Talk:Time–space compression: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
→No mention of Zygmunt Bauman?: new section |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
''"Globalisation" is currently one of the most frequently-used and most powerful terms in our geographical and social imaginations. At its extreme (and though "extreme" this version is nonetheless highly popular) what it calls up is a vision of total unfettered mobility; of free unbounded space. (...) At its worst, it has become something of a mantra. Characteristic words and phrases make an obligatory appearance: instantaneous; Internet; financial trading; the margins invading the centre; the annihilation of space by time. In these texts, the emerging world economy will be captured by an iconic economics: reference to CNN, McDonald's, Sony. And judicious alliterations will strive to convey the maziness of it all: Beijing - Bombay - Bamako - Burnley. (...) It is also a vision which, although apparently in some sense glorying in the recognition of the spatial (while at the same time speaking of its annihilation) makes me very uneasy.'' (Doreen Massey, "[http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057%2F9780230378537_2 Imagining Globalisation: power-geometries of time-space]" |
''"Globalisation" is currently one of the most frequently-used and most powerful terms in our geographical and social imaginations. At its extreme (and though "extreme" this version is nonetheless highly popular) what it calls up is a vision of total unfettered mobility; of free unbounded space. (...) At its worst, it has become something of a mantra. Characteristic words and phrases make an obligatory appearance: instantaneous; Internet; financial trading; the margins invading the centre; the annihilation of space by time. In these texts, the emerging world economy will be captured by an iconic economics: reference to CNN, McDonald's, Sony. And judicious alliterations will strive to convey the maziness of it all: Beijing - Bombay - Bamako - Burnley. (...) It is also a vision which, although apparently in some sense glorying in the recognition of the spatial (while at the same time speaking of its annihilation) makes me very uneasy.'' (Doreen Massey, "[http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057%2F9780230378537_2 Imagining Globalisation: power-geometries of time-space]" |
||
From this text it appears clear that she would fit better in the "Criticism" part of the page. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/159.92.238.60|159.92.238.60]] ([[User talk:159.92.238.60#top|talk]]) 14:42, 9 February 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
From this text it appears clear that she would fit better in the "Criticism" part of the page. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/159.92.238.60|159.92.238.60]] ([[User talk:159.92.238.60#top|talk]]) 14:42, 9 February 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
== No mention of Zygmunt Bauman? == |
|||
This article doesn't mention Zygmunt Bauman or Thomas Eriksen or any of the other scholars working this topic. |
|||
Why not? Thanks! [[Special:Contributions/50.4.132.185|50.4.132.185]] ([[User talk:50.4.132.185|talk]]) 21:02, 27 May 2023 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 21:02, 27 May 2023
 | Sociology Start‑class | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
this is a very interesting article. thank you wikipedia for all the information. it was a big help. i will use wikipedia a lot from now on.
i as well found this to be quite the information for taking in. i find the information on wikipedia a lot helpful too. i never use wikipedia but now will much more. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.116.23.68 (talk) 21:00, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
also known as?
Is time-space compression (Harvey) and space-time-distanciation (Giddens) really the same?! I really doubt that. --Jojona (talk) 16:46, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
Doreen Massey
There seems to be a misunderstanding or a lack of clarity on Massey's use of the concept: Massey uses the term to criticise the idea that globalisation is merely a question of historical progress: "Globalisation" is currently one of the most frequently-used and most powerful terms in our geographical and social imaginations. At its extreme (and though "extreme" this version is nonetheless highly popular) what it calls up is a vision of total unfettered mobility; of free unbounded space. (...) At its worst, it has become something of a mantra. Characteristic words and phrases make an obligatory appearance: instantaneous; Internet; financial trading; the margins invading the centre; the annihilation of space by time. In these texts, the emerging world economy will be captured by an iconic economics: reference to CNN, McDonald's, Sony. And judicious alliterations will strive to convey the maziness of it all: Beijing - Bombay - Bamako - Burnley. (...) It is also a vision which, although apparently in some sense glorying in the recognition of the spatial (while at the same time speaking of its annihilation) makes me very uneasy. (Doreen Massey, "Imagining Globalisation: power-geometries of time-space" From this text it appears clear that she would fit better in the "Criticism" part of the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.92.238.60 (talk) 14:42, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
No mention of Zygmunt Bauman?
This article doesn't mention Zygmunt Bauman or Thomas Eriksen or any of the other scholars working this topic. Why not? Thanks! 50.4.132.185 (talk) 21:02, 27 May 2023 (UTC)