User talk:Factsforsure44: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
:You were partially blocked as an IP, created a new account, and re-engaged in the same exact actions that led to a partial block, which only shows a lack of learning on what you did wrong and a refusal to improve. {{non-admin comment}} [[User:Casualdejekyll|<span style="color:#FF69B4">casualdejekyll</span>]] 17:19, 15 February 2022 (UTC) |
:You were partially blocked as an IP, created a new account, and re-engaged in the same exact actions that led to a partial block, which only shows a lack of learning on what you did wrong and a refusal to improve. {{non-admin comment}} [[User:Casualdejekyll|<span style="color:#FF69B4">casualdejekyll</span>]] 17:19, 15 February 2022 (UTC) |
||
:::I wrote a defense that got lost in cross edits. I did not create a username to evade the block. I created a username at the request of @willondon. I have read everything requested and this material was formatted exactly how the template on the talk page provided by one of the critical editors.[[User:Factsforsure44|Factsforsure44]] ([[User talk:Factsforsure44#top|talk]]) 17:26, 15 February 2022 (UTC) |
:::I wrote a defense that got lost in cross edits. I did not create a username to evade the block. I created a username at the request of @willondon. I have read everything requested and this material was formatted exactly how the template on the talk page provided by one of the critical editors.[[User:Factsforsure44|Factsforsure44]] ([[User talk:Factsforsure44#top|talk]]) 17:26, 15 February 2022 (UTC) |
||
:::What I did was create content to Wikipedia's standards. Please judge the content, not the person. And please escalate however possible. '''That content<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Katherine_Delmar_Burke_School&diff=1072038445&oldid=1072037739</ref> deserves to be seen and edited''' like anything else on the site[[User:Factsforsure44|Factsforsure44]] ([[User talk:Factsforsure44#top|talk]]) 17:27, 15 February 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:33, 15 February 2022
Katherine Delmar Burke School
You appear (very clearly) to be the IP that was just partial-blocked from the page Katherine Delmar Burke School for two weeks. Do not edit the page again until those two weeks expire. This is your only warning before I flag this account for block evasion(which will still likely happen even if I do not report it). SpinningCeres 23:24, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
Comment: for admin: block log of relevant IP range here. SpinningCeres 23:39, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Appointment_red.svg/48px-Appointment_red.svg.png)
Factsforsure44 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Your reason here This is ridiculous and is an attempt to censor.
Decline reason:
Please log out to appeal the block. 331dot (talk) 00:53, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- You'll have to appeal the block logged out on the IP range, since this account isn't technically under the sanction(but would be if reported as block evasion). SpinningCeres 23:41, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Looked into it and couldn't figure it out. This is a hard project to contribute to.
Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 14)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7e/AFC-Logo_Decline.svg/50px-AFC-Logo_Decline.svg.png)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Factsforsure44/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Factsforsure44/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
![]() |
Hello, Factsforsure44!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tol (talk | contribs) @ 20:34, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
|
Reference to school's own website
Please extremely limit the number of references to burke's own website, as it is self-published material and a primary source. School Wikipedia articles should rarely(if at all) reference the school's own website. SpinningCeres 17:03, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- If I trusted you were more than just content blocking it would mean more. I can't add to the talk page so left notes on your page as well as some of the editors you asked to help suppress this info recently.Factsforsure44 (talk) 17:06, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
February 2022
![Stop icon](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/4/42/Stop_x_nuvola.svg/40px-Stop_x_nuvola.svg.png)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Bbb23 (talk) 17:13, 15 February 2022 (UTC)![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Appointment_red.svg/48px-Appointment_red.svg.png)
Factsforsure44 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Please look at the mass reverts as a way to suppress info. This is beyond frustrating. My edits are constructive and well sourced as shown in my sandbox. I'd like a higher review if possibleFactsforsure44 (talk) 17:15, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Looks likely that what Casualdejekyll said is accurate. If that's not the case, please open a new unblock request and specifically note that. Yamla (talk) 17:24, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- You were partially blocked as an IP, created a new account, and re-engaged in the same exact actions that led to a partial block, which only shows a lack of learning on what you did wrong and a refusal to improve. (Non-administrator comment) casualdejekyll 17:19, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- I wrote a defense that got lost in cross edits. I did not create a username to evade the block. I created a username at the request of @willondon. I have read everything requested and this material was formatted exactly how the template on the talk page provided by one of the critical editors.Factsforsure44 (talk) 17:26, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- What I did was create content to Wikipedia's standards. Please judge the content, not the person. And please escalate however possible. That content[1] deserves to be seen and edited like anything else on the siteFactsforsure44 (talk) 17:27, 15 February 2022 (UTC)