Jump to content

Talk:San Francisco University High School: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Yobot (talk | contribs)
m Tagging, Removed: |needs-infobox=no, using Project:AWB
No edit summary
Line 20: Line 20:
== WikiProject class rating==
== WikiProject class rating==
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. [[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] 14:09, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. [[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] 14:09, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

{{Request Edit}}
<!--Don't remove anything above this line.-->


* '''What I think should be changed''': the logo and front door image
* '''Why it should be changed''': the logo used is outdated. It was updated in 2018 and the image used is NOT the main entrance
* '''References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button)''':

[[User:Jenn.Soult|Jenn.Soult]] ([[User talk:Jenn.Soult|talk]]) 22:59, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
<!--Don't remove anything below this line-->
{{reftalk}}

Revision as of 22:59, 4 January 2022


I wonder if the information about the scandal is totally accurate. If it's not, we should remove it until we know more . For example, I wasn't aware that all students had been expelled. Posting rumors on wikipedia contradicts the entire purpose of the site as a repository for verified knowledge. Even if it is true, not sure we'd want to publicize it, both because it is a personal disceplanary matter and because it's not really general information about the school. (Patrick Wendell)

Hey Pat, don't know if you remember me b/c I was a senior your frosh year. Disciplining 3 students for Wikipedia vandalism is not encyclopedic at this moment. If for some reason there is a controversy over it, then it might approach an encyclopedic level. Kevin Lee Attakmint 08:21, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. JYOuyang 04:19, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notable Alumn

the notable alumni section is really muddled, its probably wise to eliminate lesser known figures from the list

good call Edwin (!) Ncosmob

OK. So adding wikipedia links to all the notable alumns one can see which already have wikipedia articles. Unless anyone has objections here, I think the best way to clean up the alumns is to just eliminate all the people that do not already have wikipedia articles.Ncosmob 00:12, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So I went ahead and removed the notable alumn. with no wikipedia entries. I also removed the cleanup tag.Ncosmob 22:43, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 14:09, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


  • What I think should be changed: the logo and front door image
  • Why it should be changed: the logo used is outdated. It was updated in 2018 and the image used is NOT the main entrance
  • References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button):

Jenn.Soult (talk) 22:59, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References