Jump to content

Talk:Same-sex marriage in Andorra: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Touyats (talk | contribs)
Touyats (talk | contribs)
Line 37: Line 37:
:::[[User:Leobadboy|Leobadboy]] ([[User talk:Leobadboy|talk]]) [[User:Leobadboy|Leobadboy]] ([[User talk:Leobadboy|talk]]) 09:58, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
:::[[User:Leobadboy|Leobadboy]] ([[User talk:Leobadboy|talk]]) [[User:Leobadboy|Leobadboy]] ([[User talk:Leobadboy|talk]]) 09:58, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
::::Amazing answer, Leobadboy. I would suggest it's a good idea to integrate it in the article's text, at least provisionally, given that it is fully sourced. [[User:Touyats|Touyats]] ([[User talk:Touyats|talk]]) 12:02, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
::::Amazing answer, Leobadboy. I would suggest it's a good idea to integrate it in the article's text, at least provisionally, given that it is fully sourced. [[User:Touyats|Touyats]] ([[User talk:Touyats|talk]]) 12:02, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
::::@[[User:Leobadboy|Leobadboy]] I took the liberty to integrate sources you found to better explain the Social Democrats' amendment. [[User:Touyats|Touyats]] ([[User talk:Touyats|talk]]) 09:44, 27 July 2022 (UTC)


== Requested move 21 July 2022 ==
== Requested move 21 July 2022 ==

Revision as of 09:44, 27 July 2022

Untitled

Is this a machine translation? (Alphaboi867 1 July 2005 05:10 (UTC))

I've come here from the copyediting help page, and tried to make sense of it. My source on the government structure was the CIA Factbook, available on line. However, I've kept it as a stub, because there's still a great deal of information that can be added in - for example, whether local groups or those in other parts of Europe promoted the civil union laws; what Andorra's previous attitude towards same sex couples has been, etc. Noirdame 7 July 2005 20:52 (UTC)

Self-contradiction

This article appears to say that only one of the co-princes signed that new law and that both did. Which is the case? Caveat lector 00:01, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The current edit seems to be talking about two different laws now. Contradiction is resolved, though the article really needs work to help explain this clearly. Yoshi348 (talk) 17:57, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Real marriage or civil unions?

The text says that the "civil" marriage (civil casament) will have a different name than the "religious" marriage (matriomoni canonic). Does this mean that they are going to be two different legal in instruments? Touyats (talk) 17:39, 6 February 2022 (UTC) It is a real marriage. The law passed by parliament on 21 July 2022. It comes into effect in January 2023. https://www.consellgeneral.ad/ca/activitat-parlamentaria/iniciatives-legislatives/proposicions-de-llei/proposicio-de-llei-qualificada-de-la-persona-i-de-la-familia[reply]

