Wikipedia talk:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Index

Another log problem

Hello, in this entry it has added Fountains Fell as been changed from C-class to Unassessed-Class. The talk page of that article has not changed since 6 April 2017. No idea why it has made that entry as still C-class. Keith D (talk) 11:42, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

In this entry it has added Happy Valley (TV series) as been changed from C-class to Unassessed-Class. The talk page of that article has not changed since 1 February 2023. It appears to be picking random entries to reassses as that entry is still C-class. Keith D (talk) 12:04, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Sorry for the extremely delayed response to this. I looked at the revision quoted in the log [1] and it looks like the project was added to the Yorkshire project at that revision. So actually it makes sense in the log right, that it went from Unassessed to C, specifically for the Yorkshire project? audiodude (talk) 20:02, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Okay sorry, I see that it went from C to Unassessed, my mistake. I guess the best explanation I can come up with off the top of my head is that the bot is somehow misreading the current rating and it is defaulting to Unassessed, but I'm not sure when or why this is happening. audiodude (talk) 20:06, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Removing "importance" from a table

When a WikiProject stops tracking "importance" (i.e., {{WikiProject Anarchism}}) what needs to change on the 1.0 bot side so that the table stops generating importance columns in the table? Is it automatic once |importance= is depopulated from all banners? czar 05:31, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

My initial guess would be that you have to delete the "*-Importance anarchism articles" categories, but it looks like you've already done that. I'm not sure the bot has the ability to disregard importance information when it doesn't find those categories, if the importance information existed previously. audiodude (talk) 02:40, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

Weird table created

There was a WikiProject "Public art" (lowercase a), which became "Public Art" in 2012, and now back to "Public art". At its lowercase "a" page User:WP 1.0 bot/Tables/Project/Public art, a weird table is created; whereas in its uppercase "A" page User:WP 1.0 bot/Tables/Project/Public Art (last revision before clearing up), a perfect table is created. Since all future stats will be recorded at lowercase "a" title, can we get the perfect table carried over there? Thanks! —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 07:04, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Minor Feature Request

On the Log pages, could we wrap {{Log}} in <noinclude> tags? I.e. {{Log}} would change to <noinclude>{{Log}}</noinclude>. Since this page if often transcluded onto WikiProject pages, this would get ready of the unnecessary template and provide more space to view the article links. See Wikipedia:WikiProject Green Bay Packers#Assessment for an example. Getting rid of the template in the transcluded view would provide more space to see articles (and the template itself isn't helpful in a transcluded view, since you would still need to navigate to the page to actually try to edit it. Thank you! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:33, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Pinging audiodude. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 18:02, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the suggestion, that makes sense. Added an issue here. audiodude (talk) 19:16, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

Okay I've fixed that bug and deployed the server. It should be fixed in tomorrow's updates. audiodude (talk) 04:10, 21 September 2023 (UTC)