User talk:96.255.69.229: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:06, 25 November 2021

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Someone using this IP address, 96.255.69.229, has made edits that do not conform to our policies and therefore have been reverted. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you did not do this, you may wish to consider getting a username to avoid confusion with other editors. If you'd like to experiment with the syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

You don't have to log in to read or edit pages on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free, requires no personal information, and has many benefits. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you.

Some good links for newcomers are:

Help contents – the main help page.
Quick guide – a "cheatsheet" listing the main editing commands.
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask the Help Desk, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Again, welcome! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:40, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021 (WP:NOTHERE)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Jeppiz (talk) 16:11, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Please do not insert fringe or undue weight content into articles, as you did to John Fleck (footballer). An article should not give undue weight to any aspects of the subject but should strive to treat each aspect with a weight appropriate to its significance to the subject. Please use the article's talk page to discuss the material and its appropriate weight within the article. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 15:39, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:29, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for WP:NOTHERE. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. User:Ymblanter (talk) 17:14, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sources are not equal

Hello, I have noticed your block and since I did not see much text on your page I'll post this in case it can help for the future. An issue was that the sources you claimed were "brave" have a poor reputation in relation to fact checking (they do not meet WP:RS). The WP:RSP guide may be useful, but it's also possible to request the community to evaluate sources for specific material at WP:RSN. Heart disease is always a major cause of death (and heat stroke common in athletes), it's easy to erroneously link related deaths to any other recent event. This is why we cannot rely on amateur reports using raw data, it must go through the proper authorities and they must have a long enough history of data to be able to work. Wikipedia expects high quality sources for biomedical claims, WP:MEDRS. If a major health body issues an official statement, it would be much more interesting for Wikipedia than sensationalist tabloids. As Ymblanter said at ANI, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a similar tabloid (WP:NOT); it is not because some material is supported by any source that it deserves inclusion (WP:ONUS). —Paleo Neonate – 21:20, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Assuming that your sources did meet MEDRS (per the above) and that you were right that it deserves a mention, edit warring is still unacceptable and all editors should avoid it (WP:BRD is a good guide to the WP:CONSENSUS policy). —Paleo Neonate – 21:23, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Misinformation?

I notice that several admins have been reverting edits, including on article talk pages, about discussion on the rash of cardiac incidents among professional football players worldwide. Here's more information: [1]. To those admins, did you get the clot shot? Are you trying to avoid the realization that you've likely shortened your life by 10-20 years in order to slightly reduce the spread of a virus with a 99% survival rate? If you are, I expect my talk page access to be restricted immediately. 96.255.69.229 (talk) 23:00, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged: User:Muboshgu User:Ymblanter User:Orangemike User:SVTCobra User:Jeppiz

@@ Line 40: / Line 40: @@
 ==Misinformation?==
 I notice that several admins have been reverting edits, including on article talk pages, about discussion on the rash of cardiac incidents among professional football players worldwide.  Here's more information:  [https://brandnewtube.com/watch/daunting-compilation-of-athletes-collapsing-and-dying-from-the-covid-vax_9C8h9hZ7pEvCmz8.html].  To those admins, did you get the clot shot?  Are you trying to avoid the realization that you've likely shortened your life by 10-20 years in order to slightly reduce the spread of a virus with a 99% survival rate?  If you are, I expect my talk page access to be restricted immediately. [[Special:Contributions/96.255.69.229|96.255.69.229]] ([[User talk:96.255.69.229#top|talk]]) 23:00, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
+Tagged:  [[User:Muboshgu]] [[User:Ymblanter]] [[User:Orangemike]] [[User:SVTCobra]] [[User:Jeppiz]]