Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 13: Line 13:
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Tea Culture in Japan | 2 = Tea culture in Japan | discuss = yes | reason = WP:NCCAPS | sig = [[Special:Contributions/2A00:23EE:15F8:3F31:902F:59FF:FE15:F39B|2A00:23EE:15F8:3F31:902F:59FF:FE15:F39B]] ([[User talk:2A00:23EE:15F8:3F31:902F:59FF:FE15:F39B|talk]]) 22:38, 31 July 2023 (UTC) | requester = 2A00:23EE:15F8:3F31:902F:59FF:FE15:F39B}}
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Tea Culture in Japan | 2 = Tea culture in Japan | discuss = yes | reason = WP:NCCAPS | sig = [[Special:Contributions/2A00:23EE:15F8:3F31:902F:59FF:FE15:F39B|2A00:23EE:15F8:3F31:902F:59FF:FE15:F39B]] ([[User talk:2A00:23EE:15F8:3F31:902F:59FF:FE15:F39B|talk]]) 22:38, 31 July 2023 (UTC) | requester = 2A00:23EE:15F8:3F31:902F:59FF:FE15:F39B}}
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = MLB on Fox | 2 = Major League Baseball on Fox | discuss = no | reason = the article title should be reverted back to where it was previously, in order to conform with naming conventions for other "Major League Baseball on X" article titles, templates & namespaces. | sig = [[User:Charlesaaronthompson|Charlesaaronthompson]] ([[User talk:Charlesaaronthompson|talk]]) 20:03, 31 July 2023 (UTC) }}
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = MLB on Fox | 2 = Major League Baseball on Fox | discuss = no | reason = the article title should be reverted back to where it was previously, in order to conform with naming conventions for other "Major League Baseball on X" article titles, templates & namespaces. | sig = [[User:Charlesaaronthompson|Charlesaaronthompson]] ([[User talk:Charlesaaronthompson|talk]]) 20:03, 31 July 2023 (UTC) }}
*:Recent RM in opposite direction. Please start a new RM if you want this moved. [[User:DrVogel|Dr. Vogel]] ([[User talk:DrVogel|talk]]) 23:50, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Westcote | 2 = Westcote (Cranston, Rhode Island) | discuss = yes | reason = DAB from [[Westcote, Gloucestershire]], a parish is more important than a single house. The base name should be a DAB if not for the parish. | sig = '''[[User:Crouch, Swale|<span style="color:Green">Crouch, Swale</span>]]''' ([[User talk:Crouch, Swale|<span style="color:Blue">talk</span>]]) 18:49, 31 July 2023 (UTC) | requester = Crouch, Swale}}
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Westcote | 2 = Westcote (Cranston, Rhode Island) | discuss = yes | reason = DAB from [[Westcote, Gloucestershire]], a parish is more important than a single house. The base name should be a DAB if not for the parish. | sig = '''[[User:Crouch, Swale|<span style="color:Green">Crouch, Swale</span>]]''' ([[User talk:Crouch, Swale|<span style="color:Blue">talk</span>]]) 18:49, 31 July 2023 (UTC) | requester = Crouch, Swale}}
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Template:Piracy opentask | 2 = Template:WikiProject Piracy/opentask | discuss = yes | reason = indicate scope and association for this work template -- NOTE: {{tl|WikiProject Piracy}} coding will need to be updated to indicate the new name of this subtemplate. -- | sig = [[Special:Contributions/67.70.25.80|67.70.25.80]] ([[User talk:67.70.25.80|talk]]) 21:07, 30 July 2023 (UTC) | requester = 67.70.25.80}}
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Template:Piracy opentask | 2 = Template:WikiProject Piracy/opentask | discuss = yes | reason = indicate scope and association for this work template -- NOTE: {{tl|WikiProject Piracy}} coding will need to be updated to indicate the new name of this subtemplate. -- | sig = [[Special:Contributions/67.70.25.80|67.70.25.80]] ([[User talk:67.70.25.80|talk]]) 21:07, 30 July 2023 (UTC) | requester = 67.70.25.80}}

Revision as of 23:50, 31 July 2023

If you are unable to complete a move for technical reasons, you can request technical help below. This is the correct method if you tried to move a page, but you got an error message saying something like "You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reasons:..." or "The/This page could not be moved, for the following reason:..."

