User talk:Natalie Erin: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 17:27, 23 February 2007

Archives

/Archive 1

Infinity on High

Sorry, that was an accident. --Russ is the sex 02:39, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

Natalie, Thank you so much for quickly cleaning up my user talk page from vandalism while I was away. I get very busy sometimes, so I can't always check my userpages. I never had anyone vandalize my page so it was a surprise, and I hope I never enrage someone to do something like that. Thanks again for your quick revert, I appreciate it. --Turbinator 07:26, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Username - thanks

Thanks for pointing out that new user to me - I've opened an RfC on the name to allow an unconflicted admin to rule on it. | Mr. Darcy talk 17:06, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Falklands

Before making a flase alleghation that blanking at this article was unexpalined please read the talk page where it was explained.--Swuekilafe 18:31, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page vandalism

Thanks for cleaning up the vandalism on my talk page. I guess some vandals get a little mad when you warn them twice in the same day about vandalizing the same page. Mr.Z-mantalk 02:34, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Username Robert Hrosc

Why did you delete my post in the Man Vs. Wild page? The information that he divulges in the show can KILL you. Discovery does not mention that anywhere. People should know these things. As a survivalist I'm disgusted in the fact that Discovery Channel's attorneys don't cite these matters before each episode. People have a right to know that they are being misinformed. Regards, Rob H

It is not Wikipedia's job to make medical, legal, or other judgements, nor is it Wikipedia's place to give medical, legal, or other disclaimers. If you have issues with the content of the show, you would be better of taking those concerns to the producers of the show or similar. Natalie 03:08, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The "This user's Page has been vandalized 8 times"

Yeah the headline says it all Is that some kind of wikipedian inside joke im not in on yet or is there some real meaning behind it? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Andyzweb (talk • contribs) 04:54, 15 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Barnstar for you :)

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I've seen you all over my watchlist lately, doing all sorts of great work, and all those reports to AIV - well, all I can say is, you deserve this :) riana_dzasta 06:05, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's enormous fun :) I'm enjoying NPP even more these days, though. Take care, and see you around :) riana_dzasta 06:09, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Work on Canadian Royal Commissions

Hi Natalie, noticed you reversed some stuff I was doing on Royal Commissions. I'm removing non-significant Commissions and developing list page where I'll create a comprehensive list of Canadian commissions.

Devadasi

User Venki123 continues to delete valid references and slander and abuse me repeatedly:This person started slandering and look at the way he is swearing profusely. I have been backing up my content with references while Venki is just using foul language Revision as of 22:42 9 February 2007 . According to wiki rules he cannot verbally abuse another user. Moreover I haven't vandalised any article. I have provided valid references approved by the Govt. of India and International 1Journals and conferences. Check it out.

Mudaliar 16:52, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Revert wars initiated by user Mudaliar

Hi Natalie,

I got your message. Please see the following articles Mudaliar, Sengunthar, Kaikolar, Kaikolan, Devadasi. User:Mudaliar is slandering the group Sengunthar in all of these articles and he is editing the contents only for those purposes. He is doing the following in those articles, narrowing of scope, slandering, wrong proofs and driveling about activities deemed illegal by Govt of India. He is also creating exact duplicate articles and prevents me from using Redirecting in the following articles Sengunthar, Kaikolar, Kaikolan. He is also deleting the article Saiva Vellalar which is an entirely new article and keeps redirecting it to the article Vellalar which is an article with different scope. I have tried my level best for the past 3 months. He is also involved in personal attacks by using profane words. The admin Dina was involved in December 2006. However she seems to be inactive and is not responding. Hope you can bring in other editors to clean up these articles.

I have already tried RFC about a month ago and user:Mudaliar is unable to respond to the questions asked by me regarding validitiy of proofs used by him. What should be the next step? Please see his edit history on how intent he is on slandering Sengunthar group in the talk pages of various articles.

thnx Venki 16:56, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tamil questions

While doing article categorisation, I came across the Kaikolan and Kaikolar articles and this current edit war. Could you, perhaps, close the articles to editing for a while? Please know that these two articles appear identical. Nyttend 17:18, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I misunderstood your notes on Venki's page to mean that you were going to do the block yourself. Nyttend`

Article: Anthrax

Please clear the revision history of 2/14/2007. it is all useless and is ruining my life.

PLEASE.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Lolmfaochangjake (talk • contribs)

Jeff dean

Hi Natalie.

American history is a neat field of study. Antioch is a fine college. Minneapolis is a great city. I know about the 1940s-1950s — I was there. What do you want to know?

P.S. It's "judgment," not "judgement."

