Jump to content

Jolyon Maugham: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 1161478847 by Atchom (talk) per WP:BLPRESTORE. The content was removed on good faith BLP grounds, and should not be restored without an affirmative consensus on the talk page.
Tags: Undo Reverted
Undid revision 1161494645 by Sideswipe9th (talk)
Tags: Undo Reverted
Line 34: Line 34:
Maugham completed his [[pupillage]] in the [[barristers' chambers|chambers]] of [[Lord Irvine]].<ref name=guardian/> He became a [[Queen's Counsel]] in 2015.<ref name="Dev"/> Maugham was a tenant at Devereux Chambers, specialising in taxation law. He left Devereux Chambers at the end of 2020.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://twitter.com/jolyonmaugham/status/1338828720338046976|last=Maugham|first=Jolyon|title=Moving offices in advance of my end of year departure from Devereux Chambers|date=15 December 2020|access-date=8 April 2022|website=Twitter|language=en}}</ref>
Maugham completed his [[pupillage]] in the [[barristers' chambers|chambers]] of [[Lord Irvine]].<ref name=guardian/> He became a [[Queen's Counsel]] in 2015.<ref name="Dev"/> Maugham was a tenant at Devereux Chambers, specialising in taxation law. He left Devereux Chambers at the end of 2020.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://twitter.com/jolyonmaugham/status/1338828720338046976|last=Maugham|first=Jolyon|title=Moving offices in advance of my end of year departure from Devereux Chambers|date=15 December 2020|access-date=8 April 2022|website=Twitter|language=en}}</ref>


In 2023, Maugham published a book, ''Bringing Down Goliath: How Good Law Can Topple the Powerful'', which looked at three cases and what they can tell us about using the law for social good.<ref>https://guardianbookshop.com/bringing-down-goliath-9780753559789</ref> Yuan Yi Zhu in [[The Times|The ''Times'']] described it as "the pompous bloviating of a Twitter KC".<ref>{{Cite news |last=Zhu |first=Yuan Yi |date=2023-06-11 |title=Bringing Down Goliath by Jolyon Maugham review — the pompous bloviating of a Twitter KC |language=en |work=[[The Times]] |url=https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/bringing-down-goliath-by-jolyon-maugham-review-2x2df8qcx |access-date=2023-06-11 |issn=}}</ref>
In 2023, Maugham published a book, ''Bringing Down Goliath: How Good Law Can Topple the Powerful'', which looked at three cases and what they can tell us about using the law for social good.<ref>https://guardianbookshop.com/bringing-down-goliath-9780753559789</ref> Yuan Yi Zhu in [[The Times|The ''Times'']] described it as "the pompous bloviating of a Twitter KC".<ref>{{Cite news |last=Zhu |first=Yuan Yi |date=2023-06-11 |title=Bringing Down Goliath by Jolyon Maugham review — the pompous bloviating of a Twitter KC |language=en |work=[[The Times]] |url=https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/bringing-down-goliath-by-jolyon-maugham-review-2x2df8qcx |access-date=2023-06-11 |issn=}}</ref> Maugham claimed that Zhu's negative ''Times'' review was the result of the newapaper's politics, leading to mockery from author [[J. K. Rowling]], who said that authors should "never go full Joylon" in response to negative reviews, resulting in a further online spat between Maugham and Rowling.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Heap |first=Emily-Jane |date=2023-04-22 |title=JK Rowling in trans row with Left-wing lawyer over ‘stinker’ book review |language=en-GB |work=The Telegraph |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/04/22/jk-rowling-trans-row-jolyon-maugham-kc-book-review/ |access-date=2023-06-11 |issn=0307-1235}}</ref>


==Involvement in politics==
==Involvement in politics==
Line 60: Line 60:
=== Criticism of judges ===
=== Criticism of judges ===
In 2019, Maugham was criticized by many in the legal community after he accused two High Court judges, [[Jonathan Swift (judge)|Mr Justice Swift]] and [[Michael Supperstone|Mr Justice Supperstone]], of being biased in favour of the government after Mr Justice Swift refused permission to Good Law Project to bring a legal challenge against Brexit.<ref>{{Cite web |last=McKinney |first=CJ |date=26 March 2019 |title=Jolyon Maugham QC suffers backlash on Twitter after calling High Court judge 'pro-Government' |url=https://www.legalcheek.com/2019/03/jolyon-maugham-qc-suffers-backlash-on-twitter-after-calling-high-court-judge-pro-government/ |website=Legal Cheek}}</ref>
In 2019, Maugham was criticized by many in the legal community after he accused two High Court judges, [[Jonathan Swift (judge)|Mr Justice Swift]] and [[Michael Supperstone|Mr Justice Supperstone]], of being biased in favour of the government after Mr Justice Swift refused permission to Good Law Project to bring a legal challenge against Brexit.<ref>{{Cite web |last=McKinney |first=CJ |date=26 March 2019 |title=Jolyon Maugham QC suffers backlash on Twitter after calling High Court judge 'pro-Government' |url=https://www.legalcheek.com/2019/03/jolyon-maugham-qc-suffers-backlash-on-twitter-after-calling-high-court-judge-pro-government/ |website=Legal Cheek}}</ref>

