Jump to content

User talk:Anatole55: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
{{checkuserblock-account}}.
Line 45: Line 45:
== August 2023 ==
== August 2023 ==
{{checkuserblock-account|sig=--[[User:Blablubbs|Blablubbs]] ([[User talk:Blablubbs|talk]]) 21:53, 16 August 2023 (UTC)}}
{{checkuserblock-account|sig=--[[User:Blablubbs|Blablubbs]] ([[User talk:Blablubbs|talk]]) 21:53, 16 August 2023 (UTC)}}

:{{unblock|Hello,
:Thanks for your contribution on my account but as edits which seemed irrelevant(abusive edit) have already been reverted.
:As I am still learning the work procedures followed on Wikipedia, I didn't intend to breach any policy with my content. I have always intended to use reliable Wikipedia and Tier A media sources in my edits across multiple pages. By doing this, I intend to contribute in making Wikipedia more informative for the readers with facts, by strictly adhering to Wikipedia policies & guidelines. I have worked really hard on my account and have learnt a lot through Wikipedia. I would request you to please unblock my account and guide me on how I can be a great contributor to the Wikipedia as I definitely intend to work as per Wikipedia policies. Kindly advise, thanks!}} [[User:Anatole55|Anatole55]] ([[User talk:Anatole55#top|talk]]) 05:36, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:36, 17 August 2023

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Aerodreams.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Aerodreams.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:30, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Danish Aviation Systems.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Danish Aviation Systems.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:30, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit reversion

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick(Talk) 14:01, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Enviornment Conservation (Qatar), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:41, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Environment Conservation (Qatar), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Devonian Wombat (talk) 02:03, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This page - Environment Conservation (Qatar) was created to add more refine and environment dedicated information along with definition to the encyclopedia.
As per Wikipedia policies, the content fulfilled all the policies and parameters. My added data/created page contained no such Articles, images, categories etc. That can be considered offensive to the platform. If so, kindly guide me to improve the page content with regard to platform's latest guidelines once the page is retrieved. Anatole55 (talk) 06:31, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
--Blablubbs (talk) 21:53, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Anatole55 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello,
Thanks for your contribution on my account but as edits which seemed irrelevant(abusive edit) have already been reverted.
As I am still learning the work procedures followed on Wikipedia, I didn't intend to breach any policy with my content. I have always intended to use reliable Wikipedia and Tier A media sources in my edits across multiple pages. By doing this, I intend to contribute in making Wikipedia more informative for the readers with facts, by strictly adhering to Wikipedia policies & guidelines. I have worked really hard on my account and have learnt a lot through Wikipedia. I would request you to please unblock my account and guide me on how I can be a great contributor to the Wikipedia as I definitely intend to work as per Wikipedia policies. Kindly advise, thanks!

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Hello, :Thanks for your contribution on my account but as edits which seemed irrelevant(abusive edit) have already been reverted. :As I am still learning the work procedures followed on Wikipedia, I didn't intend to breach any policy with my content. I have always intended to use reliable Wikipedia and Tier A media sources in my edits across multiple pages. By doing this, I intend to contribute in making Wikipedia more informative for the readers with facts, by strictly adhering to Wikipedia policies & guidelines. I have worked really hard on my account and have learnt a lot through Wikipedia. I would request you to please unblock my account and guide me on how I can be a great contributor to the Wikipedia as I definitely intend to work as per Wikipedia policies. Kindly advise, thanks! |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Hello, :Thanks for your contribution on my account but as edits which seemed irrelevant(abusive edit) have already been reverted. :As I am still learning the work procedures followed on Wikipedia, I didn't intend to breach any policy with my content. I have always intended to use reliable Wikipedia and Tier A media sources in my edits across multiple pages. By doing this, I intend to contribute in making Wikipedia more informative for the readers with facts, by strictly adhering to Wikipedia policies & guidelines. I have worked really hard on my account and have learnt a lot through Wikipedia. I would request you to please unblock my account and guide me on how I can be a great contributor to the Wikipedia as I definitely intend to work as per Wikipedia policies. Kindly advise, thanks! |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Hello, :Thanks for your contribution on my account but as edits which seemed irrelevant(abusive edit) have already been reverted. :As I am still learning the work procedures followed on Wikipedia, I didn't intend to breach any policy with my content. I have always intended to use reliable Wikipedia and Tier A media sources in my edits across multiple pages. By doing this, I intend to contribute in making Wikipedia more informative for the readers with facts, by strictly adhering to Wikipedia policies & guidelines. I have worked really hard on my account and have learnt a lot through Wikipedia. I would request you to please unblock my account and guide me on how I can be a great contributor to the Wikipedia as I definitely intend to work as per Wikipedia policies. Kindly advise, thanks! |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Anatole55 (talk) 05:36, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]