Talk:The Pirate Bay: Difference between revisions
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:The Pirate Bay/Archive 10) (bot |
→Changing the profile picture: new section |
||
Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
The Lede says they were convicted in 2009, sentenced to a year, and released from prison early in 2015. I assume that there was an appeals process that took years, but the discrenpancy in the dates make it look like an error. It's a "stumbling block" for the Reader. No need for too much detail, but there could be a transistion word in there like "eventually", after "lengthly appeals" etc... and also more specfic than "shortened" unless they weren't uniform. The Lede is supposed to "invite" the Reader to read further into the body, but in this case I felt like I had to because the Lede might be in error.[[Special:Contributions/68.206.248.178|68.206.248.178]] ([[User talk:68.206.248.178|talk]]) 23:36, 21 August 2021 (UTC) |
The Lede says they were convicted in 2009, sentenced to a year, and released from prison early in 2015. I assume that there was an appeals process that took years, but the discrenpancy in the dates make it look like an error. It's a "stumbling block" for the Reader. No need for too much detail, but there could be a transistion word in there like "eventually", after "lengthly appeals" etc... and also more specfic than "shortened" unless they weren't uniform. The Lede is supposed to "invite" the Reader to read further into the body, but in this case I felt like I had to because the Lede might be in error.[[Special:Contributions/68.206.248.178|68.206.248.178]] ([[User talk:68.206.248.178|talk]]) 23:36, 21 August 2021 (UTC) |
||
== Changing the profile picture == |
|||
Hi everyone. I suggest changing the profile picture into the dark version of the logo because it suits a little bit better and if I'm not mistaken, it's the original logo. Could someone please do this? Thanks! |
Revision as of 14:28, 13 October 2021
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Pirate Bay article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
Wikipedia is not censored. Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image. |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about The Pirate Bay. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about The Pirate Bay at the Reference desk. |
Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute. |
The Pirate Bay was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
This article is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
To view an answer, click the [show] link to the right of the question. Q1: I found a link to a new version of The Pirate Bay website. Can it be included in the article?
A1: This will not be added unless an address has been confirmed by reliable sources as the new official site. The owners of The Pirate Bay have made no comment about their long term intentions, or endorsed any of the mirror sites. The mirror at thepiratebay.cr is not fully functional and does not allow user logins or new torrents to be uploaded. Concerns have also been expressed about mirror sites leading to scams and malware. Sources: [1][2][3][4] |
Added link about sci-hub
- Sci-Hub - network of pirated research papers, "Sci-Hub can instantly provide access to more than two-thirds of all scholarly articles", Lindsay McKenzie. Sci-Hub’s cache of pirated papers is so big, subscription journals are doomed, data analyst suggests. Science Magazine. Jul. 27, 2017. https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/07/sci-hub-s-cache-pirated-papers-so-big-subscription-journals-are-doomed-data-analyst
Onlyforwikiapps (talk) 22:22, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
What Happened between 2009 and 2015?
The Lede says they were convicted in 2009, sentenced to a year, and released from prison early in 2015. I assume that there was an appeals process that took years, but the discrenpancy in the dates make it look like an error. It's a "stumbling block" for the Reader. No need for too much detail, but there could be a transistion word in there like "eventually", after "lengthly appeals" etc... and also more specfic than "shortened" unless they weren't uniform. The Lede is supposed to "invite" the Reader to read further into the body, but in this case I felt like I had to because the Lede might be in error.68.206.248.178 (talk) 23:36, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
Changing the profile picture
Hi everyone. I suggest changing the profile picture into the dark version of the logo because it suits a little bit better and if I'm not mistaken, it's the original logo. Could someone please do this? Thanks!
- Wikipedia controversial topics
- Wikipedia objectionable content
- Delisted good articles
- Old requests for peer review
- B-Class Websites articles
- High-importance Websites articles
- B-Class Websites articles of High-importance
- B-Class Computing articles
- Mid-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- All Websites articles
- B-Class Internet culture articles
- High-importance Internet culture articles
- WikiProject Internet culture articles
- B-Class Sweden articles
- Mid-importance Sweden articles
- All WikiProject Sweden pages
- B-Class European Union articles
- Low-importance European Union articles
- WikiProject European Union articles
- B-Class law articles
- Mid-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- B-Class Brands articles
- High-importance Brands articles
- WikiProject Brands articles