In 2021, Maugham was further criticized for suggesting that [[Nathalie Lieven|Mrs Justice Lieven]] was transphobic after she ruled in ''[[Bell v Tavistock]]'' that it was unlikely that a child under the age of 16 could be ''Gillick'' competent to consent to puberty blocking treatment.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2021-04-10 |title=A QC’s truth {{!}} Sarah Phillimore |url=https://thecritic.co.uk/the-truth-must-be-spoken/ |access-date=2023-06-22 |website=The Critic Magazine |language=en-GB}}</ref>


===Doxing of home address===
===Doxing of home address===

Revision as of 03:04, 23 June 2023

Jolyon Maugham
Born
Jolyon Toby Dennis Maugham

(1971-07-01) 1 July 1971 (age 52)
St Pancras, London, England
NationalityBritish, New Zealander
Education
OccupationBarrister
Known forBrexit litigation
Spouse
Claire Prihartini
(m. 2007)
Parent

Jolyon Toby Dennis Maugham KC (/mɔːm/; born 1 July 1971)[1] is a British barrister.[2] A taxation law specialist, he is the founder and director of the Good Law Project, through which he has played a role in bringing to court a number of legal challenges to the Brexit process, which he opposed. He has written on Brexit and legal issues for publications such as The Daily Telegraph,[3] The Guardian[4] and the New Statesman.[5]

Maugham has been at the centre of a number of controversies: a 2022 profile in The Times described him as "the Marmite of the Bar", who "rose from relative obscurity to found the Good Law Project".[6]

Biography

Maugham is the son of the novelist David Benedictus, although they did not meet until Maugham was 17. He was brought up in New Zealand by his English mother, Lynne Joyce Maugham, and his adoptive father, Alan Barker.[1][7][8] At 16 he had to leave his parents' house after a dispute, and did cleaning work. He went to England in 1989[9] and stayed with his mother's father after finishing school.[10]

Maugham went to Wellington High School, New Zealand.[1] He graduated with a first-class LLB in European Legal Studies from Durham University (Hatfield College) in 1995.[11] He also spent some time in Belgium at the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, studying under Walter Van Gerven,[12] and later completed an MA at Birkbeck, University of London.[2] As a student he was sent by a temping agency to carry out secretarial work at a law firm, but was sent back for being a man. Maugham sued, claiming to be a victim of sex discrimination, and was awarded compensation.[13]

Maugham completed his pupillage in the chambers of Lord Irvine.[13] He became a Queen's Counsel in 2015.[2] Maugham was a tenant at Devereux Chambers, specialising in taxation law. He left Devereux Chambers at the end of 2020.[14]

In 2023, Maugham published a book, Bringing Down Goliath: How Good Law Can Topple the Powerful, which looked at three cases and what they can tell us about using the law for social good.[15] Yuan Yi Zhu in The Times described it as "the pompous bloviating of a Twitter KC".[16] Maugham claimed that Zhu's negative Times review was the result of the newapaper's politics, leading to mockery from author J. K. Rowling, who said that authors should "never go full Joylon" in response to negative reviews, resulting in a further online spat between Maugham and Rowling.[17]

Involvement in politics

Legal challenges to Brexit

Maugham's cases include an unsuccessful case by British expatriates in Europe who objected to their loss of European Union citizenship,[18][19] a case to clarify whether the Brexit process can be reversed by Parliament,[20] and a failed legal challenge to referendum spending by Vote Leave.[21][22]

Affiliations with political parties

Maugham had advised the Labour Party on tax policy under Ed Miliband.[23] He was formerly on the advisory council of liberal conservative think tank Bright Blue, which advises the Conservative Party.[24] The Times reported that Maugham "flirted with Labour in the run-up to the 2015 election, harbouring a fleeting fantasy of becoming attorney-general".[25]

In April 2017, Maugham reportedly contemplated forming a new centrist political party, "Spring",[26] and standing for election against Prime Minister Theresa May in her constituency of Maidenhead,[27] but decided against it.[28][29][30]

The Good Law Project

Maugham is on the Board of the Good Law Project, a not-for-profit campaign organisation that aims to use the law to protect the interests of the public.

