Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Halyna Hutchins: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Keep
Line 40: Line 40:
*'''Redirect''' to [[Rust (upcoming film)#Shooting incident]]. No independent notability for the individual, just the event. [[WP:BLP1E]] and [[WP:NOTMEMORIAL]] apply. Only deep coverage of her came after her death. – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 16:20, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
*'''Redirect''' to [[Rust (upcoming film)#Shooting incident]]. No independent notability for the individual, just the event. [[WP:BLP1E]] and [[WP:NOTMEMORIAL]] apply. Only deep coverage of her came after her death. – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 16:20, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
*'''Keep''': Body of work substantial enough to justify keeping, aside from today’s tragic eve. [[User:Yorkshiresky|yorkshiresky]] ([[User talk:Yorkshiresky|talk]]) 16:35, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
*'''Keep''': Body of work substantial enough to justify keeping, aside from today’s tragic eve. [[User:Yorkshiresky|yorkshiresky]] ([[User talk:Yorkshiresky|talk]]) 16:35, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' - From what others in the film industry have said about her, she was notable for her work where men typically have dominated the field. [https://www.cnn.com/2021/10/22/entertainment/halyna-hutchins-profile-scli-intl/index.html] [[User:Junglecat|<font color="green">JungleCat</font>]] <small>[[User talk:Junglecat|<font color="blue">Shiny!</font>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Junglecat|<font color="blue">Oohhh!</font>]]</small> 16:42, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:42, 22 October 2021

Halyna Hutchins (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP1E; WP:ONEEVENT . Article created on the day the news broke about her death. While I am sure the women in red gang would disagree, to my mind, from the body of her article it's not evident there are any achievements in her life for which she would have been notable for wikipedia had she not been killed by Baldwin. Daikido (talk) 10:45, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 11:48, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 11:48, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Please see WP:OTHERSTUFF. Wyliepedia @ 12:41, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • The onus is on the article creator to demonstrate it passes WP:GNG, not the other way round. They haven't done that, and doesn't look like she does. If in 1 month, 6 months or a year's time, she does for some reason, the article could be recreated at that point. But this is an article created in reaction to her death. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:58, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ribbet32, that might apply if the article was not created immediately and obviously in reaction to a particularly major incident, which by itself does not establish notability. Display name 99 (talk) 15:18, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That would just repeat the information from the Rust article. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 15:13, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Eastmain, Sandstein, Ref, Knockdomney, Hunter Kahn and Ribbet32. Halyna Hutchins is without a doubt sufficiently notable to be the subject of a Wikipedia article. She has 32 credits as a cinematographer as well as a number of other film credits and won the Jury Prize for Best Cinematography at the 2019 English Riviera Film Festival. —Roman Spinner (talkcontribs) 15:01, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    I absolutely agree. While she isn't super-notable, even without her death, she would still be borderline notable enough for an article. EytanMelech (talk) 15:17, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per editors before me. She has many notable credits. It's true that the article was mostly like created in response to her death, but as Ribbet32 points out "because articles must wait for someone who is interested in the subject to notice they are missing before they are created, a lot of articles do not exist that probably should." She should have already had an article before her death, but it took her death for an editor to realize that we didn't have one for her. JDDJS (talk to mesee what I've done) 15:22, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Move to "Death of Halyna Hutchins" as that is what was notable enough to cause this article creation. Warren Dew (talk) 15:25, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with this. Trillfendi (talk) 15:31, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Warren Dew and Trillfendi: As I said before, a "death of" article would simply repeat the same information as the Rust article. She is notable enough to have an article about her career. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 15:35, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I strongly disagree with this. She has several notable credits. Yes, her death is what brought attention to the fact that she was lacking an article, but it's not what makes her notable. JDDJS (talk to mesee what I've done) 15:37, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Besides, looking at the list of obituaries published by „The...Reporter“, are there any other insignificant persons, to be excluded?☆☆☆—PietadèTalk 16:29, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]