Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase: Difference between revisions
Cyberbot I (talk | contribs) Bot clerking, archiving 3 threads, 13 pending requests remain. |
PaienPaien (talk | contribs) Requesting protection for Galvão Bueno |
||
| Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
* {{pagelinks|Panabo}} |
* {{pagelinks|Panabo}} |
||
'''Reason:''' Persistent and high level of IP vandalism. '''[[User:P199|<span style="color: #199199;">P 1 9 9</span>]]''' <big>[[User talk:P199|✉]]</big> 14:57, 25 May 2022 (UTC) |
'''Reason:''' Persistent and high level of IP vandalism. '''[[User:P199|<span style="color: #199199;">P 1 9 9</span>]]''' <big>[[User talk:P199|✉]]</big> 14:57, 25 May 2022 (UTC) |
||
=== [[Galvão Bueno]] === |
|||
* {{pagelinks|Galvão Bueno}} |
|||
'''Reason:''' Extreme repeated vandalism [[User:PaienPaien|PaienPaien]] ([[User talk:PaienPaien|talk]]) 15:07, 25 May 2022 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 15:07, 25 May 2022
| Requests for page protection | |
|---|---|
|
You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level". Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
| |
Reason: Repeated additon of unsourced content on page by auto confirmed users User:Pointn and User:Chronikhiles from last few days. Major biased changes under the name of minor changes are being done without providing WP:RS or any edit summary. It all result in compromising the readability and neutrality of page. Kindly, increase the protection from auto confirmed to extended confirmed users. Thanks. Kridha (talk) 06:15, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism - ranges confirm globally blocked user:FFA P-16 Anidaat (talk) 09:02, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
- Anidaat, that would be an WP:SPI matter.
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. El_C 11:41, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Until the season is over. I don't think at this stage IPs or overzealous fans are going to adhere to MOS:ACCESS or allow some stability in the article. There's been some terrible instability around deleting of tables, reformatting and organising information that is not compliant with MOS:TABLE and WP:COLOR. There were heated discussions at multiple admin interventions here and here around previous/other series of Drag Race. Safest bet is to ask editors to post updates on the talkpage instead. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 09:31, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism and unsourced content Melihthewikilover (talk) 11:33, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. interstatefive (talk) - just another roadgeek 22:57, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
Reason: Addition of poorly, unreferenced material by certain caste pov IPs to create a false impression of relating 19th century group with a mythological group. I request for some protection on this page RS6784 (talk) 05:28, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
- There has been constant addition of poorly referenced materials which have been removed in the past just to connect a mythological group with a present day Yadav, Ahir community. The details on the page are exactly opposite to points put up by these IPs. The same IPs constantly attack editors on talk page of article with very choices of abuses. I suspect a lot of them are banned sock accounts. In line with all this I request for protection on this page. RS6784 (talk) 07:22, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
- @RS6784: Help is on the way. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:30, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:38, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Note: Not sure that describing the person with whom you are in a content dispute in unfavorable terms adds anything to a request. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:38, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Reason: Regular disruptive activity by IPs and newly socks overriding the previous consensus on it by senior editor. RS6784 (talk) 08:38, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry Admin, for my wrongly framing of words here. My point is as the page had some consensus based decision in the past by editors and now newly SPAs are active on it with very disruptive editing. You can see the 1-2 weeks activity on that page, I think considering all this there should be some protection. Apologies once again for wrong choice of words. RS6784 (talk) 10:24, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
- Note: We have no senior editors. Wikipedia is the encyclopedia anyone can edit. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:17, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:22, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
- Note: User is DS alerted and has been warned twice for disruption. If they persist, they will be subject to escalating blocks. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:22, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Reason: People Making So much Wrong information without any Reference Thenfsa (talk) 10:34, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Reason: Possible unsourced content edits Melihthewikilover (talk) 11:54, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 12:22, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Reason: False information, vandalism and unsourced content Melihthewikilover (talk) 12:28, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:32, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Unsourced changes/edit warring by IPs/new users over the subject's ethnicity and birthplace since the past protection expired. Ab207 (talk) 14:33, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent and high level of IP vandalism P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:56, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent and high level of IP vandalism. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:57, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Reason: Extreme repeated vandalism PaienPaien (talk) 15:07, 25 May 2022 (UTC)