Jump to content

User talk:Alpha Piscis Austrini: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 195: Line 195:


:I reverted it because there were references inside a redirect, which a redirect is not supposed to have. You are free to make a separate article about it however. [[User:Alpha Piscis Austrini|Alpha Piscis Austrini]] ([[User talk:Alpha Piscis Austrini#top|talk]]) 03:03, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
:I reverted it because there were references inside a redirect, which a redirect is not supposed to have. You are free to make a separate article about it however. [[User:Alpha Piscis Austrini|Alpha Piscis Austrini]] ([[User talk:Alpha Piscis Austrini#top|talk]]) 03:03, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
::Oh, so you'd accept a non-referenced redirect? (I couldn't find any policy statement one way or the other about refs for redirects, but it seemed like some sort of proof of it being correct was in order. I've no idea whether the trademark/brandname Scotchlok is worthy of a whole article of its own, but if the redirect is going to exist at all it may as well point to the right thing.) [[Special:Contributions/82.24.247.127|82.24.247.127]] ([[User talk:82.24.247.127|talk]]) 20:11, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:11, 5 May 2022

Welcome!

Hello, Alpha Piscis Austrini, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Valfontis (talk) 03:44, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thanks for your contributions. Dam222 🌋 (talk) 12:31, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dam222: No worries! I occasionally look for vandalism to revert whenever I can. Alpha Piscis Austrini (talk) 12:39, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Information icon Hello. Regarding the recent reverts you made, just wanted to inform you: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Using these can help further reduce vandalism. Thank you, and happy editing!! Kpddg (talk) 15:40, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Kpddg: Oh I didn't actually know about that! I was wondering how people were warning them like that. I'll have a look at that now. Alpha Piscis Austrini (talk) 15:43, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sure!! You can also have a look at Wikipedia:Twinkle. This is also pretty useful. Thank You. Kpddg (talk) 15:45, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Information icon Hello, I'm Hugo de Castro. Good afternoon, Brazil is the country with the most biodiversity in the world and this is reflected in the great variety of long-distance trails. We are at a very important moment in the implementation of long-distance trails and everything is done by volunteers. If you can help us with these publications we would be very grateful. Come and meet us here in Brazil. If you want to know a little more about the work being done: http://www.redetrilhas.org.br/w3/ Thank you so much!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hugodcp (talkcontribs) 18:03, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Hugodcp: Unfortunately that site is in Portuguese, so that will not be of any use to me. Alpha Piscis Austrini (talk) 11:21, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Alpha Piscis Austrini: I revised the text and I believe it was a good version. I would like to know if I can publish the text below?

In Brazil, Long-distance trails are regulated by two Federal Government Decrees. The trails are implemented and managed by Government agencies in partnership with the Brazilian Trails Network Association[1] (Rede Brasileira de Trilhas in portuguese) and its affiliated trails and partners. The Trails Network is the result of a maturing process of more than 20 years of implementation of trails, training trips, congresses, experts meetings and technical visits to more than 50 Long-distance trails in the world. The aim of the Trails Network is to create a national system made up of trails that are pleasant to hike, but that also generate employment and income in the surroundings and, above all, function as conservation tools, as they link protected areas with natural corridors.

Today, the Brazilian Trails Network has more than 120 trails in different stages of implementation in more than 300 municipalities in the 25 of the 27 Brazilian states. They connect all Brazilian biomes. As of January 2022, Brazil has more than 5,500 km of managed trails and another 20,500 km planned to be implemented in the coming years[2].

Long Distance Nature Trails in Brazil:

  • Transmantiqueira National Trail: 1200 kilometers[3]
  • Transcarioca Trail: 180 kilometers[4] [5] [6]
  • Atlantic Amazon Trail: 350 kilometers
  • Pioneers Route: 390 kilometers
  • Serra do Mar Trail: 300 kilometers
@Hugodcp: if you can find some other sources that also talk about these trails, and as long as that is put into your own words, then I believe that is okay to use. If you want you can ask other people for confirmation first, but I think what you have is okay at the moment. Alpha Piscis Austrini (talk) 07:30, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Alpha Piscis Austrini: Hi. Thanks for the orientation. I have included several references and sources to the text above. Can I publish this text as is? (talk)
@Hugodcp: Hmm I would also find a source for this as well: "As of January 2022, Brazil has more than 5,500 km of managed trails and another 20,500 km planned to be implemented in the coming years." After that, I think that would be good to add. Alpha Piscis Austrini (talk) 11:34, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Alpha Piscis Austrini: Hello, I already included the requested reference. Thank you very much!(talk) 09:37, 27 January 2022 (UTC-03:00)
@Hugodcp: No worries man. Happy to help. Alpha Piscis Austrini (talk) 11:07, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Alpha Piscis Austrini! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 16:25, Friday, January 21, 2022 (UTC)

Oh I didn't know this would post here but guess that's convenient. Alpha Piscis Austrini (talk) 16:31, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Great Work

