User talk:RickDoesYT

June 2022

The page Draft:4D Miner Wiki doesn't at present have any substantial content, and appears to serve no purpose other than publicising a wiki on Fandom. Since that is contrary to Wikipedia’s policy against using Wikipedia for promotion of any kind, I shall delete the page. You are, of course, very welcome to start making contributions to the encyclopaedia, in line with Wikipedia policies and guidelines, if you are interested in doing so, but if your only interest is in attracting people to your Fandom wiki, then Wikipedia is not the right place to do it. JBW (talk) 08:05, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 4D Miner Wiki (June 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nearlyevil665 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:4D Miner Wiki and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:4D Miner Wiki, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

nearlyevil665 09:51, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello, RickDoesYT! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! nearlyevil665 09:51, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:4D Miner Wiki

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:4D Miner Wiki, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. nearlyevil665 09:51, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Almost all of us, when we start editing Wikipedia, know little or nothing about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, so nobody can be blamed for starting out doing things that are contrary to policies and guidelines that they don't know about. However, continuing to do the same things after being told about the relevant policies and guidelines is a different matter.JBW (talk) 10:29, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing, because it is clear that you are not here not to contribute to building the encyclopedia, but to use Wikipedia as a webhost for things unrelated to work for Wikipedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JBW (talk) 13:30, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

UTRS appeal #59021

is closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:12, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RickDoesYT (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

'I have learnt from my past mistakes and I think it has been long enough to prove that.'

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 13:40, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

RickDoesYT (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I understand what I was blocked for 1 year ago, but as it's been 1 year I think I should be unblocked because now, the only thing I'll use this account for is fixing typos and updating information on existing pages, yes, I know what I did 1 year ago was wrong & stupid and I shouldn't have done that, but I personally think 1 year is long enough and I would like to please be unblocked. RickDoesYT (talk) 10:51, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I understand what I was blocked for 1 year ago, but as it's been 1 year I think I should be unblocked because now, the only thing I'll use this account for is fixing typos and updating information on existing pages, yes, I know what I did 1 year ago was wrong & stupid and I shouldn't have done that, but I personally think 1 year is long enough and I would like to please be unblocked. [[User:RickDoesYT|RickDoesYT]] ([[User talk:RickDoesYT#top|talk]]) 10:51, 24 July 2023 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I understand what I was blocked for 1 year ago, but as it's been 1 year I think I should be unblocked because now, the only thing I'll use this account for is fixing typos and updating information on existing pages, yes, I know what I did 1 year ago was wrong & stupid and I shouldn't have done that, but I personally think 1 year is long enough and I would like to please be unblocked. [[User:RickDoesYT|RickDoesYT]] ([[User talk:RickDoesYT#top|talk]]) 10:51, 24 July 2023 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I understand what I was blocked for 1 year ago, but as it's been 1 year I think I should be unblocked because now, the only thing I'll use this account for is fixing typos and updating information on existing pages, yes, I know what I did 1 year ago was wrong & stupid and I shouldn't have done that, but I personally think 1 year is long enough and I would like to please be unblocked. [[User:RickDoesYT|RickDoesYT]] ([[User talk:RickDoesYT#top|talk]]) 10:51, 24 July 2023 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

RickDoesYT (talk) 10:51, 24 July 2023 (UTC)