Jump to content

Talk:Bitcoin Cash: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 50: Line 50:


:Hi, we are only using high quality [[WP:RS]] for all cryptocurrency articles. Things like bloomberg, wsj, fortune.com, etc. We cannot use any contributor sources as well. Thanks! [[User:Jtbobwaysf|Jtbobwaysf]] ([[User talk:Jtbobwaysf|talk]]) 21:21, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
:Hi, we are only using high quality [[WP:RS]] for all cryptocurrency articles. Things like bloomberg, wsj, fortune.com, etc. We cannot use any contributor sources as well. Thanks! [[User:Jtbobwaysf|Jtbobwaysf]] ([[User talk:Jtbobwaysf|talk]]) 21:21, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

:The current development section contains a single citation to a specific bitcoin unlimited release on gitlab. Should that be completely removed, then? [[Special:Contributions/47.55.189.239|47.55.189.239]] ([[User talk:47.55.189.239|talk]]) 21:34, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:34, 13 June 2022

BSV Turing complete

How come there is no mention of the fact that BSV is Turing complete and allows equivalents of Smart Contracts? This is a huge feat considering that the original limitation of BTC that lead to the development of Ethereum and a myriad of other altcoins was the inability to e execute code on chain. With this solved on the BSV blockchain, how can we neglect to mention it? 109.232.69.73 (talk) 16:47, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead and add it! WP:BEBOLD Mathmo Talk 05:15, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You need a WP:RS source for this. Coindesk, blogs, etc dont work here. Must be something like fortune.com, wsj, etc. I doubt there is coverage of BSV in these mediums, but if there is, then great. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 07:09, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Coingeek has covered this more than once as a reference. And Coindesk can't be used to establish notability for an article's existence, but can be used as references within the article itself. Mathmo Talk 12:48, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 10 January 2022 (add notelist)

The article needs a Notes section and {{notelist}} added in order to fix the cite/note error. - Galactic-Radiance (Talk) 19:16, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Done PianoDan (talk) 22:22, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Update Development Section

COI disclaimer: I currently produce The Bitcoin Cash Podcast. There is no "official" bitcoin cash podcast & we are simply users with interest in the coin, but I figured I just be absolutely clear. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.55.189.239 (talk) 21:04, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed only Bitcoin Unlimited is listed under the implementation(s) section. The current node implementations are as follows: BCHN, BCHD, BU, Bitcoin Verde, & Knuth. [1] Those implementations also have much more recent releases than what is listed, including BU. BCHN is on V24.1.0, updated on May 29th, 2022 [2] BCHD is on v0.19.0, updated on May 05, 2022 [3] BU is on 1.10.0.0, updated on April 5th, 2022 [4] Bitcoin Verde is on v2.2.0, updated on Jan 05, 2022 [5] and lastly, Knuth is on v0.24.0, updated May 5th 2022 [6]

Hi, we are only using high quality WP:RS for all cryptocurrency articles. Things like bloomberg, wsj, fortune.com, etc. We cannot use any contributor sources as well. Thanks! Jtbobwaysf (talk) 21:21, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The current development section contains a single citation to a specific bitcoin unlimited release on gitlab. Should that be completely removed, then? 47.55.189.239 (talk) 21:34, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. ^ "nodes". bitcoincash.org. Retrieved 13 June 2022.
  2. ^ "bchn releases". gitlab. Retrieved 13 June 2022.
  3. ^ "bchd releases". github. Retrieved 13 June 2022.
  4. ^ "BU releases". gitlab. Retrieved 13 June 2022.
  5. ^ "Bitcoin Verde Releases". github. Retrieved 13 June 2022.
  6. ^ "Knuth releases". github. Retrieved 13 June 2022.