Jeff dean 00:01, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My edit to Trafficking in human beings

Hi Natalie. I agree my edit made the introduction too long. I only did it because the ‘abuse’ tag made the article look disjointed. I’ll have another look at it today. Regards. Chwyatt 09:32, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Overlake Christian Church

Hi Natalie! Thanks for cleaning that page up. It was getting pretty ugly with all the vandalism back and forth. Bigger question, what about deleting the whole page and letting start over from scratch? Get rid of all the history, etc? Or is there someone else I should talk to? Monkeyfriends133 03:05, 17 February 2007 (UTC)Monkeyfriends133[reply]

Hey, thanks for the quick reply. You must be on Wikipedia all the time! :) Anyway, thanks for your help. Monkeyfriends133 03:25, 17 February 2007 (UTC) Monkeyfriends133[reply]

Yikes! That's a lot of snow! We had a ton of that not long ago--I spent most of my time indoors, too. Thank God for the internet! ~~ Monkeyfriends133

Vandalism

I have to say, that's an impressive amount of times your page has been vandalised. :P -- Pauric (talk-contributions) 14:10, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism userpage

Totally missed your msg here. You're welcome, it gave me the opportunity to use my new blocking powers for the first time. :) Garion96 (talk) 20:15, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Apprentice

Hello, Natalie Erin and thank you for your contributions on articles related to The Apprentice UK. I'd like to invite you to become a part of WikiProject The Apprentice UK, a WikiProject aiming to improve coverage of The Apprentice UK and related articles on Wikipedia.

If you would like to help out and participate, please come over and visit us here for more information. Thanks! 80.43.22.203 20:25, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gene Simmons

Well spotted, I was busy Googling to see if it was true! --Steve _(Slf67)^talk 03:22, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Akdamien

While they were linkspamming, they do not appear to be a spambot, but just a determined linkspamming editor, after a week they will either have gone away, or hopefully decided that they can contribute productively. — xaosflux ^Talk 03:33, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

YW, glad to have helped! — xaosflux ^Talk 03:40, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! Keep up the good anti-vandalism work ... where do they all come from ... :) Antandrus (talk) 03:40, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Paul Conners

In response to your report, this user has been blocked for vandalism and harassment, by another administrator. Frankly, I was looking at the contributions and had decided to block indefinitely, but I was beaten to the button. I am allowing the shorter block to stand, but please let me know if there is any recurrence because he really is on his final warning. Regards, Newyorkbrad 22:02, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kele Okereke

About the Kele Okereke edit you bashed me for:

He's never flat-out said he is gay or bisexual, including the much-hyped review about his latest album. It's ridiculous to list him as such.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.236.217.204 (talk)

it was a puppet

Now blocked.[1] — coelacan talk — 23:00, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There's also a Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Nkras if you feel like familiarizing yourself with this user's editing style. — coelacan talk — 23:07, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks...

...for reverting the vandalism on my userpage. RJASE1 ^Talk 23:49, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wyjrnwyjwjsjysjn

I see that you warned this user. Just to let you know that blatant violation of the username policy can be reported to WP:AIV. Just add the description "username vio" or similar. In this case the name is obviously a random collection of letters... WjBscribe 01:50, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

Sorry about my edit to the Anthony page. I just didn't believe that I could actually edit anything. --TonyToTehmaX 04:15, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Madison Middle School

While it was necessary for you to delete the attempt at copywriting the page, it was definitely unnecessary to delete the section "Opinions from Students". The information in that section was obtained from a schoolwide survey; for instance, even the principal himself (James Steinhubel) can vouch that the school does suffer from graffiti. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.252.202.46 (talk)

Linkspam - http://gallery.spiritualindia.org/photos/durga/

You removed a link on Durga Maa in Wiki

Do you really think it's a link spam:

http://gallery.spiritualindia.org/photos/durga/ —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 207.46.50.75 (talk) 18:22, 20 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Thanks for the heads up on COK Natalie, I most likely became distracted by something or another. You'll see my objection plainly spoken on that site's Discussion page. Ares0524 21:38, 22 February 2007 (UTC)Ares0524[reply]

Christopher_Lotito

I have provided a detailed rebuttal to claims that I am a non-notable at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2007_February_20#Christopher_Lotito -- since you last weighed in on the topic. Please do look at it and consider the new information I've provided. Thank you.

Revision as of 17:27, 23 February 2007 edit 67.82.72.184 (talk) No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:27, 23 February 2007 edit undo 67.82.72.184 (talk) →‎Christopher_Lotito Next edit →
Line 169:		Line 169:
	==Christopher_Lotito==		==Christopher_Lotito==

	I have provided a detailed ~~rebuttable~~ to claims that I am a non-notable at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2007_February_20#Christopher_Lotito -- since you last weighed in on the topic. Please do look at it and consider the new information I've provided. Thank you.		I have provided a detailed rebuttal to claims that I am a non-notable at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2007_February_20#Christopher_Lotito -- since you last weighed in on the topic. Please do look at it and consider the new information I've provided. Thank you.