Jump to content

Talk:Paternoster Square: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Wrong years given: new section
Line 63: Line 63:


Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 08:17, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 08:17, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

== Wrong years given ==

The article implies after WWII it became "Paternoster Square". This existed already 200 years ago. So it's clearly wrong. [[Special:Contributions/79.106.209.5|79.106.209.5]] ([[User talk:79.106.209.5|talk]]) 01:24, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:24, 1 January 2023

Image

Hi, I uploaded Image:Paternoster Square.jpg to the commons which is a view from the top of St Paul's Cathedral if anyone thinks it can be used on this page. gren 23:48, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Yep, that's a good lead image - it shows the layout of the square better than any of the other images we have at the moment. On the Commons description page it would be worth mentioning the name of the building which gives this vantage point. Nicely done though. -- Solipsist 01:06, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Monks

Monks of St Paul's cathedral? It was never a monastery. St Paul's boasted canons, no doubt, and priests, but surely never monks.

19th century

This is the same area that had a high concentration of printers and booksellers in the 19th century, right? If so, it should be mentioned... AnonMoos 18:32, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi this link no longer works CWO construction of Paternoster Column — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.130.147.48 (talk) 10:35, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Paternoster Square. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:43, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Paternoster Square. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:44, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Paternoster Square. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:17, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong years given

The article implies after WWII it became "Paternoster Square". This existed already 200 years ago. So it's clearly wrong. 79.106.209.5 (talk) 01:24, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]