During the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom, Maugham and the Good Law Project challenged the appointments of key figures in the British government's pandemic response, such as Kate Bingham and Baroness Harding. GLP alleged their appointments were the result of a "culture of cronyism and the highly secretive use of billions of pounds of public funds".[10] In June 2021, the challenge against the appointment of Bingham was dropped.[31] Bingham's work on the UK's vaccination rollout programme has been praised by scientists and international media,[32][33][34] particularly for securing 350 million doses of six vaccines and setting up infrastructure for clinical trials, manufacturing and distribution.[34]

In November 2021, a company which supplied face shields during the COVID-19 pandemic announced it was suing GLP for defamation after it alleged the firm had obtained its contract through political connections and had supplied substandard equipment, without evidence.[35] The same month, Maugham had to apologize on behalf of GLP to the Health Secretary and the High Court after breaching civil procedure rules in a case concerning the supply of PPE equipment.[36]

Transgender rights

Maugham has been an outspoken supporter of transgender rights and as of November 2020 is representing a transgender boy in a lawsuit against the NHS over treatment delays.[37] As of June 2021, Maugham is involved in an appeal against a decision to award charitable status to LGB Alliance on the basis that it did not "meet the threshold tests to be registered as a charity";[38] Maugham has spoken publicly about the charity, which he accused of being "a transphobic hate group."[39]

Controversies

Criticism of judges

In 2019, Maugham was criticized by many in the legal community after he accused two High Court judges, Mr Justice Swift and Mr Justice Supperstone, of being biased in favour of the government after Mr Justice Swift refused permission to Good Law Project to bring a legal challenge against Brexit.[40]

In 2021, Maugham was further criticized for suggesting that Mrs Justice Lieven was transphobic after she ruled in Bell v Tavistock that it was unlikely that a child under the age of 16 could be Gillick competent to consent to puberty blocking treatment.[41]

Doxing of home address

In late 2019 Maugham accused the talkRADIO presenter Julia Hartley-Brewer of revealing his home address at a time when he was receiving death threats.[42] He also criticised the television programme Question Time for allowing Hartley-Brewer to appear as a panellist.[42] Hartley-Brewer defended herself by saying Maugham's address was already easily available online and that he had previously revealed it himself in published interviews.[42]

Killing of a fox

Jolyon Maugham QC Twitter logo, a stylized blue bird
@JolyonMaugham

Already this morning I have killed a fox with a baseball bat. How's your Boxing Day going?

26 December 2019[43]

On the morning of 26 December 2019 (Boxing Day), Maugham stated in a Twitter post that he had "killed a fox with a baseball bat" whilst wearing his wife's kimono.[44][45] Maugham claimed that the fox was entrapped by the netting surrounding a hen house in his garden. The killing drew widespread condemnation and received extensive coverage, domestically and internationally.[44][46][45] The Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals investigated the matter,[47][44][48][46][49] but decided not to prosecute because a post-mortem showed the fox had been killed swiftly, meaning that "the evidential threshold needed to take a prosecution under the CPS code was not met".[50]

In 2021, Maugham claimed he and his chambers were blacklisted by law firm Allen & Overy after he killed the fox.[51]

Breach of court rules

In 2021, Maugham had to apologize after Good Law Project published a witness statement before it was put into evidence, thus breaching High Court litigation rules.[52]

Apologies for social media statements

In 2020, Maugham had to apologize after comparing Dominic Cummings breaching COVID-19 lockdown rules to ‘a man with HIV having unprotected sex’, which was widely decried as offensive.[53]

