User talk:103.225.23.94: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Kleinpecan (talk | contribs) Warning: Not adhering to neutral point of view. |
You have been blocked from editing for disruptive editing. |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
[[File:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px|alt=Warning icon]] Please stop your [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive editing]]. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view policy]] by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]. <!-- Template:uw-npov3 --> [[User:Kleinpecan|Kleinpecan]] ([[User talk:Kleinpecan|talk]]) 04:59, 20 July 2022 (UTC) |
[[File:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px|alt=Warning icon]] Please stop your [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive editing]]. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view policy]] by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]. <!-- Template:uw-npov3 --> [[User:Kleinpecan|Kleinpecan]] ([[User talk:Kleinpecan|talk]]) 04:59, 20 July 2022 (UTC) |
||
<div class="user-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px">[[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]]<div style="margin-left:45px">Anonymous users from this IP address have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''31 hours''' for persistently making [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive edits]]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. --><code><nowiki>{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code>. [[User:Alex Bakharev|Alex Bakharev]] ([[User talk:Alex Bakharev|talk]]) 05:32, 20 July 2022 (UTC)</div></div> |
|||
: ''If this is a [[Network address translation|shared IP address]] and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by [[Special:Userlogin|logging in]]''.<!-- Template:uw-disruptblock --> |
|||
Revision as of 05:32, 20 July 2022
July 2022
Hello, I'm LichF. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Lysychansk have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. LichF (talk) 08:56, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
- how is that not constructive? the city is part of LPR, was under Ukrainian occupation from 2014 and now is liberated by LPR fighters backed by Russia. 103.225.23.94 (talk) 08:57, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
- It is accurate to say it is "occupied" by Russia since it is widely considered to be Ukrainian territory, but it is currently controlled by the Russian military and Russian-backed forces. Saying it was "liberated" is not neutral ("captured" is significantly more neutral), and Wikipedia should be written from a neutral point of view. LichF (talk) 09:04, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
- then keep the word controlled as many of LPR fighters are actually locals and now re-united with their families. ukraine army has no business being there. 103.225.23.94 (talk) 09:05, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
- Please discuss this on Talk:Lysychansk (the most recent post (bottom) is about this very dispute). LichF (talk) 09:27, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
- then keep the word controlled as many of LPR fighters are actually locals and now re-united with their families. ukraine army has no business being there. 103.225.23.94 (talk) 09:05, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
- It is accurate to say it is "occupied" by Russia since it is widely considered to be Ukrainian territory, but it is currently controlled by the Russian military and Russian-backed forces. Saying it was "liberated" is not neutral ("captured" is significantly more neutral), and Wikipedia should be written from a neutral point of view. LichF (talk) 09:04, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lysychansk. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. LichF (talk) 08:58, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Kleinpecan (talk) 04:59, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alex Bakharev (talk) 05:32, 20 July 2022 (UTC)- If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.