User talk:Abysshark

Hello, I'm HelenDegenerate. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Jeremy Wade have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. HelenDegenerate (talk) 20:12, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

April 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Loch Ness Monster have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Loch Ness Monster was changed by Abysshark (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951986 on 2021-04-15T09:46:35+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:46, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Purosinaloense. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, National Geographic Society, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Purosinaloense (talk) 10:05, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi Abysshark! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. —J. M. (talk) 17:40, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to YouTube. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you.—J. M. (talk) 17:40, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

May 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Tyrannosaurus, you may be blocked from editing. —J. M. (talk) 15:41, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

And again, please stop marking your edits as minor. Thank you.—J. M. (talk) 15:41, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Stop marking your edits as minor

Again, please stop marking your edits as minor. Your edits are not minor and marking major edits as minor is considered poor etiquette on Wikipedia. Thank you.—J. M. (talk) 19:11, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked for three months for persistent disruptive editing per all the warnings above. Your current edit warring to insist on your unsourced changes at Scorpio (astrology) is the last straw. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen | tålk 13:32, 27 October 2021 (UTC).