Hi @Alpha Piscis Austrini, You are doing great in countering vandalism. You should have a look at RedWarn, A great user-friendly counter-vandalism tool which look more cool with new Vector (2022) skin. And Assume good faith. Zsohl (Talk) 14:12, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I will check it out. Alpha Piscis Austrini (talk) 14:45, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Content removal of Microsoft Teams

Why did you warning me on my talk page for no reason just about the Microsoft Teams article and then you said "I noticed that you recently removed content from Microsoft Teams without adequately explaining why." Naturally the Microsoft Teams is an online meeting so I said the reason for the change is Webinar. Is that enough or not? 112.200.32.24 (talk) 14:52, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That is not an adequate reason. Microsoft Teams is notable enough to have its own article. Redirecting it to digital marketing, without discussion, is not a good enough reason to do that. Alpha Piscis Austrini (talk) 14:53, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted my new content

Hi, I want some help on the content which is deleted. Please help me on this.C.krishnamv (talk) 14:43, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In your edit, first of all, none of what you said was sourced, which was grounds for removal anyway. But second of all, phrases like "For the past 21 years Maveric has hired a number of employees from all over India and taken care of each and everyone in the best possible way." and "Maveric Systems offers a broad spectrum of job opportunities under a professional & pleasant working environment." sounds like promotion and non-neutral point of view. WP:NPOV might help with this. Alpha Piscis Austrini (talk) 14:56, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A little something

The Purple Star The Purple Star
It isn't much and definitely not all you deserve but this barn star is for remaining civil while being unjustly attacked and showing the resilience to remain steadfast in protecting the encyclopedia while honoring good faith principals. Others notice and appreciate your contributions. ARoseWolf 19:23, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@ARoseWolf: Yo thanks so much for the star! I really appreciate it! Alpha Piscis Austrini (talk) 17:43, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

???

Why did you remove Education and tribe information from kingargali Sajjad Ahmad (baryal) (talk) 14:00, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not all of that information needed to be there. Stating that there are two tribes is enough. As for the education one, you can add that back if you want. Alpha Piscis Austrini (talk) 14:04, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

please do not add unrelated info

Imperial laws of beheading did not apply to the Vietnamese it is not even supported by the source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vietnguen (talkcontribs) 13:03, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"lol"

I noticed that you replied "lol" to an edit filter false positive report where the user was blocked. Please refrain from doing so in the future as it's not only rude but inappropriate to do so. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 13:34, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I just found the whole situation funny. Alpha Piscis Austrini (talk) 13:35, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I understand that, however remember that Wikipedia is not a social network, and comments like that are often seen as unconstructive. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 13:38, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Got it. Alpha Piscis Austrini (talk) 13:39, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Glad you understand. I noticed while looking at your talk page that you mainly do anti-vandalism work. Something you should remember while doing so is Don't feed the trolls. They just want attention and if you give them that, it encourages them to continue their bad behavior. Ignore the bad behavior (just giving them a warning will still be ignoring the bad behavior) and praise the good behavior. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 13:42, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I always keep that in mind. Engaging with trolls is a waste of time anyway. Alpha Piscis Austrini (talk) 13:50, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Good. Also, seeing your contributions, I can see why you decided to reply "lol" to the EFFPR (Edit filter false positive report) since you had warned the user previously. Based on their description of their report, they might be the subject of the article, in which case they would have a WP:COI. Probably wouldn't have mattered if you told them anyway since I've noticed that IPs tend to ignore the warnings on their talk page. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 13:55, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ehhhh I didn't really see the point, seeing that they probably would have gotten blocked regardless of what I did. Alpha Piscis Austrini (talk) 13:56, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Makes sense. Anyways, I'm glad you're understanding what I'm saying. Hope I see you again in the future. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 13:59, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Likewise. I see you around quite a bit actually. Alpha Piscis Austrini (talk) 14:00, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ah nice. I don't think I've seen you before now so you probably just happen to see some edits I make but never actually have anything to do with me. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 14:02, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nah I see you in other places too. Alpha Piscis Austrini (talk) 14:03, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Anyway I'm going to heed your advice now and stop commenting here now since, like you said, Wikipedia is not a social network. I don't know if this also applies to user talk pages, but regardless, not gonna take that risk. Alpha Piscis Austrini (talk) 14:05, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Message.

Thank you for understandings♥️.. I'll try to rectify my mistakes.. Thanks for your guidance... And sorry for previous words which might hurts you... I never use such type of words verbally by mouth and text.. I get angry by your edits.. Anyways. Sorry and Thank you.. Kingshravan04 (talk) 14:59, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your words didn't hurt me. They were extremely out of line though. But I'm glad you've understood why you were blocked. And thanks for the apology. I accept it. Take care. Alpha Piscis Austrini (talk) 15:29, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting my page