  • To list a technical request: edit the Uncontroversial technical requests subsection and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:

    {{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}

    This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page.
  • If you object to a proposal listed in the uncontroversial technical requests section, please move the request to the Contested technical requests section, append a note on the request elaborating on why, and sign with ~~~~. Consider pinging the requester to let them know about the objection.
  • If your technical request is contested, or if a contested request is left untouched without reply, create a requested move on the article talk and remove the request from the section here. The fastest and easiest way is to click the "discuss" button at the request, save the talk page, and remove the entry on this page.

Technical requests

Uncontroversial technical requests

Requests to revert undiscussed moves

Contested technical requests

@Jcitawy: None of the articles in Category:Reconstructed words currently have an asterisk in the title. Rather than changing the consistent titling in an undiscussed move, this should be a requested move. The request should probably be to move multiple pages (e.g., all PIE and PG words) in one request (WP:RMCM). SilverLocust 💬 00:57, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that we should discuss it thoroughly; but I very much support the proposal to make article titles match the actual word, rather than using approximations that probably changes a lot of meaning in linguistics. Whenever, I read linguistics articles, I find that every tiny glyph carries some meaning and significance, so we should not avoid them in titles. CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {CX}) 19:58, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@CX Zoom: The meaning of the asterisk, by the way, is that it is a reconstructed word. (In other linguistics contexts it is used to indicate an incorrect usage.) SilverLocust 💬 23:49, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Jcitawy, I think the conclusion here is this needs a formal discussion. Please start an RM. I think you'll find several people, including me, who would support your proposal in a formal discussion, but this definitely cannot be processed here as an undiscussed, uncontroversial move, for the reasons explained by @SilverLocust. If you don't know how to start an RM and you need help, please let me know and I'll be happy to help. Dr. Vogel (talk) 00:40, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Loafiewa: Hm. Do you substantively prefer PP-19 Vityaz? This was an RM, albeit with no other participants. The same user (using Guns & Glory) was also the one who moved it to PP-19 Vityaz in 2020. I don't see anyone in previous discussions who expressed a preference for "PP-19 Vityaz" over "PP-19-01 Vityaz". The previous consensus, as determined by a different user's banned sockpuppet in 2018, was "not moved" from Vityaz-SN. SilverLocust 💬 02:43, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not contesting this, however. SilverLocust 💬 03:29, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't feel particularly strongly about any of the 3 names, but BANREVERT states that "the presumption in ambiguous cases is to revert". Loafiewa (talk) 05:47, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
While it is true that there is no solid consensus among the 3 names, the sock followed standard procedure to request the move. The last move request which I closed was originally a contested technical request which was converted into a formal RM. The same will hold true for this technical request. ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 09:08, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I agree – there was plenty of opportunity for someone to oppose the move, and nobody did. If someone has an objection outside of BANREVERT, I'd be more encouraged to overturn. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 00:21, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Needs to go through RM to determine consensus. ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 09:00, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This proposed move is also controversial and likewise needs to be decided by consensus. —Roman Spinner (talkcontribs) 08:45, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: 2603:7000:2101:AA00:B90B:DAA9:2A4:E56C please consider registering an account. You're participating in several threads here and that'd make it easier to communicate. Dr. Vogel (talk) 01:14, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@DarkKyoushu: WP:NCVG says the title should be "the most common word or phrase used to describe" it (WP:COMMONNAME), which may not be the full official title (WP:OFFICIALNAME). If the common name is a short version, but that short version is still ambiguous, then the full name could be used to disambiguate the page from other articles (WP:NATURAL). SilverLocust 💬 07:41, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed, either way; It should be lowercase "Ar tonelico" - and with a roman numeral for the second title, as WP:NCVG 4. "For series that use either Arabic numerals or Roman numerals to denote the order of games in the series, use the numerals in the official titles for the games, even if their types vary from game to game (for example, Final Fantasy IV instead of Final Fantasy 4, and Quake 4 instead of Quake IV)." I would argue that it'd be WP:COMMONNAME - and by extension WP:NCVG's "Use the most commonly accepted English name first" as all sources on the article use "Ar tonelico II: Melody of Metafalica"; The sources on the Qoaga article use "Ar tonelico Qoga: Knell of Ar Ciel" or "Ar tonelico III" - although now that I'm siffing through these articles and sources; It lacks references and I think these are ready for a clean-up and overhaul.  ►Kyo  ►Talk  15:13, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Administrator needed