Talk:Seneca the Younger: Difference between revisions
ClueBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 1 discussion to Talk:Seneca the Younger/Archive 1. (BOT) |
→References - ISBN hyperlink not working: new section |
||
Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
I found this article a mix of AE and BE spellings. In [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Seneca_the_Younger&oldid=268769836 this early version] there is only AE ("romanticized" etc.), so I've standardized on AE (without, of course, changing any verbatim quotations). [[User:JamesMLane|JamesMLane]]<small> [[User_talk:JamesMLane|t]] [[Special:Contributions/JamesMLane|c]]</small> 13:33, 2 August 2022 (UTC) |
I found this article a mix of AE and BE spellings. In [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Seneca_the_Younger&oldid=268769836 this early version] there is only AE ("romanticized" etc.), so I've standardized on AE (without, of course, changing any verbatim quotations). [[User:JamesMLane|JamesMLane]]<small> [[User_talk:JamesMLane|t]] [[Special:Contributions/JamesMLane|c]]</small> 13:33, 2 August 2022 (UTC) |
||
== References - ISBN hyperlink not working == |
|||
The first of the references listed under the reference tab does not produce the reference via the hyperlink of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/978-0226748429 for what reason, I cannot say, I am merely a passerby and do not know the intricacies of the wikipedia booksources system. [[Special:Contributions/174.247.12.13|174.247.12.13]] ([[User talk:174.247.12.13|talk]]) 21:13, 18 August 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:13, 18 August 2023
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Seneca the Younger article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Removed quotations
I've removed the very random (and pointless) list of Seneca quotations. Twice now this year someone has added the following quotation to the list:
Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful.
As pointed out on Wikiquote, this is not a Seneca quotation. The fact that someone can add such a quote to the page, and it goes unchallenged, shows why lists of quotes are best left to Wikiquote. Pasicles (talk) 18:15, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
- This is a very widely published (mis?)quotation - so suggest appropriate as "disputed" in the useful section "Pseudo-Seneca". Roy Bateman (talk) 05:56, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted material
A lot of biographical and other material was deleted by this edit. Are any contributors to this article able to rescue it? -- Ssilvers (talk) 16:36, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Seneca Immortality quote
Can the archivist/ author please supply the citation for the boxed Seneca quote:
"What would it take to make men believe in immortality ?, once asked Seneca. To which he replied, that a man had risen from the dead. – Seneca the Younger"
It is possible this is an obscure quote from an early church "Father" such as Tertullian referring to Seneca, however I believe after much searching that it is an extremely paraphrased version of a portion of Seneca's Epistle to Lucillius XXX.9, which is reproduced in https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Moral_letters_to_Lucilius/Letter_30:
"Accordingly, I listened to Bassus with the deepest pleasure; he was casting his vote concerning death and pointing out what sort of a thing it is when it is observed, so to speak, nearer at hand. I suppose that a man would have your confidence in a larger degree, and would have more weight with you, if he had come back to life and should declare from experience that there is no evil in death; and so, regarding the approach of death, those will tell you best what disquiet it brings who have stood in its path, who have seen it coming and have welcomed it."
This Seneca quote has been similarly poorly paraphrased in the past by Christian scholars, e.g. "The Connection Between the Sacred Writings and the Literature of Jewish and Heathen Authors: Particularly that of the Classical Ages, Illustrated, Principally with a View to Evidence in Confirmation of the Truth of Revealed Religion, Volume 2, F. C. and J. Rivington, 1819", where it is phrased thus:
"It is remarkable that Seneca observes: 'If one were to rise from the dead, and to inform us upon his own experience, that there is no evil in death, he would obtain more credit, and have greater weight with us than an ordinary teacher!'"
The fact that the Wiki Seneca quote has its own prominent box and is a striking statement (to anyone interested in the origins of Christianity), and yet appears to be a gross overstretch of what Seneca actually said, to me is unacceptable -- unless it is a quote from another author referring to what they think is the gist of Seneca's XXX.9 quote, in which case the correct author of the statement should replace "- Seneca the Younger".
If the quote turns out to be paraphrased Seneca, it should be completely removed from the prominent box, but could be included in the body text in a modified form to indicate it is somebody's (cite please) interpretation of the XXX.9 quote.
AdamKW (talk) 22:19, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
- To editor AdamKW: I was starting to look into the same quote, when I discovered you'd done this excellent work already. I removed the box in question:
“ What would it take to make men believe in immortality? once asked Seneca. To which he replied, that a man had risen from the dead. ” – Seneca the Younger
- As for who put it there, there is a tool called WikiBlame (a name which is to me both funny and off-putting; what if you're trying to WikiApplaud?) that can tell you. You can then try asking the original editor on the editor's talk page. Sometimes hints can be found in the context of the original edit, too.
- Any page that has a history has a link to WikiBlame: select
View History
→Revision history search
.
- Thanks for your earnest work! Earnestness is my favorite virtue, by the way, so I only use it in compliments when I really mean it. — Geekdiva (talk) 02:50, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
Spelling
I found this article a mix of AE and BE spellings. In this early version there is only AE ("romanticized" etc.), so I've standardized on AE (without, of course, changing any verbatim quotations). JamesMLane t c 13:33, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
References - ISBN hyperlink not working
The first of the references listed under the reference tab does not produce the reference via the hyperlink of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/978-0226748429 for what reason, I cannot say, I am merely a passerby and do not know the intricacies of the wikipedia booksources system. 174.247.12.13 (talk) 21:13, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- High-importance biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Arts and entertainment work group articles
- C-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class Philosophy articles
- Mid-importance Philosophy articles
- C-Class philosopher articles
- Mid-importance philosopher articles
- Philosophers task force articles
- C-Class Ancient philosophy articles
- Mid-importance Ancient philosophy articles
- Ancient philosophy task force articles
- C-Class Classical Greece and Rome articles
- High-importance Classical Greece and Rome articles
- All WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome pages
- C-Class Latin articles
- Mid-importance Latin articles
- C-Class Spain articles
- Low-importance Spain articles
- All WikiProject Spain pages