Jump to content

Talk:Patriot Front: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Protected "Talk:Patriot Front": Persistent sock puppetry ([Edit=Require autoconfirmed or confirmed access] (expires 05:42, 7 December 2021 (UTC)) [Move=Require autoconfirmed or confirmed access] (expires 05:42, 7 December 2021 (UTC)))
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
Line 66: Line 66:


--[[User:PulauKakatua19|PulauKakatua19]] ([[User talk:PulauKakatua19|talk]]) 11:39, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
--[[User:PulauKakatua19|PulauKakatua19]] ([[User talk:PulauKakatua19|talk]]) 11:39, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

== Public Figures Threshold ==

As this is considered to be the largest fascist and white supremacist group in the country by a pro-publica investigation, have any leadership figures other than the founder pierced the "public figure" threshold? A member's interest in concealing their face shouldn't impact a public interest in revealing biographical background on public figures.[[User:TuffStuffMcG|TuffStuffMcG]] ([[User talk:TuffStuffMcG|talk]]) 13:33, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:33, 6 December 2021

Dead links/twitter as source

Regarding this revert, do not remove a source merely because it is a dead link, per WP:LINKROT. Likewise, do not use self-published content, such as twitter or other social media as a reliable source, per WP:SPS. Summarize according to reliable sources, not first-hand knowledge or social gossip. Grayfell (talk) 02:55, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You guys forgot to add that they're cannibals eating unborn fetuses... Gosh the level of propaganda on Wikipedia is beyond levels previously thought impossible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.78.233.59 (talk) 08:08, 6 August 2020 (UTC) :KeK. --Anon805 (talk) 21:44, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

When you can find anything on this extant page -- or anywhere on Wikipedia -- that is in error, do please submit suggested corrections so that the mistakes or bias may be corrected. Thank you so much in advance for your prompt assistance, David. SoftwareThing (talk) 21:27, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ZOG claims?

So you're really just going to say that Patriot Front supports the ZOG 'conspiracy theory' on the basis of what? An ADL article without sources? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.43.151.33 (talk) 01:50, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a better source, reference, or citation to offer? SoftwareThing (talk) 21:24, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that would be the point. If you don't have a good source, reference, or citation to offer, then maybe don't include unsubstantiated information in the article. 65.40.206.2 (talk) 14:33, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ADL is itself a reliable source on this per WP:RSP. Llll5032 (talk) 01:37, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism in the Real World

Vandalism in the forest

The group's Nazi members also do vandalism in the real world. This Nazi vandalism was performed in the San Gabriel Mountains along a hiking trail. The vandalism was re-sealed with wood putty to seal the tree against fungus and beetle to save the tree. It might be informative to show this in the extant article to fully appreciate the scope of what these National Vanguard / Patriot Front . et al. do against the United States. SoftwareThing (talk) 21:19, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help me understand how the image shown is “Nazi vandalism” ? Bravosierra2010 (talk) 18:01, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected and false information (and minor edits)

Alright, so this page is semi-protected until July 11th, but I have noticed quite a few things that should be changed, and would also suggest additional information to be added. One minor thing to start off with: "Penske Corporation trucks" should be changed to "Penske Trucks" with the link on the word "Penske" not Penske Corporation. Second, there is only one source/reference, which said reference is unreliable at best. For example, I do not believe they shouted "the election was stolen" nor did they demand a recount of the 2020 election, that just isn't what Patriot Front does, they have never done it before, and they do not even support Donald Trump. Thus, all references to Donald Trump and the 2020 presidential election should be removed. As well, they did not use Smoke bombs and flares to cover their retreat, nor did they even leave town or were run out. As far as I have heard they were indeed chased, there were altercations with Patriot Front on the defensive, but the entire group was not chased out, they did continue their march. Only a few groups or stragglers were ever chased and harassed, the entire force was not removed from the town by locals. Suffice it to say, the march was "successful" for Patriot Front, they continued their march and reached their objective and then left, there were no significant actions done by either the front or the locals and "Antifa" groups. It was a simple, long, but simple flash demonstration with a few protestors, not some resounding anti-fascist victory, Patriot Front did not run away, it is a biased an inaccurate claim, the article should be edited to reflect that or bias removed all together.

Patriot Front will no doubt publish a promotional video regarding the event in a month, so said video will prove that they did indeed give their speech (they always give a speech at the end of their marches). The longer the distance of time passes after the march, the more of the truth and the actual facts will surface, but either way, these facts can not surface until the page is corrected, thanks.

Edit: Think about it, why would anyone go through the trouble of ordering 3 Penske Trucks, masking and organizing a group of 200 people, training them to march, and then using said para-military unit to contest the 2020 election of all things, something that IS ALREADY BEING DONE, by numerous other groups and individuals. Of all things, it just is not worth it, they could easily fall into the ranks of a dozen other protests. Or a Trump Rally, ignoring the fact as I have mentioned before, Patriot Front does not support Donald Trump. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Modern MarcAntony (talkcontribs) 01:40, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

1. Promotion of White Nationalism and Fascism in the United States

2. Uniting like-minded right wing individuals under one banner

3. Expansion of Patriot Front

This is THE most accurate definition for Patriot Front's goal/purpose ever seen on this page, in my humble opinion. Anyone who thinks they have a better definition (or thinks mine is too long, bulky, or your an editor who doesn't think it fits, can talk to me on this page. I believe this is really accurate, maybe too much, but feel free to share criticism or tell me if I should change it.

Keep in mind that any analysis in this article must be made by a reliable secondary source, not Wikipedia editors, per WP:OR Llll5032 (talk) 23:36, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalized mural in Portland

---Another Believer (Talk) 01:52, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

White Supremacists?

We need to provide links or evidence that these folks are white supremacists. Bravosierra2010 (talk) 14:13, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

More than the dozens of reliable sources currently in the article? That does not seem necessary. Kuru (talk) 15:31, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The manifesto (as a primary source) makes no racist assertions. The secondary sources do not cite any evidence of white supremacy from Patriot Front. Bravosierra2010 (talk) 17:47, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Many of the sources given explicitly provide this evidence, including break downs of the current and historical iterations of their "manifesto". I'm sorry, but I'm not going to be able to devote time to low-effort bait questions. Kuru (talk) 18:11, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not sure what low-effort bait questions are. This article would be more object and impartial if a link to the Patriot Front manifesto is included. Bravosierra2010 (talk)

Per WP:PSTS, "All analyses and interpretive or synthetic claims about primary sources must be referenced to a secondary or tertiary source, and must not be an original analysis of the primary-source material by Wikipedia editors." Llll5032 (talk) 01:06, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I prefer to label them as "White Nationalist" as opposed to "White Supremacist" although for me, both are very broad. But yes, according to their Manifesto they are not KKK-level white supremacists or anything of that degree.

Should we include rallies by Patriot Front among their activities?

Recently, PF held a rally at the Lincoln Memorial, which was condemned by locals. Can it be included among the other activities of the group, such as vandalism and fliers?

--PulauKakatua19 (talk) 11:39, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Public Figures Threshold

As this is considered to be the largest fascist and white supremacist group in the country by a pro-publica investigation, have any leadership figures other than the founder pierced the "public figure" threshold? A member's interest in concealing their face shouldn't impact a public interest in revealing biographical background on public figures.TuffStuffMcG (talk) 13:33, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]