In 2022, Maugham was forced to apologize after falsely claiming he won a judicial review against Matt Hancock, the former Secretary of State for Health, in which he had claimed that Dido Harding and Mike Coupe were given appointments because of their "personal or political connections" to politicians. The High Court had in fact ruled that "The evidence provides no support for this at all. Baroness Harding had previous relevant experience of senior positions in large retail businesses and in the NHS. Mr Coupe had vast experience of managing complex public-facing organisations".[54]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c "Maugham, Jolyon Toby Dennis". Who's Who. Oxford: A & C Black. 2015. doi:10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.U283232. ISBN 978-0-19-954088-4.
  2. ^ a b c "Jolyon Maugham QC - Profile". devereuxchambers.co.uk. Devereaux Chambers. Archived from the original on 22 April 2018.
  3. ^ Maugham, Jolyon (19 November 2016). "How Nicola Sturgeon could shake up 'cosy consensus' and use Article 50 to wrest back control of Scotland's future". The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 22 April 2018.
  4. ^ "Jolyon Maugham". The Guardian. Retrieved 22 April 2018.
  5. ^ "Jolyon Maugham". New Statesman. Retrieved 22 April 2018.
  6. ^ Baksi, Catherine (24 February 2022). "Judges slap down busybody litigants". The Times.
  7. ^ Eleftheriou-Smith, Loulla-Mae (29 August 2017). "Katie Hopkins' attempt to shame barrister on Twitter for having an Etonian father backfires". The Independent. Archived from the original on 14 June 2022. Retrieved 22 April 2018.
  8. ^ Maugham, Jolyon (31 August 2017). "We're too fixated on class. What matters is our ability to understand others". The Guardian. Article with brief autobiography.
  9. ^ Maugham, Jolyon (9 April 2022). "Jo Maugham". Twitter. Retrieved 9 April 2022.
  10. ^ a b Adams, Tim (22 November 2020). "'I don't like acts of dishonesty by the state': Jolyon Maugham QC on Covid cronyism". The Observer.
  11. ^ Moyes, W.A. (1996). Hatfield 1846-1996: A history of Hatfield College in the University of Durham. Hatfield College Trust. p. 315. ISBN 978-0-903324-01-4.
  12. ^ O'Brien, James (2 September 2021). "Full Disclosure : Jolyon Maugham" (podcast - 00:33:00). LBC.
  13. ^ a b Stuart, Liz; Ram, Natasha (6 January 2001). "Jobs and Money: Barristers". The Guardian. Retrieved 17 September 2019.
  14. ^ Maugham, Jolyon (15 December 2020). "Moving offices in advance of my end of year departure from Devereux Chambers". Twitter. Retrieved 8 April 2022.
  15. ^ https://guardianbookshop.com/bringing-down-goliath-9780753559789
  16. ^ Zhu, Yuan Yi (11 June 2023). "Bringing Down Goliath by Jolyon Maugham review — the pompous bloviating of a Twitter KC". The Times. Retrieved 11 June 2023.
  17. ^ Heap, Emily-Jane (22 April 2023). "JK Rowling in trans row with Left-wing lawyer over 'stinker' book review". The Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 11 June 2023.
  18. ^ O'Carrol, Lisa (17 January 2017). "Britons tell Dutch court their EU rights cannot be removed". The Guardian. Retrieved 22 April 2018.
  19. ^ Maugham, Jolyon (1 March 2018). "Our rights to EU citizenship are worth fighting for – despite Brexit". The Guardian. Retrieved 22 April 2018.
  20. ^ O'Leary, Elisabeth (20 March 2018). "Court rules in favour of case on Britain's ability to reverse Brexit". Reuters. Retrieved 22 April 2018.
  21. ^ George, Hannah (23 March 2018). "Anti-Brexit group wins challenge against 'Vote Leave' spending". Bloomberg News. Retrieved 22 April 2018.
  22. ^ Dickie, Mure; Croft, Jane (17 April 2018). "UK asks Supreme Court to rule on Scottish and Welsh Brexit laws". Financial Times. Retrieved 22 April 2018.
  23. ^ Swinford, Stephen (8 April 2015). "Labour's non-dom adviser represented celebrity tax dodge film schemes". The Telegraph. Retrieved 22 April 2018.
  24. ^ "Advisory council". brightblue.org.uk. Bright Blue. 8 July 2018. Archived from the original on 8 July 2018. Retrieved 8 July 2018.
  25. ^ Lang, Kirsty. "The activist lawyers taking on the government". The Times. ISSN 0140-0460. Retrieved 22 November 2021.
  26. ^ Di Stefano, Mark; Waterson, Jim (18 October 2017). "People keep trying to start pro-EU British centrist movements on Twitter". BuzzFeed. Retrieved 5 October 2018.
