Jump to content

Talk:Mark Finchem: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 9: Line 9:
:Why is Finchem listed under "American conspiracy theorists" yet Hillary Clinton (who uttered the words "vast right wing conspiracy") is not? This seems to be yet another case of anti-Republican media bias. [[Special:Contributions/2601:246:C180:79C0:C04E:F22A:733A:3BD4|2601:246:C180:79C0:C04E:F22A:733A:3BD4]] ([[User talk:2601:246:C180:79C0:C04E:F22A:733A:3BD4|talk]]) 15:49, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
:Why is Finchem listed under "American conspiracy theorists" yet Hillary Clinton (who uttered the words "vast right wing conspiracy") is not? This seems to be yet another case of anti-Republican media bias. [[Special:Contributions/2601:246:C180:79C0:C04E:F22A:733A:3BD4|2601:246:C180:79C0:C04E:F22A:733A:3BD4]] ([[User talk:2601:246:C180:79C0:C04E:F22A:733A:3BD4|talk]]) 15:49, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
:: Because multiple reliable sources refer to Finchem as a conspiracy theorist. Find one for HRC and you might be able to add it to her bio. [[User:Bangabandhu|Bangabandhu]] ([[User talk:Bangabandhu|talk]]) 20:00, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
:: Because multiple reliable sources refer to Finchem as a conspiracy theorist. Find one for HRC and you might be able to add it to her bio. [[User:Bangabandhu|Bangabandhu]] ([[User talk:Bangabandhu|talk]]) 20:00, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

== Possible illustration ==

I took [[:File:Finchem Borrelli and Rogers at the Cyber Symposium.jpg|this photo]] of Finchem and his colleagues Sonny Borrelli and Wendy Rogers when they spoke at Mike Lindell's "Cyber Symposium" last summer. Although it's best as a portrait of Rogers, the side view of Finchem in the photo isn't bad and it might make an OK illustration for the section on Finchem's respnse to the 2020 election or his promotion of conspiracy theories. [[User:Douglas W. Jones|Douglas W. Jones]] ([[User talk:Douglas W. Jones|talk]]) 03:41, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:41, 4 August 2022

WikiProject iconBiography: Politics and Government Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the politics and government work group.
WikiProject iconUnited States: Arizona / State Legislatures Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Arizona (assessed as Low-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. State Legislatures.

birthdate

can somebody add his birthdate? MrMemer223 (talk) 00:07, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why is Finchem listed under "American conspiracy theorists" yet Hillary Clinton (who uttered the words "vast right wing conspiracy") is not? This seems to be yet another case of anti-Republican media bias. 2601:246:C180:79C0:C04E:F22A:733A:3BD4 (talk) 15:49, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Because multiple reliable sources refer to Finchem as a conspiracy theorist. Find one for HRC and you might be able to add it to her bio. Bangabandhu (talk) 20:00, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Possible illustration

I took this photo of Finchem and his colleagues Sonny Borrelli and Wendy Rogers when they spoke at Mike Lindell's "Cyber Symposium" last summer. Although it's best as a portrait of Rogers, the side view of Finchem in the photo isn't bad and it might make an OK illustration for the section on Finchem's respnse to the 2020 election or his promotion of conspiracy theories. Douglas W. Jones (talk) 03:41, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]