User talk:ImperatorPanda

Welcome!

Hi ImperatorPanda! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Alex Bakharev (talk) 22:13, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Ivan VI

You have changed the image there saying that the previous image is actually of Petr Petrovich. The image is from Commons and is used in many projects. If it is indeed mis-attributed then something should be done there.

Why do you think the image is mis-attributed? The original source www.fine-art-images.net/de/showIMG_15300.html attributes the subject as Ivan Antonovich Alex Bakharev (talk) 22:23, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

I think that it is mis-attributed firstly because of this painting officially of Peter Petrovich

The image on the top is the image which I think is Peter Petrovich while the image below that is officially of Peter Petrovich. The panting bears a striking resemblance to the portrait thought to be of Ivan VI. Secondly, The article below says that the portrait reportedly being Ivan VI is actually of Peter Petrovich. https://www.dailyartmagazine.com/ivan-of-russia/

Thanks! It is very convincing! I will think about what to do on Commons Alex Bakharev (talk) 23:42, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Peter Petrovich (1715-1719) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Peter Petrovich (1715-1719), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 15:33, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter Petrovich (1715-1719) (May 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by -Zai- was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Peter Petrovich (1715-1719) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Peter Petrovich (1715-1719), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Zaitalk 22:37, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello, ImperatorPanda! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Zaitalk 22:37, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ejei Khan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Later Jin. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

This user is asking that their autoblock or shared IP address block be lifted:

ImperatorPanda (block log • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • user rights management • checkuser (log))

---

Block ID: #11424457 (BlockList • unblock)
Blocking admin: ‪C.Fred‬ (talk • blocks)
Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "New State (ATCE)". The reason given for New State (ATCE)'s block is: "Vandalism-only account".

WARNING: If you were blocked directly then you are using the wrong template and your block will not be reviewed since you have not provided a reason for unblocking. Please use {{unblock | reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} instead.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, or when you need checkuser assistance, please place {{subst:Unblock on hold-notification | 1=ImperatorPanda}} on the administrator's talk page. Then replace this template with the following:

{{unblock-auto on hold | 1=‪C.Fred‬ | 2=<nowiki>Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "New State (ATCE)". The reason given for New State (ATCE)'s block is: "Vandalism-only account".</nowiki> | 3=127.0.0.1 | 4=11424457 | 5=~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting decline reason here with any specific rationale. If the decline= parameter is omitted, a reason for unblocking will be requested.

{{unblock-auto reviewed | 1=127.0.0.1 | 2=<nowiki>Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "New State (ATCE)". The reason given for New State (ATCE)'s block is: "Vandalism-only account".</nowiki> | 3=‪C.Fred‬ | decline=decline reason here ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock-auto reviewed | 1=127.0.0.1 | 2=<nowiki>Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "New State (ATCE)". The reason given for New State (ATCE)'s block is: "Vandalism-only account".</nowiki> | 3=‪C.Fred‬ | accept=accept reason here ~~~~}}

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

ImperatorPanda (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

your reason here Likely a family member used my IP to get me blocked from editing

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=your reason here Likely a family member used my IP to get me blocked from editing |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=your reason here Likely a family member used my IP to get me blocked from editing |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=your reason here Likely a family member used my IP to get me blocked from editing |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}