User talk:Merlierj: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 15:39, 21 August 2023

August 2023

Hello, I'm MrOllie. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. MrOllie (talk) 14:18, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The constructive aspect is the lessening of the dismissing aspect of the term 'conspiracy theory' when replaced with 'conspiracy hypothesis'. A conspiracy theory is often a term we accuse someone off to dismiss their point of view, a conspiracy hypothesis is a term first coined by Bret Weinstein have just that use, reverse the negative connotation attributed to conspiracy theory and therefore to also reverse the usage, let's think about what someone is saying, assuming he is supporting a hypothesis, instead of dismissing it and trying to attack his reputation ! Merlierj (talk) 15:39, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 14:18, 21 August 2023 edit MrOllie (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 232,544 edits General note: Unconstructive editing. Tag: Twinkle		Latest revision as of 15:39, 21 August 2023 edit undo Merlierj (talk \| contribs) 22 edits →August 2023: Reply Tag: Reply
Line 2:		Line 2:

	[[File:Information.svg\|25px\|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I'm [[User:MrOllie\|MrOllie]]. I wanted to let you know that one or more of [[Special:Contributions/Merlierj\|your recent contributions]] have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use [[User:Merlierj/sandbox\|your sandbox]]. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the [[Wikipedia:Teahouse\|Teahouse]] or the [[Wikipedia:Help desk\|Help desk]]. Thanks.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --> [[User:MrOllie\|MrOllie]] ([[User talk:MrOllie\|talk]]) 14:18, 21 August 2023 (UTC)		[[File:Information.svg\|25px\|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I'm [[User:MrOllie\|MrOllie]]. I wanted to let you know that one or more of [[Special:Contributions/Merlierj\|your recent contributions]] have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use [[User:Merlierj/sandbox\|your sandbox]]. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the [[Wikipedia:Teahouse\|Teahouse]] or the [[Wikipedia:Help desk\|Help desk]]. Thanks.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --> [[User:MrOllie\|MrOllie]] ([[User talk:MrOllie\|talk]]) 14:18, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

			:The constructive aspect is the lessening of the dismissing aspect of the term 'conspiracy theory' when replaced with 'conspiracy hypothesis'. A conspiracy theory is often a term we accuse someone off to dismiss their point of view, a conspiracy hypothesis is a term first coined by Bret Weinstein have just that use, reverse the negative connotation attributed to conspiracy theory and therefore to also reverse the usage, let's think about what someone is saying, assuming he is supporting a hypothesis, instead of dismissing it and trying to attack his reputation ! [[User:Merlierj\|Merlierj]] ([[User talk:Merlierj#top\|talk]]) 15:39, 21 August 2023 (UTC)