Jump to content

Talk:Sino-Nepalese War: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 27: Line 27:
:: The Latinized "Sino-Nepalese" makes it appear as if it is standard term. But it is not.
:: The Latinized "Sino-Nepalese" makes it appear as if it is standard term. But it is not.
:: I don't think splitting the article is helpful. It should be titled something like "Nepal–Tibet Wars, 1788–1793". -- [[User:Kautilya3|Kautilya3]] ([[User talk:Kautilya3|talk]]) 16:19, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
:: I don't think splitting the article is helpful. It should be titled something like "Nepal–Tibet Wars, 1788–1793". -- [[User:Kautilya3|Kautilya3]] ([[User talk:Kautilya3|talk]]) 16:19, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

== Numbers of losses ==

Can someone please gain some estimates of losses of both sides? [[Special:Contributions/165.234.101.99|165.234.101.99]] ([[User talk:165.234.101.99|talk]]) 14:41, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:41, 19 April 2023

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:11, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nepalese Victory?

How was this a Nepalese victory? They ended up paying tribute to the Qing emperor. The line about the Nepalese victory doesn't seem to take into account the second invasion.

73.254.192.168 (talk) 20:22, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Split article

The article should be split into First Nepal-Tibet War to avoid confusion. Thanks. Bada Kaji (talk • श्रीमान् गम्भीर) 16:01, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a good summary article. There is potential probably for more than one sub-articles. But I don't see how it is confusing. I would ask that you provide a more detailed rationale. Specifically, what scope do you envision for this article and the new article respectively if split? Regards! Usedtobecool ☎️ 13:38, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It is confusing in that it represents China's view of the world, not ours. The page "Third Nepal–Tibet War" implies that the first two "Nepal-Tibet Wars" are covered on this page. The first one had no Chinese participation. The second one was fought jointly by Tibet and China, and China came in only because Tibet requested it. If Tibet were China (as is now claimed), China would have needed no invitation!
Leo Rose's Nepal – Strategy for Survival calls the first war "THE FIRST NEPALI-TIBETAN WAR". The second war has a whole chapter titled "China's Trans-Himalayan Adventure: The Nepali-Chinese War, 1791-93". The war itself is covered in a section titled "THE SECOND NEPALI-TIBETAN WAR".
The Latinized "Sino-Nepalese" makes it appear as if it is standard term. But it is not.
I don't think splitting the article is helpful. It should be titled something like "Nepal–Tibet Wars, 1788–1793". -- Kautilya3 (talk) 16:19, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Numbers of losses

Can someone please gain some estimates of losses of both sides? 165.234.101.99 (talk) 14:41, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]