Can you please not delete everything I wrote on the page? I worked very hard on it. It's just a redirect page anyways and no one will ever go there. 2001:14BB:C0:1004:91FF:30C6:9763:52A2 (talk) 16:53, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That does not matter. You cannot put stuff like that there. Alpha Piscis Austrini (talk) 16:55, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why not? It's the free encyclopedia. It doesn't affect anyone negatively. Actually, it does quite the opposite. It's humorous and hopefully will brighten someone's day. And again, it was simply a redirect page, with zero text whatsoever, so let me have my freedom and make someone smile. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:14BB:C0:1004:91FF:30C6:9763:52A2 (talk) 16:58, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's not how that works. At all. Redirect pages exist for a reason. They have a purpose. You can't just do whatever you want with it and expect no one to do anything just because it has "zero text whatsoever." Alpha Piscis Austrini (talk) 10:37, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Cheers for deleting my edit on Mar Baselios College of Engineering and Technology. I tried to undo a piece of vandalism, and turns out someone already had so I accidentally undid their undo! Sorry about that. -- ☽☆ NotCharizard (talk) 13:00, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Happens to the best of us. Alpha Piscis Austrini (talk) 13:01, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not true lucas marques da Silva

you put wrong information about lucas marques da silva who plays for young elephant fc in laos. The information I had posted before is from the real Lucas who plays for Young Elephants FC. please update and re-enter the information I had pasted. Lucasspaulista (talk) 16:29, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I mainly reverted because of the formatting, not because of the information itself. The information was not presented properly enough. You can add it back, but with proper formatting. Then it can stay. If only minor changes need to be made, then someone else, or even myself, can polish it up afterwards. Alpha Piscis Austrini (talk) 16:36, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Earth Day 2022 Edit-a-thon - April 22nd - 2PM EST

You're invited! NYC Earth Day 2022 Edit-a-thon! April 22nd!

Sure We Can and the Environment of New York City Task Force invite you to join us for:

This Edit-a-Thon is part of a larger Earth Day celebration, hosted by Brooklyn based recycling and community center Sure We Can, that runs from 1PM-7PM and is open to the public! See this flyer for more information: https://www.instagram.com/p/CcGr4FyuqEa/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link

-- Environment of New York City Task Force

Cosmetic edit

Your edit here was cosmetic, so shouldn't be made, especially not using semi-automated editing tools like AWB. Happy editing! Qwerfjkltalk 20:36, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reminding me. Should have reviewed the changes more carefully before submitting. Alpha Piscis Austrini (talk) 06:38, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think under "skip", you can check "Skip if cosmetic edit". Qwerfjkltalk 08:40, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Got it. Alpha Piscis Austrini (talk) 12:42, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tool not so great

Hi Alpha Piscis Austrini, I noticed this edit that you made to Rat torture using AWB. A simple glance at the previous IP edits would have shown that they were only the nonsensical work of a vandal, which not only added gibberish to the text, but even removed references and categories. Even after being here for 5 years I still don't use automated tools at all and am not sure how they work; still, it is obvious in this case that the tool could not see the forest for the trees. All that was really needed was a simple reverting of vandalism, which I already did manually. We were all new here once and have made mistakes, so I just wanted to let you know what happened. Cheers and happy continued vandal-fighting. Best, StonyBrook (talk) 00:11, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Azrael, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian Lange. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey!

Looks like you added some tags to my Number 22 Hillside LLC/Corp article, I fixed it, and added a link to the article from others related to it. NJTFan22 (talk) 18:44, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sweet! Thanks for that. Alpha Piscis Austrini (talk) 00:36, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Scotchlok redirect

Apparently you reverted Scotchlok. Did you actually look at the provided ref? Scotchlok is absolutely *not* a type of twist-on wire connector, it's an IDC connector, a completely different type of splice. 82.24.247.127 (talk) 00:11, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted it because there were references inside a redirect, which a redirect is not supposed to have. You are free to make a separate article about it however. Alpha Piscis Austrini (talk) 03:03, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, so you'd accept a non-referenced redirect? (I couldn't find any policy statement one way or the other about refs for redirects, but it seemed like some sort of proof of it being correct was in order. I've no idea whether the trademark/brandname Scotchlok is worthy of a whole article of its own, but if the redirect is going to exist at all it may as well point to the right thing.) 82.24.247.127 (talk) 20:11, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. ^ Article from the Brazilian Trail Network on the World Trails Network website. Retrieved 25 January 2022. https://worldtrailsnetwork.org/portfolio-item/brasilian-trails-network/
  2. ^ Brazilian Trails Network Association website. Retrieved 27 January 2022. http://www.redetrilhas.org.br
  3. ^ Article from the Transmantiqueira Trail on the World Trails Network website. Retrieved 25 January 2022. https://worldtrailsnetwork.org/portfolio-item/trilha-transmantiqueira-brasil/
  4. ^ Article from the Transcarioca Trail on the World Trails Network website. Retrieved 25 January 2022. https://worldtrailsnetwork.org/portfolio-item/brasilian-trails-network/
  5. ^ Article from the Transcarioca Trail on the Lonely Planet Magazine website. Retrieved 25 January 2022. https://www.lonelyplanet.com/articles/trekking-rio-on-the-transcarioca-trail
  6. ^ Trilha Transcarioca website. Retrieved 25 January 2022. https://trilhatranscarioca.com.br/