User talk:Ryder1992

July 2021

Hello, I'm Rdp060707. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Khá Bảnh—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. ----Rdp060707|talk 09:01, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

April 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Weston McKennie. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 14:18, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Reverts

Hi Ryder1992, please take great care when immediately reverting the edits of other editors, as you did here. I can't see anything wrong with this addition other than that a source wasn't provided. The content isn't obviously controversial and appears to have been offered in good faith. Lack of an inline source isn't always in itself a reason to revert, and I've restored this particular edit. Additionally, if you're going to revert another editor, please always use an edit summary, so that others know why you think the edit needs to be undone. Thanks, Jr8825 • Talk 23:36, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

January 2023

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. -- Yamla (talk) 12:31, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

@Yamla: I only report the puppet of Nipponese Dog Calvero in Wikipedia:Administrators noticeboard, not vandalism - testing. Ryder1992 (talk) 12:36, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

You provided absolutely no context and were reporting to the wrong place. Please use WP:AIV. --Yamla (talk) 12:49, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Ah, I see what you were doing. Next time, please provide sufficient context to understand your report. --Yamla (talk) 12:52, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Cancelo Revert

Hi, just querying as to whether you would agree that this diff was perhaps slightly overzealous? Whilst I agree that edits to the lede and infobox are out of order, the additional section which you removed in this edit, written by myself, was sourced adequately enough to remain in my opinion. Just soliciting your opinion to avoid reverting a revert. Thanks. Stormy clouds (talk) 16:05, 30 January 2023 (UTC)