--92.76.97.233 (talk) 12:49, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is real marriage. The law explicitly defines "casamentes" as a form of "matrimoni." Moreover, both terms translate to "marriage" in English. Many countries with same-sex marriage use a different term or different process for same-sex civil marriages and religious marriages. For example, South Africa's civil marriages are under the "Civil Union Act" and the UK's same-sex marriage law explicitly bars same-sex couples from certain religious marriages. We count all of these as equal because they are functionally equal. Robsalerno (talk) 22:43, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Highly debatable I'd say. Same-sex marriage in nothern european countries is marriage - i.e. the same legal instrument that have been existing for millennia. Here it's pretty clear that a new legal instrument is being created "casamiento", which may offer pretty similar rights and obligations than standard marriage, but IS NOT marriage. The news is really that Andorra introduced Civil Unions for all (straight and gay couples), and luckly as it is 2022 no discrimination appears here. Your point that "South Africa's civil marriages are under the "Civil Union Act" and the UK's same-sex marriage law explicitly bars same-sex couples from certain religious marriages" does not prove anything, I'm sorry. That religions are granted concentius objection in some cases is not a proof that a civil union statue, like the Andorrean one, becomes a marriage statue automatically just because religious marriage is expempt from accepting same-sex couples. Touyats (talk) 05:15, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
One of the motivations for creating the bill, as layed down in its introduction (Exposició de motius - ), is eliminating the differences between Civil Unions for same-sex couples and Marriage for different-sex couples."Informe de la Comissió Legislativa d'Afers Socials i Igualtat". Butlletí del Consell General – núm. 95/2022 – 15 de juliol del 2022. p. 318.
The bill contains a definiton of "matrimoni" in Article 76 Section 1.
Two forms of marriage (matrimoni) are recognized: |a) Civil marriage (casament civil); and |b) Religious marriage (matrimoni canònic).
Article 78 states that casament civil and matrimoni canònic have the same legal effects.
"Informe de la Comissió Legislativa d'Afers Socials i Igualtat". Butlletí del Consell General – núm. 95/2022 – 15 de juliol del 2022. p. 346.
This suggests casament civil to be marriage.
Amendment 55 (Esmena 55) proposed to change the wording for civil marriage to "matrimoni civil", as they considered to term casament to be confusing. "Informe de la Ponència de la Comissió Legislativa d'Afers Socials i Igualtat". Butlletí del Consell General – núm. 95/2022 – 15 de juliol del 2022. p. 93.
The amendment was rejected. "Informe de la Comissió Legislativa d'Afers Socials i Igualtat". Butlletí del Consell General – núm. 95/2022 – 15 de juliol del 2022. p. 331.
This shows that the terminolocial difference mattered to the majority of the legislators.
It tend to agree with Robsalerno given his examples and the definition of marriage in Art. 76 Sec. 1 Personal and Family Law. Nonetheless, I have to admit that @Touyats has a point that it is suspicious that two different terms are used.
Leobadboy (talk) Leobadboy (talk) 09:58, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Amazing answer, Leobadboy. I would suggest it's a good idea to integrate it in the article's text, at least provisionally, given that it is fully sourced. Touyats (talk) 12:02, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Leobadboy I took the liberty to integrate sources you found to better explain the Social Democrats' amendment. Touyats (talk) 09:44, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 21 July 2022

Recognition of same-sex unions in AndorraSame-sex marriage in Andorra – Place here your rationale for the proposed page name change, ideally referring to applicable naming convention policies and guidelines, and providing evidence in support where appropriate. If your reasoning includes search engine results, please prioritize searches limited to reliable sources (e.g. books, news, scholarly papers) over other web results. You don't need to add your signature at the end, as this template will do so automatically. Robsalerno (talk) 22:40, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Should it be done already? Isn’t convention to change the title only when a law actually comes into force? If this is the case, we should wait for the 6 months after Macron signs the law to pass. Even though I wouldn’t mind changing it after the proclamation of the law. Cabaret Voltaire 1916 (talk) 11:15, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with the title change. Or at least, we need legal guidance. What it looks like is that Andorra never had civil marriage but only Catholic Canonical marriage and the state recognized Canonical marriage for allk intent and purposes as its own. Now they decicided to implement a civil "marriage", open to all couples (and to non-Catholic couples too) except it's not even called "marriage" but "casamiento". So, sorry, this is not marriage for all. This is a form of equalitarian civil union law. At a minimum, let's wait the 6 months to wait for opinions on the law. Touyats (talk) 05:23, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The law literally says "casamentes" are "matrimoni" -- they're the same thing, just with a slightly different word for religious marriages. No country in the world mandates same-sex religious marriages. Most countries maintain some recognition of religious marriages that are not open to same-sex couples.
"Casamente" literally translates to marriage in English. The distinction is completely unimportant. Similar distinctions in law have not generally been used to deny that marriage equality exists in other countries (eg, South Africa, Taiwan, UK...). Robsalerno (talk) 17:52, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"slightly different" is still different IMHO. "No country in the world mandates same-sex religious marriages." -> neither no one requires States to force religions to accept same-sex couples... let's not mix things up. The UK has got equal marriage, and its now called marriage both in case of same-sex marriages and opposite-sex marriages. UK's civil union law was a different beast, and it was never considered marriage even if for all intent and purposes it was practically equivalent to a (common-law) marriage. Taiwan and South Africa I dunno, but if you say so then I'm prone to say that even in that case it's not true marriage equality. Touyats (talk) 08:59, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]