Talk:GG45: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:53, 17 October 2021

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the GG45 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Electronics Start‑class Low‑importance

	Electronics portal This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Computing: Networking Start‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Networking task force (assessed as Low-importance).

It is requested that an image or photograph of GG45 connector and socket be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Extra conductors

I don't understand where the 4 extra conductors are coming from. Are they using the extra shielding from the 4 pair as conductors?

Also what does GG stand for (e.g. RJ=Registered Jack)?

I expanded the article a little and your question should be answered by now. 15:04, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

There is still no information on how the connector "knows" if it should be presenting the pairs in "compatibility" mode (on the 8 normal pins) or on the new 4 pins...... Plugwash 20:12, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image

There's an image uploaded to wikimedia that shows the GG45 connector. Should we include? [1]

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository Jump to: navigation, search —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.211.140.18 (talk) 23:53, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, because it was deleted. ツ indolering ^(talk) 20:03, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

802.3an

So now that the standard is released for 10GBASE-T, is this adapter still going to be used? --UNHchabo 07:37, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reorg

This article doesn't make much sense, as it refers to GG45 and ARJ45 as the same thing ... which it isn't. It's hard to explain GG45 without ARJ45, however, as it's just the semi-backwards compatible variant of the ARJ45 plug. But it probably doesn't deserve it's own article either, as it's a very obscure technology that never took off.

But I'm not sure where to put it. In order of what I think makes the most sense:

Move it to a subsection of IEC 11801, which is where the link for Category 7 cable is redirected. It was pretty much only designed for Cat 7 and Cat 8.2 (neither of which were widely adopted).
Move it to a subsection of Modular Connector, which is where 8P8C (AKA RJ45) redirects to. But I'm not sure if this counts as a modular connector or not.
Make a new article encompassing TERA, AJ45, and GG45 as I believe all three are exclusive to Cat 7/8.

ツ indolering ^(talk) 20:16, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 27: / Line 27: @@
 == Reorg ==
-This article doesn't make much sense, as it refers to GG45 and ARJ45 as the same thing ... which it isn't.  It's hard to explain GG45 without ARJ45, however, as it's just the semi-backwards compatible variant of the ARJ45 plug.  But it probably doesn't deserve it's own article either, as it's a very obscure technology that never took off.
+This article doesn't make much sense, as it refers to GG45 and ARJ45 as the same thing ... which it isn't.  It's hard to explain GG45 without ARJ45, however, as it's just the semi-backwards compatible variant of the ARJ45 plug.  But it probably doesn't deserve it's own article either, as it's a very obscure technology that [https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/opinions/category-7-and-7a-see-their-sunset/ never took off].
 But I'm not sure where to put it.  In order of what I think makes the most sense: