tribunal of Chile already addressed that the law defining the borders of the Chilean XV Region was unconstitutional on the grounds that it didn't follow the proper procedure, and at any moment ordered or asked the Chilean Government to define its frontier with Peru. Messhermit 01:11, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Issues like the mentioned above can happen at any moment and had indeed happened before. It just need a badly written law (in either Peru or Chile) to once again invoke nationalism. The same can happen in Bolivia, and in many other parts around the world. Messhermit 01:11, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

I will be waiting for your reply. Thanks Messhermit 01:11, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

I totally agree.  Planetary Chaos  Talk to me  01:14, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

who are you?

why are you reverting my things? stop doing that! god. --OCDpatient 20:41, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Adding sig

That was a little cheeky of me :-). But it was easily done and I didn't know if you'd ever visit the page again... WJBscribe 19:26, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

I am monitoring that page.It seems(Imay not be correct) but the IP is two other registered user that has vandalized that page today. again, thanks.  Planetary Chaos  Talk to me  19:32, 29 January 2007 (UTC)