  27. ^ Maugham, Jolyon (17 April 2017). Spring The Party (PDF). Retrieved 2 October 2018.
  28. ^ "Statement of persons nominated - Maidenhead". Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead. Archived from the original on 2 August 2017. Retrieved 2 October 2018.
  29. ^ McDonald, Karl (9 April 2018). "All the centrist parties that have already failed since Britain voted for Brexit". i. Retrieved 2 October 2018.
  30. ^ "Jolyon Maugham QC". Legal Cheek. 27 April 2017. Retrieved 7 January 2019.
  31. ^ In 2022 he lost on all points in his case against Harding"Legal action over Kate Bingham's role in UK Covid vaccine taskforce dropped". The Guardian. 23 June 2021. Retrieved 22 November 2021.
  32. ^ Landler, Mark; Mueller, Benjamin (29 January 2021). "Vaccine Rollout Gives U.K. a Rare Win in the Pandemic". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2 May 2021.
  33. ^ Balls, Katy (6 February 2021). "Secrets of the Vaccine Taskforce's success". www.spectator.co.uk. Archived from the original on 4 February 2021. Retrieved 2 May 2021.
  34. ^ a b Cookson, Clive (13 November 2020). "Scientists defend controversial head of UK vaccine task force". Financial Times. Archived from the original on 13 November 2020. Retrieved 2 May 2021.
  35. ^ "Stroud company to sue the Good Law Project over PPE claims". BBC News. 10 November 2021. Retrieved 22 November 2021.
  36. ^ Hyde2021-11-15T16:56:00+00:00, John. "Maugham apologises for Good Law Project's procedure rules mistake". Law Gazette. Retrieved 22 November 2021.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  37. ^ Hunte, Ben (23 November 2020). "Trans teen in legal action over gender clinic wait". BBC News. Retrieved 22 December 2020.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  38. ^ Parsons, Vic (2 June 2021). "LGBT+ groups appeal decision to register anti-trans LGB Alliance as charity". PinkNews. Retrieved 2 June 2021.
  39. ^ Parsons, Vic (27 April 2021). "What we can learn from LGB Alliance, Keira Bell and the hostile anti-trans media". PinkNews. Retrieved 2 June 2021.
  40. ^ McKinney, CJ (26 March 2019). "Jolyon Maugham QC suffers backlash on Twitter after calling High Court judge 'pro-Government'". Legal Cheek.
  41. ^ "A QC's truth | Sarah Phillimore". The Critic Magazine. 10 April 2021. Retrieved 22 June 2023.
  42. ^ a b c Bond, Kimberley (10 October 2019). "Julia Hartley-Brewer to feature on Question Time despite boycott". Radio Times. Retrieved 29 December 2019.
  43. ^ Jolyon Maugham QC [@JolyonMaugham] (26 December 2019). "Already this morning I have killed a fox with a baseball bat. How's your Boxing Day going?" (Tweet) – via Twitter.
  44. ^ a b c Gayle, Damien (26 December 2019). "Prominent lawyer Jolyon Maugham clubs fox to death while wearing kimono". The Guardian. Retrieved 26 December 2019.
  45. ^ a b Booth, William (30 December 2019). "A British barrister was famous for battling Brexit. Then he beat a fox to death, while wearing a kimono". The Washington Post.
  46. ^ a b Dearden, Lizzie (26 December 2019). "Prominent lawyer sparks backlash with tweet about 'killing fox with baseball bat'". The Independent. Archived from the original on 14 June 2022. Retrieved 26 December 2019.
  47. ^ "RSPCA investigates after lawyer Jolyon Maugham kills fox with baseball bat". BBC News. 27 December 2019. Retrieved 29 December 2019.
  48. ^ Gayle, Damien (27 December 2019). "RSPCA investigates after lawyer Jolyon Maugham kills fox". The Guardian. Retrieved 27 December 2019.
  49. ^ Doherty-Cove, Jody (27 December 2019). "Sussex windmill owner 'killed fox with baseball bat'". The Argus. Retrieved 27 December 2019.
  50. ^ "Fox-killing lawyer Jolyon Maugham will not be charged, says RSPCA". BBC. 5 March 2020. Retrieved 22 May 2020.
  51. ^ Connelly, Thomas (15 February 2021). "Jo Maugham QC claims Allen & Overy blacklisted him and his chambers".
  52. ^ Hyde, John (15 November 2021). "Maugham apologises for Good Law Project's procedure rules mistake". The Law Society Gazette.
  53. ^ Milton, Josh (25 May 2020). "Lawyer best-known for clubbing a fox to death apologises after comparing Dominic Cummings to 'a man with HIV having unprotected sex'". PinkNews.
  54. ^ Willems, Michiel (17 February 2022). "Barrister Jolyon Maugham QC apologises for falsely claiming court victory against Matt Hancock". City A.M.

External links